G
guanophore
Guest
This does not make sense, Pub. Why would the father rejoice that he was dead, now alive, if he was not “dead” to him? All parents who have lost children still love them, and many still look for them every day. It does not make them any less “dead”.My own opinion of the matter is that while the son was far off living his life…the Father was still loving him…looking for him each and every day…and when “he saw him a long way off”…the Father ran to him. The son was not “dead” to the Father…the son was “dead” to the life the Father had for him…
It is about ALL those things. Jesus did not put unnecessary elements into his Parables. To say that these other details are unimportant or irrelevant is to cut out part of Jesus’ teaching.The story isn’t about the state of the son who left…OR is it about the state of the son who staryed…BUT about the love and faithfulness of the Father…who evidently knew the son would return home since he looked for him each day so he could run to greet him when he returned.
There is no evidence in this parable that supports your opinionthat the father knew the son would return home. Parents of children who are dead do not know any such thing.
That is one important part of the story that must be grasped. However, sin and how it separates people from the Father is also part of the story.Code:I'm not sure that the story is talking about "mortal sin"....or "venial sin".....but the deep love of the Father for his children....to miss that point is to miss the whole point of the story.
No, we are not “reading in”. We are just choosing not to ignore certain parts of the parable that you seem to think are not "relevant’ to your position.Code:You wish to read other things into the story....that's fine...but it has nothing to do with OSAS...."states of sin" or the such......it's part of the parables Jesus told about the love of the Father....it fits right along side the "Shepherd left the 99 sheep to find the one lost lamb"....or the woman "who swept her whole house to find the one lost coin"
Pub, you can 't get the point of the depth and persistance of God’s mercy unless you recognize that it persists in spite of the sin. It is so marvellous BECAUSE of the sin and separation. Minimizing this does not support the point of the parable.Code:The author of Luke is speaking toward God's love and mercy.....not directly to the "sin" of either son.....and THAT for me is the most wonderful thing about these stories....God searches for "that which was lost"....."that which was dead".....and rejoices when we are found.....or when we come home.....
No, Pub, it does not. The mercy of it is that he loves us even when we are in a state of sin, and are separated from Him. This is an essential point of the parable.Code:To read OSAS or "state of sin" into these very profound simple stories...is to loose sight of the love and faithfulness of the Father in our lostness....
Well, we read it differently, don’t we?Code:If you find your "take" on the parables more compelling....I'm good....I just don't see how the title of your thread has any bearing on the parable....OSAS is not a "BIG PROBLEM" in this parable...it's not addressed at all.:shrug: