Official: Some Clinton emails 'too damaging' to release

  • Thread starter Thread starter slMike
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
some people must not care if she’s trustworthy or not.
90 percent did and thats a fact. This thread is not about the republicans which you continue to inject, please attempt to stay on topic. Her lacking trust relates directly to her email dilemma. And the fact that “some people” don’t care is more indicative of their non caring attitude than any quality of Hillary.
 
Well, as you say Lilly; " some people must not care if she’s trustworthy or not." I can’t do any better that you did admittedly. 😃
 
Well, as you say Lilly; " some people must not care if she’s trustworthy or not." I can’t do any better that you did admittedly. 😃
I don’t like her; I don’t want her to be president, but I’m a realist, even when things aren’t as I like them. For some reason I can’t figure out some people put on blinders where the Clintons are concerned. 🤷
 
Most people removed any blinders when the bright lights got turned off - then they could clearly see what Obama/Clinton were: wolves in sheep’s clothing!
 
Most people removed any blinders when the bright lights got turned off - then they could clearly see what Obama/Clinton were: wolves in sheep’s clothing!
Apparently they didn’t or Clinton wouldn’t be getting the votes and the support she’s getting making her, as of now, the Democratic front runner. She didn’t achieve that position because people don’t like or trust her. And she’s got it despite the fact that the majority of people find Sanders the most honest and trustworthy candidate even if they aren’t going to vote for him.
 
Apparently they didn’t or Clinton wouldn’t be getting the votes and the support she’s getting making her, as of now, the Democratic front runner. She didn’t achieve that position because people don’t like or trust her. And she’s got it despite the fact that the majority of people find Sanders the most honest and trustworthy candidate even if they aren’t going to vote for him.
I think some of this ‘support’ is questionable, Have to remember the media is going to twist things around in favor of the person THEY prefer, Im not so sure about the accuracy of many of the media polls.

The few liberal, feminist type women I know, cannot stand her. Many women like this did not like how she stuck by her cheating husband to the degree she did.
 
I think some of this ‘support’ is questionable, Have to remember the media is going to twist things around in favor of the person THEY prefer, Im not so sure about the accuracy of many of the media polls.

The few liberal, feminist type women I know, cannot stand her. Many women like this did not like how she stuck by her cheating husband to the degree she did.
She won by a razor-thin margin in Iowa, and she didn’t win New Hampshire, which was expected since Sanders is loved so much there. Still, she garners votes and huge crowds of supporters, and she will almost surely win South Carolina and Nevada, which aren’t “Sanders friendly.”

The news stories and news shows are filled with media spin, no doubt, but there’s no denying that Clinton draws huge crowds and many, many people support her. Can’t say the crowds and the votes are media spin.

I would rather Sanders win the Democratic nomination, but as each day goes by, it looks more and more like Clinton will arrive at the convention with more than enough votes to give her the nomination. I hope I’m wrong.

Whatever, people are turning out in record numbers, and if that trend continues, it almost guarantees a Democratic win no matter who is the candidate.
 
She won by a razor-thin margin in Iowa, and she didn’t win New Hampshire, which was expected since Sanders is loved so much there. Still, she garners votes and huge crowds of supporters, and she will almost surely win South Carolina and Nevada, which aren’t “Sanders friendly.”

The news stories and news shows are filled with media spin, no doubt, but there’s no denying that Clinton draws huge crowds and many, many people support her. Can’t say the crowds and the votes are media spin.

I would rather Sanders win the Democratic nomination, but as each day goes by, it looks more and more like Clinton will arrive at the convention with more than enough votes to give her the nomination. I hope I’m wrong.

Whatever, people are turning out in record numbers, and if that trend continues, it almost guarantees a Democratic win no matter who is the candidate.
Perhaps you have not seen the clips from some of her gatherings. Many of them have practically no people at all attending. I know she has support of some of the women’s groups but I also know that there are women who do not support her. IMO those who do support her are thinking with their hearts and not their heads–a woman for president no matter how flawed she might be.
 
Perhaps you have not seen the clips from some of her gatherings. Many of them have practically no people at all attending. I know she has support of some of the women’s groups but I also know that there are women who do not support her. IMO those who do support her are thinking with their hearts and not their heads–a woman for president no matter how flawed she might be.
Like all the other candidates with the exception of Trump, Clinton draws small crowds, medium sized crowds, and huge crowds. Some men support her, some don’t. Some women support her, some, like me, don’t. Etc, etc., etc. I’m sure not all the women who support her are women who don’t think things through. If woman just wanted a female president Carly Fiorina wouldn’t be at the bottom of the heap, and she is. I know women, and men, who support Clinton because she is experienced. She’s far too attached to corporate money for me, and I don’t want four to eight more years of “more of the same,” i.e. Obama’s ideology.
 
Like all the other candidates with the exception of Trump, Clinton draws small crowds, medium sized crowds, and huge crowds. Some men support her, some don’t. Some women support her, some, like me, don’t. Etc, etc., etc. I’m sure not all the women who support her are women who don’t think things through. If woman just wanted a female president Carly Fiorina wouldn’t be at the bottom of the heap, and she is. I know women, and men, who support Clinton because she is experienced. She’s far too attached to corporate money for me, and I don’t want four to eight more years of “more of the same,” i.e. Obama’s ideology.
I agree with not wanting four or eight more years of what we have had the last 7. I am not sure what Hillary is experienced in. She has traveled many miles as SoS and accomplished nothing as far as I can see. She has always been around during the Clinton administration and the program turned over to her failed miserably. IMO she talks a good game, lectures actually, but pits one group against another and switches positions bepending to whom she is speaking. I don’t trust her one wit.
 
I agree with not wanting four or eight more years of what we have had the last 7. I am not sure what Hillary is experienced in. She has traveled many miles as SoS and accomplished nothing as far as I can see. She has always been around during the Clinton administration and the program turned over to her failed miserably. IMO she talks a good game, lectures actually, but pits one group against another and switches positions bepending to whom she is speaking. I don’t trust her one wit.
Neither do I trust her.Beginning to look as though many ,many more are feeling the same distrust towards Hillary.
She absolutely feels entitled to be the first female president for a myriad of reasons.Being qualified by way of experience and accomplishment are not a factor in her eyes.She has clawed her way to get this far,by golly she won’t give up without a fight.
 
Neither do I trust her.Beginning to look as though many ,many more are feeling the same distrust towards Hillary.
She absolutely feels entitled to be the first female president for a myriad of reasons.Being qualified by way of experience and accomplishment are not a factor in her eyes.She has clawed her way to get this far,by golly she won’t give up without a fight.
What makes you think that? Her loss in NH? She said she never even wrote a speech in case she won because she was so sure she’d lose that state. There was no question that Bernie would win it. I wish he could keep his momentum going, but Clinton has so many supporters, I doubt that he can. I don’t see that she’s lost any support.

The only news articles I can find about her losing support are old, pre-Iowa ones. And she did lose a lot of support to Sanders, but I don’t see her losing more. I wish Sanders would win, but I see Clinton winning. Hope I’m wrong.
 
Neither do I trust her.Beginning to look as though many ,many more are feeling the same distrust towards Hillary.
She absolutely feels entitled to be the first female president for a myriad of reasons.Being qualified by way of experience and accomplishment are not a factor in her eyes.She has clawed her way to get this far,by golly she won’t give up without a fight.
townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/02/09/hillary-pales-in-trustworthy-numbers-to-sanders-n2117206

“Ouch: Only 5 Percent in NH Poll Say Hillary is Trustworthy, Sanders 93 Percent”

So I guess those of us on this thread who have been saying she is dishonest are in the 95% group.
 
townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/02/09/hillary-pales-in-trustworthy-numbers-to-sanders-n2117206

“Ouch: Only 5 Percent in NH Poll Say Hillary is Trustworthy, Sanders 93 Percent”

So I guess those of us on this thread who have been saying she is dishonest are in the 95% group.
Every single politician is dishonest to some degree. Yes, that includes Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders, Trump, Rubio and any other politician you would care to name. It is simply impossible to succeed in American politics without some lies and some hypocrisy.
 
Every single politician is dishonest to some degree. Yes, that includes Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders, Trump, Rubio and any other politician you would care to name. It is simply impossible to succeed in American politics without some lies and some hypocrisy.
I agree with that. All people are dishonest to some degree, but it seems to be more prevalent in politics than anything else.

Personally, I trust Sanders most, Cruz and Fiorina least, but Fiorina has dropped out, so Cruz and Trump. Clinton, I would put in the middle of my list, along with Rubio and Kasich.
 
Every single politician is dishonest to some degree. Yes, that includes Ted Cruz, Bernie Sanders, Trump, Rubio and any other politician you would care to name. It is simply impossible to succeed in American politics without some lies and some hypocrisy.
But there are degrees of honesty among all. All politicians lie in some manner, in fact all people lie, just some more than others. My point is 95% of those polled in NH found Hillary untrustworthy. That’s not just “some”. She has been dishonest and untrustworthy since the Nixon administration, (1969-1974), so why would anyone trust her with the highest, most powerful office in this country? It’s like creating a fake profile to join a web site. There is a difference between not putting all your info out there and just putting out false info. The first may be hiding something or wants to keep some anonymity and the second is just dishonest. The reality is the dishonest will always fall. Hillary, I think, is learning you can’t keep a house of cards (lies) standing for long. She may have gotten away with things for a long time, but it is all catching up to her now.
 
But there are degrees of honesty among all. All politicians lie in some manner, in fact all people lie, just some more than others. My point is 95% of those polled in NH found Hillary untrustworthy. That’s not just “some”. She has been dishonest and untrustworthy since the Nixon administration, (1969-1974), so why would anyone trust her with the highest, most powerful office in this country? It’s like creating a fake profile to join a web site. There is a difference between not putting all your info out there and just putting out false info. The first may be hiding something or wants to keep some anonymity and the second is just dishonest. The reality is the dishonest will always fall. Hillary, I think, is learning you can’t keep a house of cards (lies) standing for long. She may have gotten away with things for a long time, but it is all catching up to her now.
Doubt many of those who will vote for Hillary know any of that. They like Hillary, why I don’t know, but they do and no matter what she has done they will vote for her. Defies logic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top