Original Sin

  • Thread starter Thread starter bamark
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bamark

Guest
Let me try a new one.

The sin of Adam in Genesis 3 was Original.

As Paul said in Romans 5:12: “Wherefore as by one man sin entered into this world, and by sin death; and so death passed upon all men, in whom all have sinned.”

Now look at verses 15 - 19.
15 But not as the offence, so also the gift. For if by the offence of one, many died; much more the grace of God, and the gift, by the grace of one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

16 And not as it was by one sin, so also is the gift. For judgment indeed was by one unto condemnation; but grace is of many offences, unto justification.

17 For if by one man’s offence death reigned through one; much more they who receive abundance of grace, and of the gift, and of justice, shall reign in life through one, Jesus Christ.

18 Therefore, as by the offence of one, unto all men to condemnation; so also by the justice of one, unto all men to justification of life.

19 For as by the disobedience of one man, many were made sinners; so also by the obedience of one, many shall be made just.

Who did it bring condemnation for, Adam only? No, verse 18 says, “Therefore, as by the offence of one, unto all men to condemnation; so also by the justice of one, unto all men to justification of life.”

This is stated even more clearly in the KJV: “Therefore, as by the offense of one, judgment came upon all men to condemnation.”

Because of Adam’s sin, all men were made subject to sin and death. That is original sin.

We are all the seed of Adam. Therefore, we have inherited this sin.

The catechism says: “original sin is called ‘sin’ only in an analogical sense: it is a sin ‘contracted’ and not ‘committed’—a state and not an act” (CCC 404).

There is a parallel in 1 Cor 15:21–22: “For as by a man came death, by a man has come also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive.”

There are two verses in Hebrews 7 that further explain the concept of how we are “in” Adam.

Hebrews 7: 9-10, This refers to when Abraham and Melchizedek met in Genesis 14: "One might even say that Levi himself, who receives tithes, was tithed through Abraham, for he was still in his father’s loins when Melchizedek met him.

Levi wasn’t born for another seventy years after this happened. Yet the Bible says that Levi paid tithes to Melchizedek. Levi was in Abraham—in his loins, according to the Bible.

We are born with a fallen nature as a result of Adam’s sin. We are born of Adam’s body into condemnation. We are born of Christ’s body unto salvation.

Are Catholics guilty of the concept of “automatic imputation”?
In other words, because Adam sinned then do we assume that sin (and the guilt of sin) is automatically passed on to all men and therefore all are born dead to God and condemned.

If this is true, then are Catholics beliefs consistent by claiming that because of Jesus’ righteousness (as opposed to Adam’s sin), all men should have righteousness automatically imputed to them as well.

Thanks
 
I’m a simple guy and I like to explain things in a simple way (you know, talk slow and use small words). Anyway, here’s the way I see it:

Adam was created with his soul in a state of grace, which of course, he lost when he ate the apple. He maintained the capacity to receive that grace, even though he didn’t.

Adam can not pass on to his descendents something that he no longer has, so all his children are born without this grace, but we are born with the capacity to receive that grace by our love for Christ.

Capice?

Notworthy
 
40.png
bamark:
Are Catholics guilty of the concept of “automatic imputation”?
In other words, because Adam sinned then do we assume that sin (and the guilt of sin) is automatically passed on to all men and therefore all are born dead to God and condemned.
You have already noted that the Catechism says this: “original sin is called ‘sin’ only in an analogical sense: it is a sin ‘contracted’ and not ‘committed’—a state and not an act” (CCC 404).

Doesn’t CCC 404 answer your question?
 
40.png
NotWorthy:
I’m a simple guy and I like to explain things in a simple way (you know, talk slow and use small words). Anyway, here’s the way I see it:

Adam was created with his soul in a state of grace, which of course, he lost when he ate the apple. He maintained the capacity to receive that grace, even though he didn’t.

Adam can not pass on to his descendents something that he no longer has, so all his children are born without this grace, but we are born with the capacity to receive that grace by our love for Christ.

Capice?

Notworthy
YES! **
I am a simple gal…like small words and talk slow…this made perfect sense…and the sad part I have waited several years to have it explained like this so
I UNDERSTAND IT**!!!
THANK YOU!!!
 
Are Catholics guilty of the concept of “automatic imputation”?
In other words, because Adam sinned then do we assume that sin (and the guilt of sin) is automatically passed on to all men and therefore all are born dead to God and condemned.
No, not as you state it. What the Church teaches is that man’s nature became corrupted (which leads to death), his intellect darkened (so he does not know God’s will), and his will was weakened (so he needs to properly form his conscience so he will be able to do the will of God).
If this is true, then are Catholics beliefs consistent by claiming that because of Jesus’ righteousness (as opposed to Adam’s sin), all men should have righteousness automatically imputed to them as well.
Again, no, not as you state it. All men have been redeemed by Christ from whom flows all righteousness for all men. Baptism cleanses us from the stain of original sin, allowing us to draw on the graces Christ gained for us by his sacrifice on the cross. The other 6 sacraments do this, as well.

I suggest you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church on the topic if you want to understand the Church’s teachings.
 
Please note that in the Genesis story everything God created on the 1st day was good, the 2nd good, 3rd good, 4th good, 5th good, and the 7th he rested.

God never says on the 6th day when he created man that man was good. It then follows that God looked at everthing he created and it was good. Man by himself is not good. Man in perfect union with the Church is good.

Note that the number 6 in the bible, is 1 less than 7, or imperfecttion vs 7 which is perfection. the number 6 is also for man or sin.

This is number types in the bible the breakdown.
1= Unity, 2= Church, 3 = God / Trinity / Harmony, 4 = everyone, 5 = Christ - also number of disgits on a hand = hand type, 6 is imperfection, man, or sin, 7 = perfection/creation , 8 = new creation (Christ rose on the 8th day, making all things new…
2 times 4 = 8 which means that church times everyone is indicating completness , 9 = 3x3 , harmony of harmonies, fullness, 10 = very much and 12 = family
 
JP3, im confused by what your saying in your list of numbers… but basically Man was created without sin, created good, but still had free will. Eve fell into temptation, and ate the FRUIT(just to emphasize, not an apple). When Man ate the fruit, he cut himself off from God… and yes, taht does show mans imperfection. I doubt anyone ever said (seriously) that man was perfect. But, before the first sin, man was Basically and Completely Good.
 
40.png
Della:
No, not as you state it. What the Church teaches is that man’s nature became corrupted (which leads to death), his intellect darkened (so he does not know God’s will), and his will was weakened (so he needs to properly form his conscience so he will be able to do the will of God).

Again, no, not as you state it. All men have been redeemed by Christ from whom flows all righteousness for all men. Baptism cleanses us from the stain of original sin, allowing us to draw on the graces Christ gained for us by his sacrifice on the cross. The other 6 sacraments do this, as well.

I suggest you read the Catechism of the Catholic Church on the topic if you want to understand the Church’s teachings.
Thank you Della, for your answers. I have read the Cathechism, but I did not see where it defined imputation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top