Once Saved Always Saved?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shocktrooper
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
No. My conclusion is that the elect cannot lose their salvation.

That is also the conclusion of the Roman Catholic Church in its doctrine of election to eternal blessedness, a doctrine you must believe de fide.
Of course the elect can’t lose their salvation-the question is, who are the elect?
 
No. My conclusion is that the elect cannot lose their salvation.
Well then, if
[BIBLEDRB]1 Tim 2:3-4[/BIBLEDRB]
Then tell me why the population of hell is greater than zero.
That is also the conclusion of the Roman Catholic Church in its doctrine of election to eternal blessedness, a doctrine you must believe de fide.
Why don’t you show us where in the CCC it says that?

NOTE: If you are deliberately misrepresenting Catholic doctrine, you may have a report filed on you.
 
Well then, if
[BIBLEDRB]1 Tim 2:3-4[/BIBLEDRB]
Then tell me why the population of hell is greater than zero.
That’s a non-sequitur. The population of hell being greater than zero has no bearing on the fact of the elect’s inability to lose salvation.
Why don’t you show us where in the CCC it says that?

NOTE: If you are deliberately misrepresenting Catholic doctrine, you may have a report filed on you.
You can read about the Roman Catholic Dogma of predestination here: Catholic Encyclopedia: Catholic dogma of predestination
 
I’ve been talking about election.
1 Tim 2:3-4 says that God wills all to be saved.
You say that everyone God wills to be saved is saved.
Yet there is a hell.

Reconcile.
 
1 Tim 2:3-4 says that God wills all to be saved.
You say that everyone God wills to be saved is saved.
Yet there is a hell.

Reconcile.
1 Tim 2:3-4 says that God wills all to be saved.
Yet there is a hell, with men in it.

Reconcile.
 
Non-sequitur.
No, it follows perfectly because God is the only one who has100% knowledge of our salvation, as has been previously discussed on this thread, making any concept of election purely an academic one.
 
It follows perfectly because God is the only one who has100% knowledge of our salvation, as has been previously discussed on this thread, making any concept of election an academic one.
What you said is a non-sequitur.

I’ve been talking about “OSAS,” and election, not Luther or Calvin.
 
What you said is a non-sequitur.

I’ve been talking about election, not Luther or Calvin.
The point was that Luther and Calvin surely must’ve considered themselves to be numbered among the elect but Catholics don’t believe we can know that with 100% certainty about ourselves or anyone else.
 
1 Tim 2:3-4 says that God wills all to be saved.
Yet there is a hell, with men in it.

Reconcile.
Man has free will and can choose to reject salvation by committing a mortal sin.
 
The point was that Luther and Calvin surely must’ve considered themselves to be numbered among the elect but Catholics don’t believe we can know that with 100% certainty about ourselves or anyone else.
That’s too bad. Jesus, and the apostle John say one can know.
 
No, that’s the point. We can have a great deal of assurance but we can’t know, even about ourselves.
Sorry, but Jesus and the apostle John say the we can know about ourselves.

I’m going with what they say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top