R
Regular_Atheist
Guest
First of all it is important to understand that Marxism is a social critique. Communism is not the blueprint for a new society, it is only the negation of the current one, the abolition of all that currently exists. I can’t give you the minute details of a new society. I can only infer how communism will be based on how our current society is, in that communism will be what capitalism isn’t.Giving away food for free isn’t difficult, but how would the farm ensure that “the maintenance of the farm would be provided to the farm from elsewhere without having to be paid for or any act of exchange taking place”?
Under communism all members of society could finally engage in a rational plan of production. This doesn’t mean there would be a planned economy in the Stalinist sense, only that people would literally be able to consciously plan how things are produced, rather than it being dictated by abstract economic laws as it currently is. Society would be able to plan what the farm needs in terms of resources to keep it productive. Perhaps those involved in the production of food and maintenance of the farm could keep an account of what they need and remain in contact with those who could distribute the goods for them. Those goods would then be provided for free.
I didn’t say it’s impossible to break with capitalism while it exists. I said capitalism can only be broken with collectively, when members of the proletariat revolt against their inhuman consciousness under capitalism and stop the reproduction of the capital-labour relation.If capitalism cannot be resisted until after capitalism ceases to exist, then why do you think that you have the power to resist capitalism? It exists. Therefore, you cannot resist it. It determines your consciousness. Therefore, you are merely spouting capitalist propaganda.
I did not mean they were isolated in the normal sense. They would be isolated in terms of their social production - they would produce on their own private plots of land and would have no direct association with each other. They would own their own land and their own produce. As a result, they would have no choice but to exchange their own produce for the produce of others. It is from this set-up that commodity production arises, the existence of individual producers or groups of producers producing in isolation from one another.I didn’t say that they would be isolated from one another. How did you reach a conclusion about isolation?
Well obviously I will be limited by the physical possibility of doing something and my own personal abilities. I cannot fly a plane and I cannot travel around the world with bananas on my own. However, if society needed bananas to be delivered to a certain place that could be organized.How? Suppose you happen to have the strange desire to gather bananas from Iceland and fly them back to the tropical countries where they are grown. If that’s what you want to do, then who is going to help you, and what makes you think that “it needs doing”?