E
EBC
Guest
How should we Catholics respond to the statement “We all worship One God; only that we take different way. That’s why we should respect one another (i.e. Religious Tolerance).”?
Given the eyewitness testimony regarding the observed miracles of Christ, the scriptural evidence both predicting and supporting His actions, the inherent wisdom of His words, and the positive change He causes in the human heart, His claim to be “the Way, the Truth and the Life” must be seriously considered by anyone seeking a belief system. Buddha, for example, taught similar things, but offered no salvation. All other beliefs have some flaw or lack that leaves a human desire unanswered.How should we Catholics respond to the statement “We all worship One God; only that we take different way. That’s why we should respect one another (i.e. Religious Tolerance).”?
Um, in Buddism…the whole point is release from the cycle of reincarnation–from hell and any other consequences of one’s actions/beliefs–which, guess what, they usually call salvation.Buddha, for example, taught similar things, but offered no salvation.
Point well taken. However, can you lose Buddhist salvation by ceasing to be released? Or ceasing the desire to be released?Um, in Buddism…the whole point is release from the cycle of reincarnation–from hell and any other consequences of one’s actions/beliefs–which, guess what, they usually call salvation.
No it’s not the same salvation, but it’s definitely salvation in essentially the sense Christians mean, allowing for the different cosmology involved.
I’d argue that the only problem with Buddhism is it’s not that great a philosophy–and it’s kinda quitter-y, considering salvation is achieved by not desiring anymore.
Not permanently; they tend to view reality as cyclical.Point well taken. However, can you lose Buddhist salvation by ceasing to be released? Or ceasing the desire to be released?
Thank you. My knowledge of Buddhism is obviously limited, and comes from conversations with Korean Christians, who know a lot more about it than I.Not permanently; they tend to view reality as cyclical.
But my point was they do offer salvation, even if they happen to be mistaken.
Not necessarily; Buddhism was brutally suppressed in Korea for three hundred years, and most Koreans, especially in the cities, still look down on it as a “hick religion”–and the equivalent of “hick” is one of the nastiest insults in Korean. Shamanism, too; the two religions tend to go together in what the Japanese call Shinbutsu-shugyo or “Gods and Buddhas together”. It’d be “Shinbul-seunhap” in Korean, but I don’t think the term actually exists.Thank you. My knowledge of Buddhism is obviously limited, and comes from conversations with Korean Christians, who know a lot more about it than I.
Expressing different beliefs (without using force or violence) is not intolerance. The only thing that matters in this case is: what is God’s will? God never says: there are different ways to me or believe in whatever you want. He says that we can be saved only in Jesus’ name; and we should try to get to heaven through the narrow gate as the Sccripture says.How should we Catholics respond to the statement “We all worship One God; only that we take different way. That’s why we should respect one another (i.e. Religious Tolerance).”?
No, thats what I call a logical observation.People have no choice in their beliefs? Is this what you claim as your religious dogma?
Ok. Have you been brainwashed? How did you come up with your agnostic beliefs?No, thats what I call a logical observation.
85+% of people born & brainwashed into islam, “chooses” to remain a muslim. Is that a genuine choice? Or has the choice been programmed in them already?
Same with 85+% of people born & brainwashed into Catholicm.
Same with 85+% of people born & brainwashed into Hinduism.
etc, etc etc.
I was. I used to be Catholic.Ok. Have you been brainwashed?
Disillusionment (the only way out of brainwashing) and research.How did you come up with your agnostic beliefs?
And that is your opinion, not a fact…Religion is a matter of opinion, rather than fact.