This is what I am struggling with in my research of OD. The truth is out there somewhere. I tend to believe there is a gray area in regards to people giving negative testimonies but their particular experience may have been skewed by either mental illness (a very real possibility), misguided notions as to what they thought OD was about before they joined. Or perhaps these people just have a grudge against OD and the RCC in general and are simply stirring the waters with half-truths.
I am determined to get to the bottom of it all, if I can. The facts, as I see them thus far, are:
Fact: Scott Hahn, a highly respected, rational scholar is a member of OD and speaks very highly of his experience in his book Ordinary Work, Extraordinary Work (which I haven’t finished)
Fact: Several Popes, up to and including, B XVI, have “signed off” on OD as being a kind of panacea to today’s malaise of consumerism and relativist thought. A stronghold of traditional thought and practices.
Fact: Anti-Catholic attitudes have been the source of many ODAN type organizations in the past. Why would OD be treated any differently since it’s a Catholic institution?
I imagine the strongest critics of OD would be the ‘liberal’ catholics. These people are likely to support abortion, birth control or freedom of thought and choice, but who ultimately can’t stand that Rome tells them how they should be living their lives…which is the Pope’s job!
Sorry, I guess I don’t have a point this post. I am just airing my thoughts. After all, the thread is call “Opus Dei”