I
Iheartcoffee
Guest
Simcha Fisher came out with an e-book about NFP that is really good. She mentions how ridiculous the term “contraceptive mentality” is. It’s a good read.
So it would be correct to say that a single person doesn’t really have to worry about being open to life due to their current state in life? I’m not suggesting that one (I) should not learn and understand Church teaching about marriage, especially if one’s (my) vocation is marriage, but it’s not something that actually concerns a Catholic who is single.When you use it as the Chuch uses it, it is clear: each marriage act must be open per se too the transmission of life.
When people say it, they say the couple must be open to life.
A single person - assuming they are chaste of course - has no way of being open to life since being open to life concerns the sexual act, as 1ke explained above. In other words, being open to life means not using ABC and engaging in sexual acts that do not end in vaginal intercourse. I think this is as technical explanation as we can give.So it would be correct to say that a single person doesn’t really have to worry about being open to life due to their current state in life? I’m not suggesting that one (I) should not learn and understand Church teaching about marriage, especially if one’s (my) vocation is marriage, but it’s not something that actually concerns a Catholic who is single.
I’m so glad she is debunking this myth, because so many of her fellow mom-bloggers promote this idea.Simcha Fisher came out with an e-book about NFP that is really good. She mentions how ridiculous the term “contraceptive mentality” is. It’s a good read.
I have never been married I had to have a complete hysterectemy due to cancer when I was 28 years old and believe me if I ever do get married it will be in the Catholic church I was going through private instruction in the Catholic faith when I had my surgery.If I’m not mistaken, a woman who is physically unable to conceive and bear children may not marry in the Church. If it happens after marriage, that’s different.
You are most definitely mistaken.If I’m not mistaken, a woman who is physically unable to conceive and bear children may not marry in the Church.
In the marriage rite the couple vows to “accept children lovingly from God”. God sends some children into families through biology, others through adoption. The couple has to be open to God’s will in the matter. Maybe they will have biological children. Maybe they will adopt. Some people are called to become parents both ways. Or maybe it will be neither, because God has another plan for them altogether.I’m curious, especially from you ladies - what would openness to life look like if you knew you couldn’t have children? Say in a situation where a woman had a prior hysterectomy and then gets married. How would you go about being open to life in a marriage knowing that biologically you couldn’t conceive?
Your friend has a wonderful attitude! I’m in my 40s and have never been married. I have gynecological problems which would have made getting pregnant quite a challenge, if not impossible, when I was younger.I feel like I’m on a personal crusade against that one.
I have a friend who is married and can’t conceive. She and her husband have decided, after a lot of prayer, to not do anything about it and just let nature do its thing. If she miraculously gets pregnant - wonderful! If not - they will accept that and live without children. They have decided not to adopt or foster because of their circumstances. She has told me that because she is childless she feels like a mother hen to young single people at her parish, and does what she can to make them feel welcome, especially if they are students living far away from home. She is also quite keen to help mothers with young children.