Ok for Catholics to go and stay at Orthodoxy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul_theApostle
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am glad to see a Roman Catholic post these things.

Not that I believe them, I don’t, but too many are wishy washy about it.
Glad to make you glad 🙂 On something like this where the Catholic Church spells out so clearly in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a book so easily accessible to every Catholic, and non-Catholic, provided at a low cost in so many languages and even free on the internet website of the Vatican, gives me the boldness to speak or rather write firmly on the issue.
 
Glad to make you glad 🙂 On something like this where the Catholic Church spells out so clearly in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, a book so easily accessible to every Catholic, and non-Catholic, provided at a low cost in so many languages and even free on the internet website of the Vatican, gives me the boldness to speak or rather write firmly on the issue.
Does the CCC spell out what the role of the Catholic Church was in the Schism?
 
Does the CCC spell out what the role of the Catholic Church was in the Schism?
The CCC spells out the doctrines and dogmas of the Church.
  1. Wounds to Unity CCC 817-819
  2. Filioque CCC 245-248
  3. Keys of the Kingdom CCC 551-553
  4. Supremacy of the Pope CCC 882-885
If you don’t already own a CCC, I recommend what I consider the Little One, about the size of a long paperback novel. It’s published by Image/Doubleday. Costs about $7.00. It has Subject Index in the back. You’ll totally love it 👍
 
The CCC spells out the doctrines and dogmas of the Church.
  1. Wounds to Unity CCC 817-819
  2. Filioque CCC 245-248
  3. Keys of the Kingdom CCC 551-553
  4. Supremacy of the Pope CCC 882-885
If you don’t already own a CCC, I recommend what I consider the Little One, about the size of a long paperback novel. It’s published by Image/Doubleday. Costs about $7.00. It has Subject Index in the back. You’ll totally love it 👍
I have more than one thank you very much.

I have yet to see in it the reasons for the pride involved for the seperation to not be healed at this point. But, Tiaras don’t help much I am sure.
 
Seems to me the bigger pricture is overlooked. 🤷 And Protestants have Jesus Only also. Thats not saying much. In fact its the problem. Everyone has a different agenda, all their own, and none ever align with each other. Fact is this is why evil in the world grows. If both operate on a dysfunctional level, whom will attract the unthinking mass? As we see its not Christianity. 🤷

And Free Masons? Here’s a fact for you, there 3-million in America, out of that 3-million 1.3 million are Southern Baptists. And its not discouraged because the SBC doesn’t want the all important numbers lost.

So what then is the correct thinking? Someone who can focus the efforts in the right direction together. Or 3600 different agendas preaching everything from true Gospel to poison snake handling? To sin is nothing but a self esteem issue???

Come-on lets stop talking falsely here.
 
I think when we get to the point of asking if being in union with the Pope is necessary for salvation, we’ve missed the mark a bit. It’s not as simple as Jesus vs Pope + Jesus.

It’s not that all those who aren’t in communion with the Pope are damned. But the Pope is in fact the Pope, and that fact is given to us by God. Rejecting this because you are not convinced it is true is one thing - you are still rejecting God’s truth, but the severity of such an act may be lessened based on circumstances, how you were raised, what kind of arguments you’ve seen etc etc. But to actually believe that the Pope is the Pope and then to behave otherwise is a direct rejection of God’s truth while knowing it is such, and this is what I referred to earlier, with my tendency for understatement, as “very bad.” (And that is, as ComeHome pointed out, a very large understatement.) It’s not whether not salvation is possible outside of the visible confines of the Catholic Church (answer: yes) but whether or not it is permissible to ignore part of the Truth God gave us while knowing that you are doing so. Answer: NO.
 
Thanks for your posts Iron Donkey

What do you mean by saying if one knows ‘the Pope is the Pope’?

Do you mean like hes the Visible head of the Church and Chief Pastor and all should remain in unity with him?

Why would someone break union with Rome or the Pope on purpose,if they believed that the RC was the real Church of Christ.

I know alot of Catholics that have become Orthodox,most had negative experiences with the Catholics when they were young or at the seminary which caused them to leave,some left firstly for Anglicanism then after found Orthodoxy

Seeing them leave Rome for Anglicanism first,i wonder if they were really taking the right path anyhow.Would a true Catholic really leave their Church for Anglicanism??

I left Rome for many years for Orthodoxy as well,i wasnt a regular practicing Catholic and emotionally got close with and involved with a greek girl and her family and got swept away to Orthodoxy

Now ive become lately a practicing Catholic and im really enjoying it and love the Church and all its devotions and Mass

anyway God Bless
 
Thanks for your posts Iron Donkey

What do you mean by saying if one knows ‘the Pope is the Pope’?

Do you mean like hes the Visible head of the Church and Chief Pastor and all should remain in unity with him?

Why would someone break union with Rome or the Pope on purpose,if they believed that the RC was the real Church of Christ.

I know alot of Catholics that have become Orthodox,most had negative experiences with the Catholics when they were young or at the seminary which caused them to leave,some left firstly for Anglicanism then after found Orthodoxy

Seeing them leave Rome for Anglicanism first,i wonder if they were really taking the right path anyhow.Would a true Catholic really leave their Church for Anglicanism??

I left Rome for many years for Orthodoxy as well,i wasnt a regular practicing Catholic and emotionally got close with and involved with a greek girl and her family and got swept away to Orthodoxy

Now ive become lately a practicing Catholic and im really enjoying it and love the Church and all its devotions and Mass

anyway God Bless
I think I was writing primarily in response to the idea that because the Catholic Church considers Orthodox sacraments valid that this should mean that the Catholic Church considers Orthodoxy correct to the point where it makes no difference whether one is Orthodox or Catholic.

I’m not sure that anyone actually held this view, but it appeared that there was some confusion over what various posters meant (in particular with reference to the word “valid”) that caused one of the posters to be writing that Catholics consider Orthodox sacraments valid as though this were a counter to the idea that Catholics don’t think that the Orthodox contain the fullness of Christianity, and the other way around.

This has grown somewhat since I started typing, and may not be exactly what you were asking, but what I was trying to say is this:

i-We must live by God’s truth as best we understand it.
ii-We must put forth reasonable (by which I mean proportionate to importance, not ‘a medium amount’) of effort to form our understanding.
iii-Acting contradictory to our understanding of the God’s truth is in fact putting our will against God’s will, and hence sinful.
iv-Leaving the Church for any reason other than being convinced that it is false is either 1) making a decision that should be based on truth without considering it or attempting to figure out what the truth is (ie failure of ii and/or i) or 2) doing something we actually believe to be wrong (failure of iii).

Since these are pretty standard, it follows that the only reason that should even seem reasonable to a Catholic to leave the Church is because that Catholic has come, after a reasonable amount (which in this case means a whole lot) of time and effort, to be believe with reasonable certainty and based on actual arguments, logic, and reason (and discussion with knowledgeable Catholics on any problems they see, etc), that the Church is wrong.

Obviously, as a Catholic, I believe that anyone who does so has made an error in their reasoning, but error in reasoning is not necessarily sinful.

On the other hand, we have those people who were hurt by members of the Church. These people do not have, and for the most part don’t really believe they have, a logical reason for believing the teachings of the Church to be false, but will sometimes leave because the hurt that was done to them (understandably) tarnishes their image of the Church and makes it appear to be other than it is. These people are hence deceived by those who hurt them - and that deception will have to be answered for. But not, primarily, by the deceived.

So there are two basic reasons (and perhaps some more variations of them) that I can see a person using semi-legitimately to leave the Church - faulty (from my perspective, which I obviously hold to be true) reasoning, or a perception of the Church as other than what it is, typically brought about by some sort of (often emotional) deception. In each case the person should in fact not leave the Church (because they’re wrong) but it is understandable that they would, and probably not sinful assuming a reasonable (again, reasonable being large) amount of time and thought went into it.

What this does not allow is for people to leave just because they don’t like a particular result of Church teaching, or because they like somewhere else better for some reason. For instance the people who leave the Catholic Church for a protestant church because the protestant sermons are better or the service leaves them with a certain emotional feeling they happen to associate with Holy Stuff without even considering whether or not this sort of thing makes sense, or those that spout off nonsense about the Church discriminating against women without pausing for half a second to to think about what the priesthood actually is or considering that maybe there is more going on than they are aware.

That is the long version of what I was trying to say by “if you believe the Pope is the Pope” (or in general believe the Church to be true) then you can not leave without problems, while trying not to imply implying that all former Catholics are necessarily in deep, ahem, trouble.

Sorry for the length, I’ve often been accused of being unable to introduce myself in less than a thousand words, and I may have been beating on a horse that should have been buried weeks ago, but I wanted to reason through my whole point (partially so I could know what it is).
 
Well thank you for your lengthy reply and thoughts

i cant say more im on someone elses computer i have to go

i disconnected my computer because of temptation and sins of another kind…

God bless u all…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top