The problem with generalities is they are… wait for it … general!
Media likes to make generalities - it takes a whole lot less ink than getting into all of the specifics.
And people, because they are herd-like, buy into these generalities as if they encompassed the sum and substance of reality.
There are still people around who were born in the 30’s, the 40’s, (like me), and the 50’s, Some of these people are the “liberals” (whatever that means) and some are “conservatives” (same issue - definition).
However, the people pre- and just post-WW2 are painted with the brush of the liberal end of the post-V2 movement that went off to the end of the earth, and jumped. In reality, there is a continuous spectrum. It is just that those who were particularly liberal were the darlings of the press, and the ones who “found the microphone” and so were the only ones being noticed. It was not that everyone bought into their images, ideas and practices; some did, many were ambivalent or simply did not pay attention to the liberal end, and some were conservative to arch-conservative. However, one group had the mic and resulted in the rest of us being labeled.
But as has always been true of history (which is why there is such a thing as history), each generation found their own issues, images, ideas and practices.
Along the way, in the Church, we suffered the change in catechesis (Yes, Fr, Hardin had a catechism, and there were a couple of decent ones besides -but the vast majority of parishes seem to have not found them) such that we have two and now almost three generations who have been so poorly catechized that they know little or nothing of the Faith. They can’t tell you what a sacrament is; their knowledge of moral issues is abysmal, and they are far, far more secularized than my generation.
Keep in mind that as far as Mass attendance, it is my generation that has the highest percentage attending Mass each Sunday and the 18 to 25 age range has the lowest (see, e.g., statistics from CARA).
It is easy to say "Well, the current generation (is/does/thinks/feels & etc.), but too often, those saying it are falling into the same trap as those who paint my generation as the “liberals”. Too often we speak both from a narrow perspective and from our own innate prejudices.
To respond to the OP, part of the issue is where you are geographically. In general, the blue states predominate the East Coast (and then there are us dumb clucks out here in Oregon). Rural areas tend more towards red. Inner city parishes tend more towards a liberal view than suburban, and then again farther as you get rural.
Older people, who experienced the Church pre and post Vatican 2 in general have a strong appreciation for the change from Latin to the vernacular; and for the priest facing ad populum rather than liturgical East. Most of them, if asked, could not tell you much in the way of changed rubrics, nor much about the change in prayers.
So, as to comments about changes to the Mass, moral issues, and ordaining women priests, a lot will depend on the parish, and a lot on the geographical area (for example, some inner city parishes may be “hair on fire liberal” and some quietly conservative. Be careful of assuming that whatever sampling you have done is indicative of much more than the sample.