She really didnāt make a point. She did make a point, I heard it. Other than, for her, it was a fad that passed and therefore isnāt necessary any longer. Did you read the same post that I read? Many people feel differently. Catholic women all over the world covered their hair in church for over 1,900 years. The custom and some believe obligation, was thrown out the window with the baby and the bathtub 40 years ago, many young women are reclaiming that custom today. Not because anyone is telling them to, but because they want to.
She clearly had an axe to grind by her tone. None of the posts I have read on these forums regarding veiling demand that all women must veil-or else, so I donāt understand her disgust. What disgust? Since when have women always veiled in this country? JoanREDirector correctly pointed out that there is nothing particularly Catholic about wearing a lace matilla or a smaller circular lace (or a Kleenex tissue for that matter.) What she was saying was that women covered their heads, not necessarily with a lace veil. Most of the posts have been by young women, who either describe veiling as something they āfeel called to,ā or a way of serving God, or a way of feeling connected with Catholic women throughout history. All valid points and a personal decision that women make for themselves in their service of Our Lord. What about the husbandās comment that it looks sexy? āVeilingā should be done for the right reason not because of fashion or a fad nor because it ālooks sexyā. There was no need for that sort of tone, it was clear she finds the whole idea very threatening because it isnāt something she does and doesnāt feel necessary. You are way off base. There was no such implication in what she wrote. We get that. The only part of her message that was particularly relevant was her closing comment, about a woman being free to veil and hoping her husband is supportive.
Her screen name alludes to being a director of religious education. We donāt need hostility when teaching religion, especially to children or converts.

She clearly teaches from a stand point of, āI donāt doāso you donāt have toā¦ā Rather than the positive,

āThis has been the way and is an acceptable way to practice your faith.ā I think it is one of the indicators of why parish education continues to fail in its mission to pass on the faith. There is no question that Religious Education has failed at times, but you are out of bounds on these accusations. The lack of good, solid teaching has had disastrous consequences and when one reads negative rants toward people trying to do something positive, one has to wonder where to lay blame. I think, in part, it begins with these types of RE program directors. You have no basis for making such remarks without justification.