1
1ke
Guest
I don’t think this explains the Eastern Rite Catholic Churches existence or practice. They do not kneel and have never kneeled. And yet, they witness to the Real Presence just fine.I only said that the Protestent unbelief in the Real Presence was heretical. I am saying that the Pope’s example is closer to the Catholic practice of kneeling before God—something that Protestents who deny the Real Presence would never do.
The non sequitur to which you refer does follow. If our actions are indistinguishable from those who do not believe in the Real Presence we are missing an opportunity to witness our faith in the Real Presence.
You are trying to equate the Catholic posture of standing with a Protestant posture. It has neither the same history nor significance. Protestants reject kneeeling for a whole host of reasons that don’t have anything to do with the Real Presence. Some believe in the Real Presence and yet they stand.
I think instead you should be looking at the Catholic posture of standing from its historical origins in the Church, not based on what Protestants do.
Yes. I am.Forum Elder, huh?
So what is the point of your post?Let’s every body just stay focused. Kneeling before God is a good thing, and “Hence any baptized Catholic who is not prevented by law must be admitted to Holy Communion. Therefore, it is not licit to deny Holy Communion to any of Christ’s faithful solely on the grounds, for example, that the person wishes to receive the Eucharist kneeling or standing.” (Paragraph 91) I’ll obey the part that says it’s not licit to deny Holy Communion to a “kneeler”.
You obiviously are not open to opinions that include standing according to the norms established by the Bishops.