K
KCT
Guest
Researching for an OT class. Why are the OT books in the order we find them?
I’ll just point out that there are really different ways to order the biblical books: Jews order the OT differently than Christians do, and the Hebrew, Greek (Septuagint), and the Latin (Vulgate) ordering all differ from each other.Researching for an OT class. Why are the OT books in the order we find them?
As I noted, I’ve already seen some people who see the fact that Daniel is to be found among the ‘Writings’ category to be supportive of a late date for the work, given the gradual nature of the canonization process of the OT (the Ketuvim section being fixed last, after the Torah and the Prophets). I doubt it will have any effect in the Christian ordering of the canon though.I wonder if this will be altered at all by the more recent view of Daniel as a late-date apocalyptic work (165-164 BC), rather than as exilic prophecy?
Pardon me for missing that.As I noted, I’ve already seen some people who see the fact that Daniel is to be found among the ‘Writings’ category to be supportive of a late date for the work, given the gradual nature of the canonization process of the OT (the Ketuvim section being fixed last, after the Torah and the Prophets). I doubt it will have any effect in the Christian ordering of the canon though.
Whether or early or late date, the prophetic aspect of Daniel is also supported by Matthew 11:13 in which Jesus said "the Law and the Prophets prophesied up to John (Baptist). From an apologetics aspect (de-constructing the fabricated “intertestamental period”), the meaning of “up to John” can be argued ad nauseam, but it should be clear that there was indeed revelation in the centuries immediately preceding the Incarnation. Per Jerome’s rendering, “resurrection” as both a concept and a term are in both Daniel and 2 Maccabees. Thus, to me an early date Daniel is more curious as none of the intervening prophets seem to broach the subject. A late date Daniel (165 BC) is conceptually consistent with the resurrection written of in 2 Maccabees.The idea of Daniel as a prophet/the book of Daniel as prophecy is an old one though. The Greek ordering reflects this idea, and, we have both Jesus and Josephus in the 1st century referring to Daniel as a prophet (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14; Antiquities 10).
Interestingly, in his book Inside the Bible, Jesuit Fr. Kenneth Baker places the Book of Wisdom as late as 50 BC (some as late as 29-26 BC), which I find interesting, if only for its thinly veiled prophecy of Christ in chapter 2:12-21. Does any of this musing have to do with the order of books? Potentially.(Daniel, for example, which a number of scholars would date to the 2nd century BC - making it the last OT book to be written!)
Some have even seen Joshua ben-Sira’s (aka Jesus son of Sirach’s) silence about Daniel to be proof of its late date. In Sirach 44-50 ben-Sira praises various figures of Israelite/biblical history; in chapters 48-49 he describes prophets like Isaiah (48:20-25), Jeremiah (49:4-7), Ezekiel (49:8-9), and the twelve minor prophets (49:10) and makes allusions to the books bearing their names (note the Isaiah-Jeremiah-Ezekiel-Minor Prophets order, which corresponds to the order the books appear in the ‘Prophets’ section of the Jewish ordering; the author’s grandson, writing at ca. 130 BC, already knows the OT as “the Law, the Prophets and the other ancestral books”). He then also describes post-exilic people like Zerubbabel, Joshua, and Nehemiah (49:11-13), and Simon the high priest (50:1-21, ca. 280-260 BC). But strangely enough, he does not mention Daniel, nor makes any allusion to the book. Now ben-Sira wrote at around the early 2nd century BC (ca. 180-175 BC), so those who favor a late date for the book would usually put it somewhere after the writing of Sirach.Whether or early or late date, the prophetic aspect of Daniel is also supported by Matthew 11:13 in which Jesus said "the Law and the Prophets prophesied up to John (Baptist). From an apologetics aspect (de-constructing the fabricated “intertestamental period”), the meaning of “up to John” can be argued ad nauseam, but it should be clear that there was indeed revelation in the centuries immediately preceding the Incarnation. Per Jerome’s rendering, “resurrection” as both a concept and a term are in both Daniel and 2 Maccabees. Thus, to me an early date Daniel is more curious as none of the intervening prophets seem to broach the subject. A late date Daniel (165 BC) is conceptually consistent with the resurrection written of in 2 Maccabees.
BTW, the Wisdom of Solomon and 2 Maccabees are AFAIK really the only OT books (at least, what we Catholics would accept as OT) which are originally written in Greek. Greek Esther and Greek Daniel are more like Greek versions of Hebrew/Aramaic works. (A theory explaining the existence of a longer and a shorter version goes like this: the original versions of Esther and Daniel would have probably been the shorter Hebrew/Aramaic versions found today in Jewish and Protestant Bibles; longer versions of these books in Greek, containing additional material, were later composed and circulated. These expanded versions might have even been intended to supplant the earlier, shorter versions of these books, but in any case, while they were adopted by Greek-speaking Diaspora Jews - hence their inclusion in the Septuagint - they failed to catch on among Palestinian and Babylonian Jews, who continued to use the earlier, shorter texts.)Interestingly, in his book Inside the Bible, Jesuit Fr. Kenneth Baker places the Book of Wisdom as late as 50 BC (some as late as 29-26 BC), which I find interesting, if only for its thinly veiled prophecy of Christ in chapter 2:12-21. Does any of this musing have to do with the order of books? Potentially.![]()
A good example of the books of the K’tuvim appearing in a different order would be the Leningrad Codex: (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Codex);I’ll just point out that there are really different ways to order the biblical books: Jews order the OT differently than Christians do, and the Hebrew, Greek (Septuagint), and the Latin (Vulgate) ordering all differ from each other.
The one consistent thing is that the Torah (the Law) - being the most important - comes first. Jews group the OT under three broad categories: the Law (Torah), the Prophets (Nevi’im), and the Writings (Ketuvim) - hence the reason why Jews would often call the OT the Tanakh (an acronym formed from the first letters of Torah, Nevi’im and Ketuvim: TaNaK).
Simply speaking, the Torah and the Prophets section were fixed pretty early. The Torah became the foundation of Jewish law and way of life during and after the Babylonian Exile (some would even put the ‘canonization’ of the Torah much earlier, perhaps around the religious reforms of King Josiah in the late 7th century BC); the ‘Prophets’ (really consisting of Joshua, Judges, Samuel, and Kings - the so-called “Former Prophets” - plus the actual prophets - the “Latter Prophets”) was fixed some time later - maybe somewhere during the period of Persian rule over Judah after the Exile, immediately before the Macedonian conquest (late 4th century BC) or even afterwards, around the 2nd century BC. As chefmomster2 said, the Latter Prophets section is actually organized in order of length: first comes the longer works (Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel) followed by the shorter ones - which are counted as one book or scroll.
The ‘Writings’ was the last section to be canonized (well into the 1st-2nd century AD) and is pretty much the ‘miscellanea’ section. Some scholars even believe that some of the books in the Ketuvim section were among the latest protocanonical books to be written, which to them explains why they are grouped in this section (Daniel, for example, which a number of scholars would date to the 2nd century BC - making it the last OT book to be written!) Unlike in the other two categories, the order of books in the Ketuvim section was never really fixed: different sources and manuscripts had different ways to order the books.
Torah
Genesis (Bereshit “In the Beginning”) - Exodus (Shemot “Names”) - Leviticus (Vayiqra “And He Called”) - Numbers (Bemidbar “In the Desert of…”) - Deuteronomy (Devarim “Words”)
Nevi’im
(Former Prophets) Joshua - Judges (Shofetim) - Samuel (counted as one book) - Kings (Melakhim, counted as one book)
(Latter Prophets) Isaiah - Jeremiah - Ezekiel - Minor Prophets (Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi - counted as one book)
Ketuvim
(Poetic) Psalms (Tehillim “Praises”) - Proverbs (Mishlei) - Job
(The Five Scrolls) Song of Songs (Shir ha-Shirim) - Ruth - Lamentations (Eikhah, “How”) - Ecclesiastes (Qoheleth “[The] Teacher”) - Esther
(Other books) Daniel - Ezra-Nehemiah (counted as one book) - Chronicles (Divrei ha-Yamim “The Matters of the Days,” counted as one book)
All in all, Jews reckon twenty-four books grouped in three sections: five in the Torah, eight in the Prophets, and eleven in the Writings. The canonical order also reflects the status the relevant books have in Judaism: the Law of Moses is on top, followed in descending order by the Prophets and the Writings.
Yes. If you see it as a prophetic work, it comes as the fourth major prophet. If you see it as an apocalyptic work, it would be a writing. Interestingly, the “prophesies” in it give a good figure for the dating: they are quite detailed and very accurate from the time of Daniel in Babylon to the coming of the Greek kingdom–but then they get much less detailed, and are harder to fit to history. Which seems to indicate that it was actually written under the resistance to Antiochus Epiphanes. It often reminds me of that Yogi Berrism: “Prediction is hard, especially about the future.”As I noted, I’ve already seen some people who see the fact that Daniel is to be found among the ‘Writings’ category to be supportive of a late date for the work, given the gradual nature of the canonization process of the OT (the Ketuvim section being fixed last, after the Torah and the Prophets). I doubt it will have any effect in the Christian ordering of the canon though.
The idea of Daniel as a prophet/the book of Daniel as prophecy is an old one though. The Greek ordering reflects this idea, and, we have both Jesus and Josephus in the 1st century referring to Daniel as a prophet (Matthew 24:15; Mark 13:14; Antiquities 10).