Our Next President

  • Thread starter Thread starter BListon
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
GEddie said:
I should think that in this Facebook age, the use of ‘like’ as a verb would come first to mind 🙂
Click to expand...
Actually, in this Facebook age, “like” is, like, not used as a verb. I am constantly, like, explaining to my kids, like, that they use like, like, too much, like, you know?
 
rlg94086 said:
Actually, in this Facebook age, “like” is, like, not used as a verb. I am constantly, like, explaining to my kids, like, that they use like, like, too much, like, you know?
Click to expand...
LOL!!

Do kids still talk that way???

ICXC NIKA
 
oldcelt said:
Please remember that the person you called an idiot…your word…is the President of the United States.

I challenged you to do so well,

John
Click to expand...
Please refer to the post that I replied to:
GEddie said:
The “social justice/environment/etc trumps everything” crowd will have no trouble thinking so.

ICXC NIKA
Click to expand...
I was calling these sorts of people idiots, not Obama. I was saying that idiots like Obama, not “idiots such as Obama”. In fact, as horrible of a president he is, I must admit that Obama is a very intelligent person.
 
christian7777 said:
Please refer to the post that I replied to:
Originally Posted by GEddie View Post
The “social justice/environment/etc trumps everything” crowd will have no trouble thinking so.
Click to expand...
Hmmm, there are quite a few one-issue-trumps-all people in these forums…

And how exactly are people who are interested in social justice and the environment “idiots”? You slam a lot of good people when you say that
Click to expand...
 
MODERATOR WARNING

Please discuss the issues, not each other. I will start suspending and banning members who insist on attacking or making comments about other members.

Your best option is to discuss the issues charitably and not mention nor infer anything about anyone else or how anyone else posts.
 
Jerry_Miah said:
Hmmm, there are quite a few one-issue-trumps-all people in these forums…

And how exactly are people who are interested in social justice and the environment “idiots”? You slam a lot of good people when you say that
Click to expand...
I consider most liberal views to be asinine. I don’t think all liberals are stupid, though. I’m not a one-issue-trumps-all person; I dislike Obama for his views on multiple issues: abortion, gay rights, foreign policy, taxes, military spending, government spending, etc. In fact, I’m not even conservative on every issue; I’m against the death penalty and I support Fair Trade.

I don’t really want to discuss how I think that liberals obsessed with social justice and the environment are idiots, though, because I don’t want to start an argument. All I’ll say about that is that I don’t support gay marriage nor civil unions, and I believe that, for the most part, both the human involvement and the potential negative effects of anthropomorphic global warming are exaggerated.
 
Barak Obama is to the White House Ovil Office what Mohamma Atta was to cockpit of the Boeing 747 on 9-11. Think about it…!
 
gilliam said:
I’m willing to bet real money the GOP nominee is Romney
Click to expand...
I’ve done more than that. I bet real money ($100) that Romney will be our next president. I don’t normally bet, but I’m a sucker for overconfident odds. My boss bet me 10 to 1. He bet a few other friends with the same odds, and his wife threatened to leave him if he loses. 😛

I think Romney has a good chance, but it is not going to be a cakewalk on either side IMO.
 
I’ve seen some people here claim the “inevitability” of Romney’s nomination and some delegates totals being thrown around. I’d like to give people the facts regarding the delegates, which the mainstream media is practically completely ignoring - they’re too busy talking about Romney’s VP ideas.

Louisiana: marketwatch.com/story/ron-paul-wins-louisiana-caucus-2012-04-29

Iowa and Minnesota: policymic.com/articles/7394/ron-paul-won-iowa-and-minnesota-in-fact-video&referral=latest_comments

Alaska: politico.com/blogs/charlie-mahtesian/2012/04/ron-pauls-alaska-payback-121953.html

Washington: infowars.com/ron-paul-2012-wins-majority-of-washington-delegates-to-convention-other-states-expected-to-follow/

Even in Massachusetts: policymic.com/articles/7650/ron-paul-wins-massachusetts-delegates-in-district-caucuses&referral=latest_comments

These are just some of the REAL delegates that have been selected. Check out the real results in Maine, Nevada, and Colorado as well.

The projected delegate totals that you see on major news sources are just that: projections. In other words, wrong. Romney has a large number of delegates, but not as many as they’re telling you. Funny, there are many Santorum people teaming with Paul to prevent Romeny from winning now:

policymic.com/articles/7019/ron-paul-winning-delegates-with-santorum-support-coalition

On a final note, I find it humorous that the only non-Romney candidate left in the race (and picking up loads of delegates in the process) was the only one not included in this poll. Somewhat odd. I’m not surprised, however, that the “other” vote (Paul, basically) is so high.

There you have it folks, some real delegate results, not Romney’s VP pick, when he hasn’t even won yet.
 
rlg94086 said:
…except on the polls that count - actual election results for the Republican Primary. He isn’t doing so well at those polls…
Click to expand...
So heads up against Obama he does well, but the GOP will never give him that chance. Instead we’re stuck with Mr. Excitement. Super. Someone wake me up when its 2016.
 
Scott_Lafrance said:
So heads up against Obama he does well, but the GOP will never give him that chance. Instead we’re stuck with Mr. Excitement. Super. Someone wake me up when its 2016.
Click to expand...
It is what it is…set your alarm. 😛

As a third party candidate against Obama and Romney, how does he do?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top