anthony022071:
It may be significant that Paul asked “If God be for us,who can be against us?” and did not say “God is for us.”
Paul
is saying
"God is for us".
He is anticipating that some will doubt the assurances God is giving; therefore, he asks these questions in v31 to dissuade their doubt, and he anticipates other doubts they may have, and raises the same type of questions further on in the text to assuage those doubts.
His goal is to extinguish
any doubt.
Contextually, the doubt that he dissuades is that someone, or something, can come along and take from the believer the things God has promised to him.
The answer expected to the questions raised is
no one/no thing.
“If,” in v31, is a condition of the first class; so, Paul is not making an uncertain statement, but a certain one.
Thus, it can be stated positively, “Seeing that God is for us, who can be against us?”
Here’s the text:
Romans 8:31-39
***What then shall we say to these things? If God is for us, who is against us?
He who did not spare His own Son, but delivered Him over for us all, how will He not also with
Him freely give us all things?
Who will bring a charge against God’s elect? God is the one who justifies;
who is the one who condemns? Christ Jesus is He who died, yes, rather who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us.
Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?
Just as it is written, “For Your sake we are being put to death all day long; We were considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”
But in all these things we overwhelmingly conquer through Him who loved us.
For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers,
nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.***:extrahappy: