N
Nine_Two
Guest
Then put your money where your mouth is and prove the correctness of the ultramontane view. I suggest you avoide quoting heretics if you want your cut and pastes to be taken seriously.
- Status
M
mardukm
Guest
Dear brothers Nine_two, Chesterton, and Ferde,
Please permit me the presumption of moderating your discussion.
Brothers Chesterton and Ferde,
You are correct to use those verses to demonstrate that the early Church recognized (as the Catholic Church today) the necessity of submitting questions of doctrine to Rome.
You would be wrong insofar as you are dichotomizing this principle from what I perceive Nine_Two is claiming.
Brother Nine_Two,
I understand where you are coming from. You are correct in using these verses to support the patristic and High Petrine principle that the intervention of Rome comes by appeal, and not by unilateral interference.
You would be wrong insofar as you assume unilateral interference is an axiom of ultramontanism.
Hope that helps.
Blessings,
Marduk
Please permit me the presumption of moderating your discussion.
Brothers Chesterton and Ferde,
You are correct to use those verses to demonstrate that the early Church recognized (as the Catholic Church today) the necessity of submitting questions of doctrine to Rome.
You would be wrong insofar as you are dichotomizing this principle from what I perceive Nine_Two is claiming.
Brother Nine_Two,
I understand where you are coming from. You are correct in using these verses to support the patristic and High Petrine principle that the intervention of Rome comes by appeal, and not by unilateral interference.
You would be wrong insofar as you assume unilateral interference is an axiom of ultramontanism.
Hope that helps.
Blessings,
Marduk
- Status