Once Saved, Always Saved

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeahInancsi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Roman_Catholic:
This may be leading off topic a bit but since this is a OSAS thread and I didnt want to start a new thread, can anyone tell me if the assembly of God follows the OSAS doctrine? What protestants churches follow this? Or is this something that the protestant churches just leave up to its members to decide to believe it or not?
Thanks
It’s primarily from your hard-liner protestants such “Church of God”, “Assembly of God”, Pentecostals, and other cultish acting denominations.
Yes, but a person with a new heart is unlikely to also be a murderer, so it’s problematical as a hypothetical question. OSAS folks like to refer to King David, who repented because he was one of God’s own.
My experience with the above groups usually say
“He was not really saved to begin with”
That’s been their way out argument when cornered.

tsk, tsk, tsk 😦
 
40.png
Godfrey:
That sounds kind of unfair
“Protestants” are Christians and people, too
There are plenty of non-Catholic Christians that are more reasonable in their views.

I was one.
I never demeaned or condemned Catholics when I didn’t agree with them and many like myself were only too happy to discuss and dialogue issues w/o fighting.

There are good things I learned from those days that will always be with me - I don’t regret them.

Peace
The board in question originally accepted Catholics in it’s beginning…now they know that Catholics that join are very well versed in scripture and logic…so we are a force they whether not deal with unless they have to. I registered as a Baptist there just to check stuff out… :eek: and make a few comments 😉 Most of them actually believe the “Chick Tracts” to be the Gospel! :bigyikes:
 
40.png
Kevan:
My background is OSAS.It’s like physical birth. You cannot stop being a child of your father. If you disobey, you are chastened and trained, but the relationship is irrevocable.

To pass from death unto life. It’s an event, the Holy Spirit takes up residence in the soul, sins are forgiven, and you get a new heart.Yes, but a person with a new heart is unlikely to also be a murderer, so it’s problematical as a hypothetical question. OSAS folks like to refer to King David, who repented because he was one of God’s own.OSAS folks are very big on confession and forgiveness, but they consider that to be necessary for fellowship with the Father, just like in a human relationship. A wayward child is still a child, but he can wander out of fellowship with his father through disobedience.

There have been half a hundred threads on this topic here and the arguments against OSAS are massive. As a Protestant, I encourage Catholics to distinguish sharply between OSAS and sola fide. Many, perhaps most, evangelicals do not believe in OSAS, which shows that the doctrine is not an intrinsic part of the Protestant/evangelical/Fundamentalist view of salvation and sola fide.
Back to the original topic. 🙂 The form of OSAS that I was taught was essentially as Kevan states it. He is not describing the type of OSAS in which a person can commit horrific sins and still be saved. Kevan is saying that once a person is saved then he or she will undergo a miraculous change of the heart brought on my the holy spirit.

When I was a protestant the logic of this belief bothered me. I was told that a person who falls away from Christianity is not considered to have ever truly believed in the first place. This bothered me. Even on this board, there was a poster who stated that a person who fell away had probably only converted because his/her friends did and couldn’t have had any real faith to begin with. Yet if you talk to former Christians you will discover that many did have strong internal feelings at the time of their conversion and did try to follow God. They had that same type of salvation experience that Protestants look for. To not believe them is to sit judgment over their hearts and is something that we, as Christians, aren’t allowed to do.

Another thing that bothered me is that OSAS puts limits on God. The Holy Spirit will change me enough that I don’t want to commit big sins and fall away but I will still have the smaller sins to fight against. This made no sense to me. Why wouldn’t God simply perfect me completely when he changed my heart?

Some forms of OSAS can lead to a fanatical form of fundamentalism. This is because the only way that you can see if you are a Christian is by the way that your life changes. Therefore, members of some congregations, look at their members outer behavior to judge if they are a Christian. Such a person is put under a lot of stress to attend church every service, follow the pastor’s interpretation of the bible, dress like everyone else and believe the same as their church members. To do otherwise is to open yourself up to doubts from your fellow church members and your own self, that your salvation wasn’t true.

Sometimes we come across these people o this board. They are the Protestants-again not all OSAS believers are like this-who ask how Catholics can drink, dance, play cards,(insert favorite sin here) and still be Christian. They are coming from the view that a person who is really Christian will not wish to do the things that their particular church has deemed a sin. This thought process makes such people extremly judgemental and controlling, which is sad because many do have a strong desire to follow God.
 
Leahlnansci:
I need a Protestant whose religion believes that once a person is “saved”, he is always “saved” to answer a couple questions for me:
  1. Explain the concept of “once saved, always saved”?
Once you are truly saved, you are always saved.

Leahlnansci said:
2. What constitutes “being saved”?

Being declared righteous by God through faith in Jesus Christ.

Leahlnansci said:
3. What happens if a person kills someone else for no reason after they’ve been saved? Will they still be admitted to heaven?

Catholics believe they are saved, what happens to Catholic who does what you describe?

Leahlnansci said:
4. How does a religion function without Confession and the forgiveness of sins?

I never new that Protestants did not have confession and the forgiveness of sins.

Sandusky
 
40.png
sandusky:
Catholics believe they are saved, what happens to Catholic who does what you describe?
If they do not confess their sin, do penance and repent, they will go to hell.
sanducky:
I never new that Protestants did not have confession and the forgiveness of sins.
How do you confess? Do you confess to the minister/preacher?
 
40.png
LeahInancsi:
How do you confess? Do you confess to the minister/preacher?
Generally, I confess my sins to God; if needed, I confess to the person against whom I have sinned; if I notice a pattern of sin, I will take it to my wife, or to a friend, or to a pastor as well, and ask that he or she check with me from time to time, and hold me accountable not to commit that particular sin again.

Sandusky
 
Aren’t you “confessing” your sin to God as soon as you commit it? If you know it’s a sin at the time, and that God knows you’re doing it but you follow through with whatever particular act it is anyway in spite of all this… What difference does merely acknowledging it again sometime later on make?
 
40.png
exoflare:
Aren’t you “confessing” your sin to God as soon as you commit it?
Yes. He is available to hear confession 24/7.
40.png
exoflare:
If you know it’s a sin at the time, and that God knows you’re doing it but you follow through with whatever particular act it is anyway in spite of all this…
I didn’t say anything like what you are saying; what is your point?
40.png
exoflare:
What difference does merely acknowledging it again sometime later on make?
Again, I did not say anything like that; “merely acknowledging it again sometime later on” are your words.
 
40.png
sandusky:
Yes. He is available to hear confession 24/7.

I didn’t say anything like what you are saying; what is your point?

Again, I did not say anything like that; “merely acknowledging it again sometime later on” are your words.
Okay I’ll try to speak in more simple terms.

You replied “yes” to my first question… so does that mean that by committing an act that you know is a sin (thus, implicitly confessing that sin to God at the very same time), you are automatically forgiven at that moment for whatever sin you have just committed?
 
exoflare [/quote said:
Okay I’ll try to speak in more simple terms.

You replied “yes” to my first question… so does that mean that by committing an act that you know is a sin (thus, implicitly confessing that sin to God at the very same time), you are automatically forgiven at that moment for whatever sin you have just committed?

Yes.

Read 2 Sam Ch.11-Ch.12:13; I will include the pertinent verse:

2 Samuel 12:13
13 Then David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord." And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has taken away your sin; you shall not die.
(cf Lev 20:10; 24:17; Pro 28:13; Mic 7:18).

There is no partiality with God (Rom 2:11); He forgives me as He forgave David, no priest, no penance; moreover, David’s sins were what you refer to as “mortal;” how much more will He also forgive sins that you refer to as “venial” in the same manner?

Sandusky
 
sandusky said:
2 Samuel 12:13
13 Then David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the Lord." And Nathan said to David, “The Lord also has taken away your sin; you shall not die.
(cf Lev 20:10; 24:17; Pro 28:13; Mic 7:18).

There is no partiality with God (Rom 2:11); He forgives me as He forgave David, no priest, no penance; moreover, David’s sins were what you refer to as “mortal;” how much more will He also forgive sins that you refer to as “venial” in the same manner?

Sandusky

Same manner…? Did you notice the “said to Nathan” part? What does this have to do with being forgiven the instant you sin?
 
40.png
exoflare:
Same manner…? Did you notice the “said to Nathan” part? What does this have to do with being forgiven the instant you sin?
What do mean by this?

Sandusky
 
40.png
sandusky:
What do mean by this?

Sandusky
The verse you cited. He was confessing his sin to Nathan, not purely in his thoughts AKA “directly to God”.
 
And the next verse, Nathan issues a penance…wow…early confession with an assertion of penance…never saw that before…Truely the new testament is a fulfillment of the old and our Catholic church is the fulfillment of the Church established by God in the Levites!
 
40.png
exoflare:
The verse you cited. He was confessing his sin to Nathan, not purely in his thoughts AKA “directly to God”.
Psalm 32:3-5 (by King David)

3 When I kept silent about my sin, my body wasted away through my groaning all day long.
4 For day and night Your hand was heavy upon me; my vitality was drained away as with the fever heat of summer.
5 I acknowledged my sin to you, and my iniquity I did not hide; I said, “I will confess my transgressions to the Lord”; and you forgave the guilt of my sin.

The Lord, brethren, stands in need of nothing; and He desires nothing of any one, except that confession be made to Him. For, says the elect David, “I will confess unto the Lord; and that will please Him more than a young bullock that hath horns and hoofs. Let the poor see it, and be glad.”


Clement (known by Paul: Php 4:3) in his First Epistle to the Corinthians
 
40.png
LeahInancsi:
I received my response from baptistboard.com. See below:

Hello,

*Unfortunately, your recent registration application at BaptistBoard.com *
*has been declined. There may be many reasons your requests was declined *
*including but not limited to a incomplete profile or a incompatible *
*belief system. Please keep in mind that the BaptistBoard.com is a private *
*forum and we reserve the right to reject any application for any *
*reason. If you feel that this decision is incorrect please feel free to reply *
*to this email. In your reply include your reasoning as to why we should *
*reconsider you for membership. *
Go back to the board Under religion just put CHRISTIAN. Thats how I got on an I’m a Catholic.
 
40.png
LeahInancsi:
I need a Protestant whose religion believes that once a person is “saved”, he is always “saved” to answer a couple questions for me:
  1. Explain the concept of “once saved, always saved”?
Basically exactly how it sounds. Once you’ve been saved, there’s nothing you can do to lose your salvation. Protestants feel that, since you didn’t earn it in the first place, you can’t lose your salvation.
40.png
LeahInancsi:
  1. What constitutes “being saved”?
A person needs to recognize that they are a sinner. They need to realize that they deserve to go to Hell, and that there’s nothing they can do to earn God’s favor or earn a place in Heaven. They then realize that Jesus died on the cross to save them from their sins and from Hell. The person then has to pray to Jesus, saying that they believe this, ask Jesus to forgive their sins, and then ask Jesus to come into their hearts.
40.png
LeahInancsi:
  1. What happens if a person kills someone else for no reason after they’ve been saved? Will they still be admitted to heaven?
Most “once saved, always saved” Protestants would dodge that question. They would argue that a person who has really been saved, really repented of their sins, and really has accepted Jesus into their heart would never sin. IMO, This is one of the major problems with this doctrine, since it simply did not follow my experience. After I accepted Jesus into my heart, I wasn’t perfect. I kept wondering if I had really repented from my sins since I would still struggle with sin, and find myself occasionally going back to old habits.
40.png
LeahInancsi:
  1. How does a religion function without Confession and the forgiveness of sins?
Most people who hold to “once saved, always saved” still believe in asking Christ for forgiveness from sins that you’ve committed after you’ve been saved. But they don’t believe that their sins have any bearing on their salvation. They don’t hold that you need to confess your sins to someone else to gain forgiveness of sins, they believe that you can go directly to God. However, in Protestant churches, there has been a growing trend of accountabillity partners. Basically, a person picks a good Christian friend to ask them about their relationship with Christ, if they sin, give them advice and keep them accountable. But they don’t ask the other person for absolution. However, accountabillity partners are recommended, not required.
 
valient Lucy:
They don’t hold that you need to confess your sins to someone else to gain forgiveness of sins, they believe that you can go directly to God. However, in Protestant churches, there has been a growing trend of accountabillity partners. Basically, a person picks a good Christian friend to ask them about their relationship with Christ, if they sin, give them advice and keep them accountable. But they don’t ask the other person for absolution. However, accountabillity partners are recommended, not required.
Catholics don’t believe that they are asking a “person” for absolution. A priest or a bishop is an extension (need better word) of God. The sacrament of Confession is a more elaborate means of asking God for forgiveness than prayer. Less serious sins (venial sins) are forgiven by prayer.

In my mind, the Catholic method of confession is more fulfilling because you get immediate feedback and a penance to perform for you sins. In my life, the act of having to go to God, i.e., priest, face to face and confessing my mortal sins acts as a deterent. Going to Confession is not an easy thing to do. It should be very difficult to tell someone who you admire more than all others that you have done wrong, especially in the case of mortal sins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top