A
Alizarin
Guest
Why is the former anathema to Catholics while the latter is, so far as I can see (though I may be wrong), a commonly accepted view?
Because the former is false and the latter is true.Why is the former anathema to Catholics while the latter is, so far as I can see (though I may be wrong), a commonly accepted view?
Because they are of different natures. Salvation is the journey we take towards heaven with the pilgrim Church on earth and baptism are the shoes permanently fitted to take that journey.Why is the former anathema to Catholics while the latter is, so far as I can see (though I may be wrong), a commonly accepted view?
It doesn’t mean that you will automatically believe the Catholic faith for your whole life, but rather, that the ontological change that was made at your Baptism cannot be unmade.Why is the former anathema to Catholics while the latter is, so far as I can see (though I may be wrong), a commonly accepted view?
Actually, I think it is confirmation that makes you Catholic. That is when you are sealed with the cross on your forehead. From that moment on you carry that mark with you, even into Hell if you go there.This whole once Catholic, always Catholic hurts my feelings. When it is explained people say that it is because you are baptized Catholic. Well, I wasn’t. I had a valid baptism and the Church recognizes it, but it wasn’t done at a Catholic Church by a Catholic priest. When it is explained that you are once Catholic, always Catholic because of your baptism, it makes me feel like I’m not fully Catholic. Kinda hurts.Can this be explained differently for us converts?
Cool, that makes sense.You become Catholic at your baptism and do not necessarily realize it until a later date when you undergo your catechizing. If a child inherits a will from their parent, they may not know about it until a later date, but the will was always written to them from the beginning.
Any valid Baptism.Why doesn’t an assent to the Christian faith (faith in Jesus as savior) have the same indelible mark as Catholic baptism?
Because baptism works an ontological, spiritual change regardless of the recipient’s will or knowledge of if. An assent to the Christian faith is a pure act of the will, and that can change over time. One free will to walk into the house of God, and free will to walk out again. The Scriptures provide support for the idea that baptism marks a permanent change (born of water and of spirit), they do not provide any support for the idea of OSAS, which is why the idea remains a view espoused by a very small minority among even Protestants, and is not the view of the historic Church be in Catholic or Orthodox.Why doesn’t an assent to the Christian faith (faith in Jesus as savior) have the same indelible mark as Catholic baptism?
A person baptized with the Trinitarian formula (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is validly baptized, even if it was outside of a Catholic Church, therefore at that instant, they become Catholic, even though they are not cognizant of it, in the same way that a cradle Catholic that was baptized as an infant is not cognizant of it. It is a loving gift from God all the same. Baptism is perhaps expressed most perfectly when a person is not aware of it, because it all the more displays the unearned, freely given grace of God upon mankind.Why doesn’t an assent to the Christian faith (faith in Jesus as savior) have the same indelible mark as Catholic baptism?
Protestants are Catholic, but they don’t know it?A person baptized with the Trinitarian formula (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) is validly baptized, even if it was outside of a Catholic Church, therefore at that instant, they become Catholic, even though they are not cognizant of it,
If they are validly baptized, then yes, they are Catholic. Eastern Orthodox are also Catholic.Protestants are Catholic, but they don’t know it?