Our Next President

  • Thread starter Thread starter BListon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Vangaurdian said:
TV is the land of fantasy. There are no real names to be verified for those “polls” that the media uses to guide the their sheep. Dr. Paul supporters are the ones who show up, they are the ones who actually exist in the real world. There are real names of people being elected as delegates.

FACT = THERE IS NO NOMINEE YET
FANTASY = THERE IS A NOMINEE, AND IT IS WHO THE MEDIA SAYS IT IS

Does everyone now understand the difference between fact and fantasy?
🙂

The alphabet soup is all the same, fox just happens to be the most insidious.
Of course the globalist media prefers Romney, he is politically no different from Obama, except that Obama is designated to win by the media bosses, including Rupert.

Why not go to an event in your state? Why hide behind the media?
For the love of God, talk to real people!

You will find out that a majority of Santorum supporters are receiving a refreshing awakening. Santorum has relinquished control of “his” base - and they are flocking to the cause of LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Click to expand...
Just astonishing!!
 
ishii said:
Yes there are many big differences:

Obama - war on Catholic church
Romney - no war on catholic church.

Obama - gave us justice Elena Kagan
Romney - will nominate justices in mold of Scalia/Alito

Ishii
Click to expand...
Genuine news articles prove your statements completely false.
Note that these articles are reporting his actions AFTER his so called “conversion”.

Romney appoints pro abortion judge.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3279653&page=1
Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney has long cited a November 2004 meeting with a Harvard stem cell researcher as the moment that changed his long-held stance of supporting abortion rights to his current “pro-life” position opposing legal abortion.
Click to expand...
But several actions Romney took mere months after that meeting call into question how deep-seated his conversion truly was.
Click to expand...
Within two months of his epiphany on this issue, Romney appointed to a judgeship a Democrat who was an avowed supporter of abortion rights.
Click to expand...
Romney forces Catholic Hospitals to provide abortion pills
boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/12/09/romney_says_no_hospitals_are_exempt_from_pill_law/
Romney says no hospitals are exempt from pill law
He reverses stand on Plan B
Click to expand...
No Catholic should support this guy.
He will lose to Obama… I’m starting to suspect that is exactly what some of his supporters want.
 
Vangaurdian said:
Genuine news articles prove your statements completely false.
Note that these articles are reporting his actions AFTER his so called “conversion”.

Romney appoints pro abortion judge.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3279653&page=1
Click to expand...
To put this in perspective, Rick Santorum endorsed Arlen Specter for President in 1996 despite the fact that Specter was adamantly pro-choice by any count. Yet no one would question the pro-life authenticity of Santorum even though the presidency is of course much more crucial to the pro-life cause than a lowly district court judgeship. And again, Rudy Giuliani is pro-choice and yet the conservative governor Rick Perry wanted to “appoint” Rudy to the most powerful office in the world in 2008.

I realize critics claim Romney is not conservative because he did not have a Republican litmus test in his selection of judicial nominees. However, almost all of Romney’s appointments, 30 out of 36, were to lower court positions where judges deal directly with criminals at the district and magistrate levels. Rather than political affiliation, Romney looked for effective prosecutorial experience and a record of being tough on crime. As Romney explained when asked about it, “people on both sides of the aisle want to put the bad guys away.” Rick Perry himself illustrates that fact, as he used to be a Democrat but has always been strong on crime and the death penalty.

Romney explained that even though he had only a few chances to appoint judges to higher courts, and no chances to appoint anyone to the MA Supreme Judicial Court, in those cases the criteria changes to include “strict construction, judicial philosophy,” which he adhered to as criteria in those appointments. In all, only 12.5% of registered voters in Massachusetts are Republican and Romney’s 9 Republican nominees count for 25% of his total judicial appointments, representing Republicans twice as well as they are represented in the general voting public. But more important than political affiliation, Romney’s appointments represent the relevant conservative qualifications.

whyromney.com/prolife_conversion.php
Romney forces Catholic Hospitals to provide abortion pills
boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/12/09/romney_says_no_hospitals_are_exempt_from_pill_law/
Click to expand...
No Catholic should support this guy.
He will lose to Obama… I’m starting to suspect that is exactly what some of his supporters want.
Click to expand...
No, the Massachusetts legislature did. Romney objected and tried to find a way out of the situation but in the end was forced to comply with the law in a manner similar to the way every governor has had to enable abortion in their states, including conservatives like Mike Huckabee and Rick Perry.

Romney in fact vetoed the legislation in question and the legislature overrode Romney’s veto, after which Romney tried to make an exemption for private hospitals by citing a conscience clause in state law. There was one clear obstacle to Romney’s preferred exemption: the legislature has authority to supersede previous laws with new laws, and the clear intent of the legislature was for this bill to supersede any contradictory statutes or provisions rather than to work in harmony with the older statute. Thus, if Romney were to challenge the intended effect of the law, he would have had to argue disingenuously in court that the older provision and the new provision could be reconciled when that was likely not true. It is perhaps not surprising that Romney felt bound by the new law and it was in this context that Romney told the Department of Public Health they had to enforce the intent of the law even though he disagreed with it.

whyromney.com/prolife_conversion.php
 
Thank you for this post.
_Abyssinia said:
…

…Whether they realize it or not, a vote for Barack Obama at the ballot box means they have constituted remote material cooperation or material cooperation with evil, depending on the voter’s reasons for voting.

Simply, you have properly catechized Catholics - they won’t vote for pro abortion, religious liberty impinging candidates. …
Click to expand...
 
dcingoranelli said:
It is surprising to me, given what Obama and his administration have been up to, that nearly a third of respondents cast their straw vote for him in this poll.
Click to expand...
I too cannot understand how any practicing Catholic could vote for Obama.
 
christian7777 said:
Oh, so the idiots like Obama. 😃
Click to expand...
Code: 
  Even intelligent people can be misinformed, or choose to wear blinders. What I cannot fathom is how some folks could sit in pews every week, KNOW that Obama supports infanticide, and still rationalize a vote for him. If my pastor supported Obama, I'd never enter that church again. Obama despises us Christians, you know, those who foolishly cling to our God and guns. Only the slimiest of creeps could be so condescending toward good, solid Americans. :ouch: Rob

 "If they bring a knife to a fight, we'll bring a gun." Barack Hussein Obama
 
Oh, so the idiots like Obama.
Click to expand...
Please remember that the person you called an idiot…your word…is the President of the United States.

I challenged you to do so well,

John
 
oldcelt said:
Please remember that the person you called an idiot…your word…is the President of the United States.

I challenged you to do so well,

John
Click to expand...
I agree. I disagree with the President politically, but he is not an idiot. Even if I doubted his mental capacity, it would be uncharitable to post it in such a way.
 
agree. I disagree with the President politically, but he is not an idiot. Even if I doubted his mental capacity, it would be uncharitable to post it in such a way.
Click to expand...
Huzzah, Robert,

John
 
christian7777 said:
Oh, so the idiots like Obama. 😃
Click to expand...
oldcelt said:
Please remember that the person you called an idiot…your word…is the President of the United States.
Click to expand...
rlg94086 said:
I agree. I disagree with the President politically, but he is not an idiot.
Click to expand...
Perhaps we need a grammar lesson on sentence diagraming. The poster did not call the President and idiot. “Like” is the verb and “Obama” is the object of the verb, not that it is any more charitable to call fellow Catholics idiots because the are fans of the president.
 
oldcelt said:
Please remember that the person you called an idiot…your word…is the President of the United States.

I challenged you to do so well,

John
Click to expand...
It's unsettling to dislike the person who occupies the Oval Office so intensely. I always thought that Americans should respect the President, but I don't. I think that he is holds Americans who believe in individual sovereignty in contempt, and that he is, to a great extent, an enemy within. It's terrible to think that way, but he confirms my suspicions about him with every position he takes. He is shredding our Constitution, so why should I hold him in high regard just b/c of the office he holds? :shrug: Rob
 
pnewton said:
Perhaps we need a grammar lesson on sentence diagraming. The poster did not call the President and idiot. “Like” is the verb and “Obama” is the object of the verb, not that it is any more charitable to call fellow Catholics idiots because the are fans of the president.
Click to expand...
Valid point. The poster could have been referring to Obama, but they may have meant it the way you are saying. “Like Obama” can mean Obama, in that sentence, is an example of the sort of idiot being referred to.
 
rlg94086 said:
Valid point. The poster could have been referring to Obama, but they may have meant it the way you are saying. “Like Obama” can mean Obama, in that sentence, is an example of the sort of idiot being referred to.
Click to expand...
I should think that in this Facebook age, the use of ‘like’ as a verb would come first to mind 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top