Paganism

  • Thread starter Thread starter brotherhrolf
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a post I made in another thread about the “tremendous amount of data that indicates otherwise.” It approaches it from a different angle.

I think also the way that the Old Testament and ancient Jewish culture flows so perfectly into the New Testament and modern Catholicism (and some Protestantism) is a great testament to the truth.

It’s just amazing that people believed these things thousands of years ago which really don’t make much sense, and yet when we get the full we realize that they not only made sense, but perfect and profound sense. It’s inconceivable to me that men could have created such a perfect falsehood of a the way things are with so many thousands of amazing and profound nuances that are so subtle they are still being discovered today yet are so profound that they answer nearly perfectly the question of who we are and why we’re here. Many of history’s greatest thinkers, like the great philosophers, spent thousands of years trying to figure out truth, and build up from the ground a systematic description of it. No matter how hard they tried, the GREATEST minds we’ve ever had still devised ideas full of flaws and holes, ideas that contradicted themselves as well as other ideas.

Then comes along Catholicism with such a an amazing and astonishing harmony, a beautiful and perfect harmony, both with itself and with Judaism, which was its seed, a harmony filled with nuance and subtlety that is just as astounding and meaningful as the huge aspects of it.

Especially if there is some other truth somewhere, or some other god, for men to be able to falsify truth so well given the existence of real truth and a real god would be even more inconceivable, even impossible, especially since most other religions also teach to some extent about the inferiority of man compared to god. Something so inferior could not produce something so superior, some falsehood that holds up to the staunchest objections even when the truth cannot.

That’s my take.
 
40.png
Lazerlike42:
I don’t think Luke was mistaken about the census, it is more Matthew trying to come up with another messianic prophecy fulfulled. he had to invent the baby slaughter to have a reason for the flight to Egypt. 6AD (census) neatly fits to a conjunction of Mars, Jupiter and Saturn, recorded as the Bethlehem star.

As for our four-legged friends, when I read that passage in context, it is clear it means insects.
 
40.png
brotherhrolf:
Are you saying that we humans have the capability to bring “gods” into the world simply by belief?
If so, what does that imply for all of humanity?
I want to clear one thing up. I am not saying that all of these things are true. We are discussing paganism and various belief systems in paganism. We are not discussing my personal faith.

We are two scholars discussing ideas. It is not my place or purpose to convince you that what someone else believes is true or real. I am merely offering what I know about their beliefs.

There are many religions that DO believe that without the energy provided by human belief and worship, their deities would disappear.

There are people who believe they can conjour up spirits and create things called elementals, by gathering energy together.

In your study of anthropology, have you studied beliefs on prayer and magic? There is a spectrum of beliefs concerning how human intent, effort interacts with the mystical. On one end is a mystical or divine which does not interact at all, then it moves on to a more cooperative approach, humans and gods working together, then we get toward the end where the gods are in some ways dependant on humans to get things done, and then to the point where humans create gods with their beliefs, and then to humans=gods.

These are the ways people throughout history have explained their experience with the mystical.

What Christians call prayer and what some call magic are very closely related, and in some traditions identical. Many people believe that if we focus our intent we can work with the divine create a desired reality. When people feel a strong need or desire, they ask others to join them, feeling this will strengthen the “work” being done. It is not that far from the idea, that if enough people believe it, it becomes reality.

Many philosophies include the concept that the universe is a projection of our minds, that there is no absolute reality etc. For these philosophies, it is not only possible for people to create their own gods, and have the gods respond according to belief, but it is the only way that gods come to be.

Again, I am not arguing that people can really do any of these things. But the reality is that there are people who believe and practice these things.

They do it, they are convinced of the reality of it, and are experiencing something related to the practice of it.

In my experience Christians usually decide those people are consorting with demons.

In my own studies of religions and beliefs, I have come across many bizarre and unexplainable things. There is no monopoly anywhere on miracles, wonders etc.

The explanation? Perhaps the divine interacts with different people in a way they can understand, speaks to each in their own language so to speak. Perhaps there are numerous deities and each group is dealing with reality. Perhaps all of it is a figment of rich human imagination. I really don’t know. But clearly there is something big, and of great importance going on that bears looking at.

cheddar
 
The Eurasian:
Atheists enjoy talking with you about things you cannot see or check. Why don’t you all corral them into miracles that they can see with their own 2 eyes, like this Miracle of Lanciano???

What’s causing bread to turn into Human Flesh, INTO HUMAN VEINS, INTO HUMAN ARTERIES??? What/WHO is preventing This Human Heart Muscle, Veins, Arteries, Blood from decomposing???
We are not discussin atheism here. We are discussing religions. The belief systems we are discussing do believe in and experience miracles. Many have seen them with their own eyes.

cheddar
 
40.png
marvin:
Such as…?
If you are interested in studying the faiths, miracles and basis of faith for other religions, that is well and good, but I am not going to do your research for you.

It would be best, and probably more fufilling for you to find the information for yourself, or contact members of those faiths for their assistance.

I am not in a positions to defend or present detailed information about the specific faiths of others.

cheddar
 
40.png
cheddarsox:
If you are interested in studying the faiths, miracles and basis of faith for other religions, that is well and good, but I am not going to do your research for you.

It would be best, and probably more fufilling for you to find the information for yourself, or contact members of those faiths for their assistance.

I am not in a positions to defend or present detailed information about the specific faiths of others.

cheddar
I didn’t ask you to do reasearch for me. I have experimented with new age philosophy, buddism, hinduism,etc. I have found all of it lacking, to say the least.

I see that in your personal profile, you identify your religion as “pantheist” and that you are interested in “ritual”. This bit of information combined with previous posts in this thread leads me to believe that you are attempting to defend something; new age ideas, “pantheism” , whatever.
 
40.png
marvin:
I didn’t ask you to do reasearch for me. I have experimented with new age philosophy, buddism, hinduism,etc. I have found all of it lacking, to say the least.

I see that in your personal profile, you identify your religion as “pantheist” and that you are interested in “ritual”. This bit of information combined with previous posts in this thread leads me to believe that you are attempting to defend something; new age ideas, “pantheism” , whatever.
I was attempting to offer some thoughts reguarding the OP’s question. And, if necessary, refute any untruths that other’s post out of ignorance or malice.

I don’t care if people agree with other religions, or support them or whatever, but I don’t like when they post things that aren’t true about them.

Sometimes I have to call the pagans on nonsense they state concerning christians on their forums.

Telling lies about someone else doesn’t prove a person truthful.

cheddar
 
Sometimes I have to call the pagans on nonsense they state concerning christians on their forums.
Good for you. Why don’t you get off the fence and come back home?
 
40.png
cheddarsox:
I want to clear one thing up. I am not saying that all of these things are true. We are discussing paganism and various belief systems in paganism. We are not discussing my personal faith.

We are two scholars discussing ideas. It is not my place or purpose to convince you that what someone else believes is true or real. I am merely offering what I know about their beliefs.
I agree. Your personal faith is your personal faith. In an effort to not “trash” other people’s faith, I tried to limit this discussion to that which I thought all of us could agree on. So, let me rephrase the question. Does belief in mitichlorians (sp) bring mitichlorians into existence? And if you don’t think mitichlorians (sp) are a construct then there is no sense in carrying on this discussion.
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Like the Earth is really a flat rectangle with a canopy of water above it?
Or like Herodes has not been dead for 10 years when Quirinius started the census?
Or like insects have four legs?
Sarcasm and an iconoclastic response does not help your case. You are not thinking carefully or with any depth in this post. You have made an assumption concerning human of invention of Judaism and Christianity and you have failed to address the fact that you are:
  1. making an assumption and
  2. that you not considering or addressing the multitude of data
    to the contrary.
 
A book that explains how neopagans can believe in a pure construct being/becoming a “god” is Stalking the Wild Pendulum by Itzhak Bentof.
One of the major ideas in the book is that if enough people spend enough time & energy believeing that, say, a rock, is a deity, that it will gather enough energy to become divine.
Now, at this point in my life, I think that sounds ridiculous, but when I first read it, it made a big impression…I was younger, spiritually at sea, and both physically & emotionally near the breaking point. Under those circumstances, it seemed to make a kind of weird sense.
I would like to caution people: Do not read this book if you are similarly adrift in your faith,* please*! I don’t want anyone to have to suffer the kind of confusion that I did!
But for a good look into the mindset of a new-age believer in Woden, the “force”, or whatever, it is a dandy book. (I found it on Amazon…)
 
40.png
brotherhrolf:
I agree. Your personal faith is your personal faith. In an effort to not “trash” other people’s faith, I tried to limit this discussion to that which I thought all of us could agree on. So, let me rephrase the question. Does belief in mitichlorians (sp) bring mitichlorians into existence? And if you don’t think mitichlorians (sp) are a construct then there is no sense in carrying on this discussion.
I do not believe that a belief in mitochlorians brings them into existence.

But there are philosophies and beliefs that do support that belief in a thing makes it real.

And I have witnesses that if enough people believe a thing is true, and all act together as if a thing is true, they can often manifest occurances that make it appear as if the thing is true.
I think that often this “group mentality” is the power behind some belief systems, because the “appearance” of reality caused by group experience fuels greater belief etc.

cheddar
 
40.png
Pax:
You have made an assumption concerning human of invention of Judaism and Christianity and you have failed to address the fact that you are:
  1. making an assumption and
  2. that you not considering or addressing the multitude of data
    to the contrary.
Ok,
  1. How do you regard other religions like Wiccan? Do you think they are man-made? If so, please show that is not only an “assumption”.
  2. There is no such data.
Between Christians an Neo-pagans is no difference.You believe in some god, they believe in some god. You pray, they pray. You have symbols, they have symbols. You worship, they worship. Your god image is based on an older one, their gods are based on older one. You came up with new rites, they come up with new rites.
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Ok,
  1. How do you regard other religions like Wiccan? Do you think they are man-made?
Actually, they might be, and it is very likely from your father, the devil.
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Ok,
  1. How do you regard other religions like Wiccan? Do you think they are man-made?
In alleged apparitions of the Virgin Mary and alleged apparitions of Jesus Christ, THERE ARE APPARITIONS WHICH THE CATHOLIC CHURCH REJECTED. Yet they had processes which were clearly NON-NATURAL. Since they believe that they come from the devil, they are not called supernatural but PRETERNATURAL.

For example, in one of these false or unapproved apparitions, hails were falling onto the eyeballs of the seers whose heads were all turned upwards to the sky. In the laws of science, their eyeballs would burst. But look, nothing happened to their eyes at all.

In another false apparition, a visionary said to Jesus Christ, “But my Lord, where are your wounds???” That’s right, the devil was appearing to him, AND PRETENDING TO BE JESUS CHRIST. Yet, these are cases where the devil appears to Catholics, especially very holy Catholics.

Padre Pio was physically fighting the devil. One time the devil uprooted the metal post of his bed which was buried on the concrete floor.

SO DON’T BE SURPRISED. IF SOME OF THESE RELIGIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS OF THE DEVIL HIMSELF.
 
40.png
AnAtheist:
Ok,
  1. How do you regard other religions like Wiccan? Do you think they are man-made? If so, please show that is not only an “assumption”.
  2. There is no such data.
Between Christians an Neo-pagans is no difference.You believe in some god, they believe in some god. You pray, they pray. You have symbols, they have symbols. You worship, they worship. Your god image is based on an older one, their gods are based on older one. You came up with new rites, they come up with new rites.
Please try answering the questions and points made to you. Trying to ask the same question of me is not an answer. Furthermore, your response to number two is merely a denial that there is any data. This is a blanket statement without foundation. You merely dismiss it by denying its existence. This is perhaps intellectually expedient for you, but it lends nothing to the support of your position.

Your statement that there is no difference between Christians and Neo-pagans other than the age of the beliefs themselves is erroneous and an obvious over simplification. The only way you can make such a statement is to ignore the data which you claim does not exist.

I realize that posts take time, and that carefully developed arguments with all of the supporting data cannot be crammed into them with any degree of ease. I do not expect you to present a lengthy argument with many details, but I hope that you will examine your position anew. I have pointed to the deficiencies in your statements only for the purpose of showing you that there are problems in the logic as presented. You may well have tighter and more cogent remarks that support your points but they have not been made here.

I am going to suggest a couple of books that you would find remarkably challenging to your position. The author is a Doctor of philosophy named Peter Kreeft. He wrote Christianity for Modern Pagans and The Handbook of Christian Apologetics.. One of the interesting things about Kreeft’s work is that he examines all of the arguments for and against belief in God, and he shows that every argument that has ever been mounted against the existence of God is logically flawed and can be refuted. In contrast, the arguments in favor of the existence of God may not individually provide absolute proof of the existence God, but when bound together they are highly persuasive. While not providing absolute proof, some of the arguments for the existence of God have no logical flaws and cannot be refuted. This is an important consideration when weighing the two positions.

Beyond this Kreeft also examines Christianity and other religions. The case for Christianity is not the same as it is for other faiths, and you will easily see that your contention, that they are all simply myths and equal in there emptiness, is an unfounded conclusion. If you are willing to challenge your own thinking you will find Kreeft’s work to be an important step in exploring the truth that awaits you.
 
40.png
Pax:
Please try answering the questions and points made to you. Trying to ask the same question of me is not an answer.
No, but it helps you to see the obvious answer, when you ask yourself the same question.
Furthermore, your response to number two is merely a denial that there is any data. This is a blanket statement without foundation. You merely dismiss it by denying its existence. This is perhaps intellectually expedient for you, but it lends nothing to the support of your position.
Hm, I have seen enough “data” to tell its either fiction, fraud, a hoax, dilusions, or wishful thinking. You think otherwise, then dig out some waterproof data.
The author is a Doctor of philosophy named Peter Kreeft./QUOTE]
I have seen his arguments for Christianity. Each one has serious flaws, which I already showed on this very board. None is really convincing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top