i’m reposting this from another forum since it seems to be more appropriate here
i am a latin catholic and recently i visited a eastern catholic church…there were no easterns there. it was full of protestant converts. what’s up with that? it seems that eastern catholicism (or some of those other societies previously mentioned) is the way to go for very conservative converts. i have to admit i have a liking for both for i see myself as a kind of extreme conservative. but if the mass or the liturgy or whatever you call it is real and valid (as our Church says it is) then you cannot lessen the sublime which is found therein. Brothers we share in One Bread, this is the most sublime of all. lets not forget that.
at any rate, it seems common to see anti-latinism in the eastern catholics i’ve met or even read on this forum. is that something others have notice or is it just me?
I have only attended EC Churches in the Pittsburgh, PA/Weirton, WV and Scranton, PA areas, and here you do not find anti-Latin attitudes. There are many old families and some people like me who came from the Latin Rite. The older people of the old families live that amalgam of spiritualities, in fact there was a time that I have been told of, that in the Ruthenian Rite (and probably others) that many traditions (like a curtain behind the icon and using hot water for communion) were dropped because there were seen as too Orthodox.
Yes, there is a move to reclaim older traditions in the Church to which I now belong. I think that the zeal you may see on the part of people in RL or on the forum comes from their desire to see the ECC’s reclaim their own traditions, which were sometimes lost because of Latinization. As for those who convert to or change
sui iuris church to the EC, they usually do so because they want to live according to the particular Eastern traditions of a given EC Church (I speak broadly). I say usually, because there are some cases where people really are trying to “escape” the NO (I do not advocate this, in the least), and some of these persons appreciate the Eastern traditions more than others.
I do think that it is unfair to say that people who genuinely change sui iuris church, have an anti-Latin attitude; if what you mean is that they object to the Latin Church in any way. It would be odd for someone to claim communion with the Latin Church, but then dis it, and visa versa. It is true to say that some have an anti-Latinization attitude, but this is not the same as an anti-Latin attitude. I might add that no one is trying to rip the rosaries out of the hands of old ladies. To say that Latinizations should be removed or played down, is not to advocate depriving those who have always known these practices.
Perhaps you could elaborate if I have miss read you.
Yes, I agree that more conservative people may be attracted to the East, but the reasons to join are more complex than that. I know of a few conservative Latin parishes, and I think that if your spirituality is truly Latin, then that is the way you should go as a convert. I knew only a couple of Protestants who directly converted to an EC, among the many Eastern Catholics I have met, and both had equal access to the variety of rites. Each one choose the Church with the Rite, which “spoke” best to them. Neither, is, as you say, anti-Latin.
God Bless,
Rosemary