Well, he says he will remain a practicing Catholic. In charity, one would assume that he has either fallen in love with a woman or plans to start dating and find a spouse…with no intention of engaging in sexual sin. We are all called to chastity - former priests included.So…does he already have a woman lined up to marry, or does he plan on just fornicating?
In Christ,
Ellen
I thought that only the Pope could dispense a priest from his promise of celibacy. I think I read in another thread here that a priest could validly enter into a marriage, but it would be illicit (unless he was laicized & dispensed I would guess).Well, he says he will remain a practicing Catholic. In charity, one would assume that he has either fallen in love with a woman or plans to start dating and find a spouse…with no intention of engaging in sexual sin. We are all called to chastity - former priests included.
Does anyone know the canonical status for a resigning priest? If he resigns and intends to breaks his vow, is he then free to marry? Or, does he have to get something similar to an annulment?
Incorrect. he could never marry validly without the proper dispensation(s).I thought that only the Pope could dispense a priest from his promise of celibacy. I think I read in another thread here that a priest could validly enter into a marriage, but it would be illicit (unless he was laicized & dispensed I would guess).
I agree. From the article, I didn’t see anything negative being said - just that he struggled with the decision. I hope this is the case, and that he doesn’t become a voice of dissension.Don’t be too hard on him. I would much rather that priests who are abandoning their vocations and mission be honest about it than try to remain in the priesthood, collect a paycheck from the parish and spout anti-catholic opinions from the pulpit. He’s at least being honest.
I don’t know, I got the information from a brother on this site. Remember, a secular priest only makes a promise of celibacy, not a vow. Since marriage is a vow, it would “override” a promise (it would definitely be illicit though without a dispensation).Incorrect. he could never marry validly without the proper dispensation(s).
I believe I would have to differ with that quote. A secular priest is still a priest and has received Holy Orders. Holy Orders seems to be an impediment to marraige. He would need to be laicized to attempt a valid marriage.I don’t know, I got the information from a brother on this site. Remember, a secular priest only makes a promise of celibacy, not a vow. Since marriage is a vow, it would “override” a promise (it would definitely be illicit though without a dispensation).
Celibacy and the priestly ministry is a sacrifice …Saying he could “no longer live the celibate life”, Portland, Oregon, pastor Fr Tom Harley has announced that he has celebrated his last mass.
More…
This is an interesting research project. I may point to the fact that a secular priest, otherwise known as diocesan priest, could in fact be married. However, the fact that celibacy is a discipline may have something to do with this. However, assuming what you’ve said is accurate [true], I don’t know without digging deeper at this point.I don’t know, I got the information from a brother on this site. Remember, a secular priest only makes a promise of celibacy, not a vow. Since marriage is a vow, it would “override” a promise (it would definitely be illicit though without a dispensation).
Where in the article does it say that he is currently sleeping with anyone?So…does he already have a woman lined up to marry, or does he plan on just fornicating?
That is interesting. St Clare’s is not even a big parish. Now, if Fr Slider at St Agatha said he was quitting his marriage in favor of celibacy because he just couldn’t handle being a pastor and a husband, that would be big news.The most glaring & *interesting *aspect of this story, I think, is the fact it is published front page, right under the fold, with a photo, in The Oregonian. The Oregonian is out of Portland and the biggest newspaper south of Seattle and north of San Fran.
The article says he’s leaving the priesthood because he can no longer live his vow of celibacy. So, unless he’s got a marriage already in the works, he’s still going to be celibate for quite awhile, as that’s the same call to chastity that unmarried nonpriests and nonreligious are called to, as well (no Catholics are supposed to be masturbating, either, in case you’re thinking he can go that route). Just seems kind of fishy, is all (the whole front page story thing seems a bit much, too, as another poster pointed out).Where in the article does it say that he is currently sleeping with anyone?
And, of course, I assume you’re not limiting celibacy to simply not having sex…