Obtaining First Class Relic (Reboot)

  • Thread starter Thread starter CatholicFireman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CatholicFireman

Guest
Upon the advice of a wise person ( šŸ˜‰ ) I thought I’d start this thread from the original one ( forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=75838 ) just in case anybody wishes to revisit the subject. My last post was:
I have a first class relic of St. Augustine I inherited from my dad (a former seminarian).
He’s not around to ask but I did have it confirmed by and Augustinian priest. Dad had a few relics from priests and religious but I never was interested at the time so I never asked. I regret that now.
 
Do you know what a first class relic is? You believe that you have the bones of St. Augustine of Hippo?
 
Do you know what a first class relic is? You believe that you have the bones of St. Augustine of Hippo?
I am fully aware of what a first class relic is and I am only going by what an Augustinian priest told me. If it’s not then it’s not. I’m not saying, ā€œLook at me I have a first class relic!ā€ You may look at the photos I provided and decide for yourself.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=911855&highlight=Help+with+a+relic

I may ask again, but I don’t think there’s a need to. I honor it as I would any class relic (or saint).
 
Wow! I read the entire first thread and looked at all the links.

Your father having had possession of a relic makes sense, the seal matches the one in the link it would appear. Even without the papers, you have a magnificent relic in my opinion. How blessed you are to have not only something from your dad that obviously meant a lot to him, but something so precious and rare.
 
What does your authentication consist of. If you have no paperwork then its speculation no matter what a priest may have told you.
Did you look at the photos and at the information in the links?

CatholicFireman, I don’t understand the need of people to be so negative. ā€œSpeculationā€ is in the mind of the beholder. I would take the opinions of the 2 people (one being a priest) you consulted that have actual knowledge over the words of people that just need to be negative for the sake of bring negative. 🤷

And if you had paperwork, next people would be telling you that you shouldn’t keep it for yourself. So be happy for what you have, and be glad it’s ā€œnothing.ā€ :rolleyes:
 
Did you look at the photos and at the information in the links?

CatholicFireman, I don’t understand the need of people to be so negative. ā€œSpeculationā€ is in the mind of the beholder. I would take the opinions of the 2 people (one being a priest) you consulted that have actual knowledge over the words of people that just need to be negative for the sake of bring negative. 🤷

And if you had paperwork, next people would be telling you that you shouldn’t keep it for yourself. So be happy for what you have, and be glad it’s ā€œnothing.ā€ :rolleyes:
Your comments are irrelevant. Authentication requires official documents. Without that a claim to have a genuine relic is meaningless.
 
Yeah, what she said. :rolleyes:

I really think you’re only reason for posting here is vanity (you know, ā€œholier than thouā€). During this Lenten season, maybe we should examine our motives when we post on CAF forum and we if we are being truly charitable (i.e. to clergy, particularly the one I mentioned who I have the utmost respect for. I believe his ā€œopinionsā€ more than a faceless poster).

But for now, as OP, I will deal with this as I see fit.

Good and God Bless. šŸ™‚
 
Yeah, what she said. :rolleyes:

I really think you’re only reason for posting here is vanity (you know, ā€œholier than thouā€). During this Lenten season, maybe we should examine our motives when we post on CAF forum and we if we are being truly charitable (i.e. to clergy, particularly the one I mentioned who I have the utmost respect for. I believe his ā€œopinionsā€ more than a faceless poster).

But for now, as OP, I will deal with this as I see fit.

Good and God Bless. šŸ™‚
If you don’t want actual opinions from people why start a thread. After all, this is a discussion forum.
Only official documentation proves what you have is authentic.
 
Your comments are irrelevant.
If you don’t want actual opinions from people why start a thread. After all, this is a discussion forum.
Only official documentation proves what you have is authentic.
It is apparent that only your opinion matters, which you have given at least three times now. There has been no discussion allowed. Everyone is dismissed by you.
 
Upon the advice of a wise person ( šŸ˜‰ ) I thought I’d start this thread from the original one ( forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=75838 ) just in case anybody wishes to revisit the subject. My last post was:
That’s really awesome. šŸ™‚

Thanks for sharing the picture of it with us, so that we could see it, too.

I have a third class relic of St. Padre Pio.

Someone also sent one to my husband last year at Christmas anonymously in a Christmas card, but we think that we know who it was.

We believe that it was a Catholic coworker of his who mailed it to him here to him at our home address. That was thoughtful of her to do that. šŸ™‚
 
It is apparent that only your opinion matters, which you have given at least three times now. There has been no discussion allowed. Everyone is dismissed by you.
There, there. I’m enabling my right to use the ignore function. šŸ™‚

I’m not here to argue, but to share cool stories about relics, not puff my chest out and pat myself on the back. :rolleyes:
 
That’s really awesome. šŸ™‚

Thanks for sharing the picture of it with us, so that we could see it, too.

I have a third class relic of St. Padre Pio.

Someone also sent one to my husband last year at Christmas anonymously in a Christmas card, but we think that we know who it was.

We believe that it was a Catholic coworker of his who mailed it to him here to him at our home address. That was thoughtful of her to do that. šŸ™‚
That’s awesome! I got one too. šŸ™‚

My dad was a seminarian and I think he got the St. Augustine relic from a priest.
 
Your comments are irrelevant. Authentication requires official documents. Without that a claim to have a genuine relic is meaningless.
No. This is not correct.

It happens not infrequently that relics get separated from the authentication, above all when it concerned relics possessed by those in Religious life.

The lack of the document does not render the claim meaningless at all, especially where the provenance is beyond dispute. On the other hand, the authentication matters principally if the relic is destined for the public veneration of the faithful.

Moreover, the Vicariato stopped issuing authenticates for relics from the first centuries that could no longer reasonably be historically attested to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top