Pagans, especially Wiccans....

  • Thread starter Thread starter SamG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
Pentecost2005:
What do you want to apologize to them for? That you’re sorry they’re so… lost? confused? ill-informed? misguided? :confused:

Unless you’re personally responsible for that TV show “Charmed,” in which case you can apologize to ME. 😃
Just a hunch, but I think SamG meant*** “apologize”*** in the sense of making a formal defense or justification for the faith, as opposed to making a regretful acknowledgment of a fault or offense. 😉

Cute play on words, though. 😛
 
I Leatherman:
How old is it?
Can you explain how paganism passed on its original beliefs to your generation from antiquity?
Paganism was never a written religion, there are no original ancient pagan manuscripts, and since Christianitys conversion of the pagans, their original exact beliefs have died out nearly 2000 years ago.
How can you pick up the original lost thread of paganism.
It is more likely neo-paganism is of your own creation, and is about as useful as positive-thinking (whatever that is).
Wiccan has only existed since 1948. It was founded by Robert? Gardener. Anyhow, wiccans basically only have to follow the wiccan rede, “an’ it harm none, do what ye will.” Sounds good, but it is so easy to lie and say something does no harm or to say it is okay to do a small amount of harm for the greater good. It’s a very self-centered religion that is about building personal power, which is very satanistic. Wiccans are hard to apologize to because they have so much flexibility with what they believe. You basically have to find out exactly what your friend believes and break it down piece by piece. There is a pretty good apologetics booklet by Fr. Frank Chacon & Jim Burnham called Beginning Apologetics 4: How to answer Atheists and New Agers. While not comprehensive by any means, it will give you a start. One thing that is totally easy to tear down right off the bat, however, is reincarnation. If we really have past lives because we are working through many to perfection, how come we can’t remember our past lives? It seems like we can’t learn from our past mistakes if we don’t remember them. I guess some people will answer back that past life regression therapy is necessary to complete this spiritual journey, but that’s lame. Jesus trained His apostles and sent them out to teach the world the Truth as a loving God would. Why would past life regression be so hard to come by if it were the true path designed by the Creator(s)? Doesn’t seem very loving to keep information limited to a few “in the know” types and doom everyone else to endless repetitive life cycles repeating past mistakes. Take heart, though. I used to be a wiccan, and it was fairly easy for me to convert to Catholicism because of all of our rituals and fun things like incense and bells and holy water. I’ll pray for your friend to understand that just because a group won’t tell you you’re wrong doesn’t mean they’re good for you. Guten luck!
 
40.png
dafalax:
Wiccan has only existed since 1948. It was founded by Robert? Gardener.
Athough Gardner is credited for “founding” modern Wicca, I think something should also be said about Aleister “The Beast” Crowley, who influenced significantly much of the neo-pagan movement, especially Wicca and modern Satanism.
Wiccans are hard to apologize to because they have so much flexibility with what they believe.
Very true, especially for solitary practitioners.
One thing that is totally easy to tear down right off the bat, however, is reincarnation.
Not really, though it might be easy for us Christians and the other monotheistic religions like Islam and Judaism. From the perspective of karma though, reincarnation actually makes sense (I’m not saying I believe it, but if you would understand the concept of karma and reincarnation, it would fit in).
If we really have past lives because we are working through many to perfection, how come we can’t remember our past lives?
Those who studied reincarnation can easily answer this: sort of like having our present consciousness not being able to completely regress to the point of going back to one’s past life; this also serves as a sort of buffer to help the person focus on the reality he is living now, and not get confused with his past reality.
 
I run into this alot. I love fantasy literature, and I like to look for the moral issues in them, since they are most of the time focused on good verus evil issues, and can be pretty interesting as allegories. However, in the course of these discussions, I invariable run into neo-pagans, wiccans, etc.

Whenever I defend the Church or try to set the record straight when they seem to like to revise history, I am immediately told that I am being close minded. One of the things that drive me crazy is when I run into someone that tries to tell me that they are more kind and forgiving than I am, becuase they beleive that my religeon is a possible path, but I refuse to tell them that their path is “equally valid.”

Logic never seems to seep through to them. I try to explain to them that they cannot find my religeon valid, because my faith has NO ROOM for gods that are not the God of Christianity. There cannot be a way for polytheism and monotheism to coexist, becuase they are mutually exclusive. But when I get frustrated with them, I have to stop and think that they have not arrived at their faith through logic, but through raw emotion. I would like to think that my faith makes sense both logically and emotionally.

I guess I am very frustrated by the fact that often I don’t even bring up being Catholic until someone takes a shot at the faith, then when I defend it, these neo-pagans fall into victim mode, essentially saying that if I defend my faith that I am victimizing them somehow.

The funny thing is, I have to constantly pray for patience with matters such as these. I can have a great deal of respect for people raised Hindu or Budhist, for example, dispite the fact that I wish they knew the fullness of the sacrifice made for them. But none of these neo-pagans that I run into have been raised as neo-pagans, they just fall into it because its different, non judgemental, and in fact, can be anything they want it to be. Its frustrating because its really just a bunch of ancient dead religeons cut and pased together.

So I guess I will just keep praying for patience and praying that I say the right things to them so that I can be a good example of my faith.
 
okay story of wicca, from one…for the one who said we hate the catholics is very very much wrong,most of us are afraid of them ever sense the start of the witch-hunts (aka: the burning times) where saint augustinian said “all pagans,jews,and heretics will burn into the lake of fire with the devil” and that caused this to happen and everything else, now we still live in some fear of bieng tied up and burned or hanged…but we are a realgion (sry if i misspelled that, kinda half asleep)…and we are not “new” we are jst a rebirth of the old ways of the craft. we live in harmony and peace, many claim to be wiccans and cast spells and hexes, which gives us a bad name for we harm none as it is part of our rede which is our guidlines of the craft for all we do comes back to us

theres a brief history lesson for the day
 
many claim to be wiccans and cast spells and hexes, which gives us a bad name for we harm none as it is part of our rede which is our guidlines of the craft for all we do comes back to us

theres a brief history lesson for the day
A couple of questions. First, by what standard do you define what harm is? Second, who, or what dispenses the justice for causing (or wishing) harm to someone else through magic?

Pax Tecum,
Jay
 
okay…now by harm i think everyone has a common way of defining it, harm for us is also tampering with free will in any shape or form,which includes scare tactics which i’ve gone through with the many bible thumpers in my town, and for the second question…nothing gives justice to harm no matter the causes but we as humans are not perfect.
 
A couple of questions. First, by what standard do you define what harm is? Second, who, or what dispenses the justice for causing (or wishing) harm to someone else through magic?

Pax Tecum,
Jay
Harm is anything that:
A) Hurts others or ourselves physically or mentally or spiritually
or
B) Tampers with free will, Or done specifically for personal gain
ANYONE who dares say they are Wiccan, but threatens to curse or hex you is not a Wiccan, but a dark practitioner.
My signature is the full wiccan rede.
Cya, Your Wiccan (and Oh so proud of it) friend
Wammy
 
Harm is anything that:
A) Hurts others or ourselves physically or mentally or spiritually or
B) Tampers with free will, Or done specifically for personal gain
ANYONE who dares say they are Wiccan, but threatens to curse or hex you is not a Wiccan, but a dark practitioner.
My signature is the full wiccan rede.
So not that I know many wiccans, but if this is all true, why are so many pro-abortion and contraception? If these things are not seen as harming others then I think there is a problem because it denies another their very rightful existance for our personal gain. Also, to manipulate a situation to one’s own advantage is outright selfish and with selfishness always comes harm to another. So I’m not sure if the definition of harm is so common. I’m not justifying the hellfire and brimstone bible thumpers either. This is just to state that we probably should take a good look at what we say and believe.
 
What do you want to apologize to them for? That you’re sorry they’re so… lost? confused? ill-informed? misguided? :confused:

Unless you’re personally responsible for that TV show “Charmed,” in which case you can apologize to ME. 😃
Enjoyed the show Charmed…never missed an episode. The premise of the show was not about promoting evil, but defeating it. But then again, it was fiction…I would have like to have seen it continued…
 
Enjoyed the show Charmed…never missed an episode. The premise of the show was not about promoting evil, but defeating it. But then again, it was fiction…I would have like to have seen it continued…
so you could make fun of it, right? The writing and acting on that show were so bad.
 
So not that I know many wiccans, but if this is all true, why are so many pro-abortion and contraception? If these things are not seen as harming others then I think there is a problem because it denies another their very rightful existance for our personal gain. Also, to manipulate a situation to one’s own advantage is outright selfish and with selfishness always comes harm to another. So I’m not sure if the definition of harm is so common. I’m not justifying the hellfire and brimstone bible thumpers either. This is just to state that we probably should take a good look at what we say and believe.
well like i said in my last thing were not all perfect and even some christans agree on some cases that abortion would be okay (i.e. if i woman was raped), and with the manipulation we try our best not to, but simple mistakes happen. and im male so the contraception issue i think should be left up to someone else
 
Hello.

Not all wiccans believe or follow the wiccan rede, and the same can be said for witches, druids, and other pagans. It varies from person to person, group to group, tribe to tribe.

I, for example, do not follow the rede or any ‘law’ except for the laws of my country…for the most part. 👍

Paganism includes many, many religions from around the world. Wicca composes a small part of paganism in general.

Just wanted to pop in and clarify that.
 
So not that I know many wiccans, but if this is all true, why are so many pro-abortion and contraception?
Granted, some Wiccans (including myself) aren’t opposed to abortion or contraception, but that doesn’t mean all of us are. like all religions, there is a division on that particular matter. Some Catholics, whom I’m very close to are not opposed to abortion or contraception, and say what you will, they are still Catholic.
Cya, your Wiccan friend
Wammy
 
What do you want to apologize to them for? That you’re sorry they’re so… lost? confused? ill-informed? misguided? :confused:

Unless you’re personally responsible for that TV show “Charmed,” in which case you can apologize to ME. 😃
I have not scanned all of the post yet, however I think SamG ment by “apologize” was offer Catholic-Christian apologetics–defense of Catholic claims—to Wiccans
 
okay story of wicca, from one…for the one who said we hate the catholics is very very much wrong,most of us are afraid of them ever sense the start of the witch-hunts (aka: the burning times) where saint augustinian said “all pagans,jews,and heretics will burn into the lake of fire with the devil” and that caused this to happen and everything else, now we still live in some fear of bieng tied up and burned or hanged…but we are a realgion (sry if i misspelled that, kinda half asleep)…and we are not “new” we are jst a rebirth of the old ways of the craft. we live in harmony and peace, many claim to be wiccans and cast spells and hexes, which gives us a bad name for we harm none as it is part of our rede which is our guidlines of the craft for all we do comes back to us

theres a brief history lesson for the day
First, an in-context citation of St. Augustine would be nice.

Secondly, the treating of “witchcraft” as a capital offense actually has it’s origin in PAGAN Rome–and the penalty for Sorcery LAPSED under Christiqn rule until AFTER 1300–when things like the 100 Years War and the Black Death produced a sociological atmosphere of fear.

Third: Wicca IS a new religion–calling yourself the “old Religion” is a prime example of “special pleading”. See wiccan & anthropologiust Ronald Hutton if you dont believe me.

Secondly, “Burning Times”–just how many “witches” do YOU think were executed during theis “period”?
 
So not that I know many wiccans, but if this is all true, why are so many pro-abortion and contraception? If these things are not seen as harming others then I think there is a problem
I support contraception precisely BECAUSE I disapprove of elective abortion. Failure to differentiate between the putative “evil” of contraception and the very real harms that stem from freely elective abortion is, IMO, the larger problem. (full disclosure - I am Pagan but not Wiccan, and do not follow the Rede.)
 
Failure to differentiate between the putative “evil” of contraception and the very real harms that stem from freely elective abortion is, IMO, the larger problem. (full disclosure - I am Pagan but not Wiccan, and do not follow the Rede.)
As far as what I personally had written in the quoted post, there is no difference. Both deny existance.
However, I understand that more often than not it’s just said that contraception is wrong and that’s as far as it goes. (Well, sometimes “the Bible says so” or “the Church says so” may be added and as these are all well and good, to those that hold no allegiance to these, they are irrelevant.) But the abortion side explanations that it’s murder and often gives examples of how. Contraception is more of a so called “grey” area to most because, unlike abortion where there is a physical presence within the womb, the results are not as obvious. It’s more justifiable in thinking there is no harm because it’s not allowing the reproductive process to begin, therefore not having a child present to inflict harm on (speaking of those acts that do not allow the sperm and egg to unite and not including the “pill”, which is at times an abortifaciant). But that’s the very reason it is harmful. Just think if our parents did not allow the process to begin when we were concieved. This conversation wouldn’t be happening because we wouldn’t exist. It goes against fairness and balance, and seeks self satisfaction at the cost of what is to happen at that particular crossing of time and substance.

So anyway, that’s probably way more than you wanted to read and I’m being disrespectful to the OP in changing the subject. Not to mention there are threads specifically addressed to this topic.

I have to say, though, that I respect that you are willing to take the time to be part of a forum run by Catholics. Maybe in time there can be alittle more understanding of each other.
 
Gallo, Thanks for the response, both the tone and content. It's actually *not* more than I wanted to read - it's always interesting to see the logic behind someone's position.
In deference to the integrity of the thread, I will simply note that we disagree on the possibility of harm when there is literally no person to be harmed, and move on.

I was going to reply to some of Pentecost2005’s comments, but since s/he is suspended it seems moot… instead, I would like to drag up an old point made by KnightErrantJr that I don’t think was actually responded to:

…they cannot find my religeon valid, because my faith has NO ROOM for gods that are not the God of Christianity. There cannot be a way for polytheism and monotheism to coexist, becuase they are mutually exclusive. But when I get frustrated with them, I have to stop and think that they have not arrived at their faith through logic, but through raw emotion.

The first part of this statement is not fully correct; the second part is fairly offensive, but I will try to respond to it… logically. 🙂

I understand that your faith teaches you there is only one God; mine teaches me that there are many, and that there is no particular reason that yours could not be one of them - miracles, sacrifice and all. Logically, the only point on which I am absolutely compelled to disagree with you - and I do - is the “mono” part of your theism.

I have had what I believe to be a mystical experience of the Presence of the Jewish God in synagogue; I have also encountered what are clearly pagan Gods in other contexts. I believe, along with most mystics of any religion, that it is impossible to adequately describe mystical experience… but I can say (logically 😉 ) that these Presences were clearly of the same order, but also clearly not the same Persons. Thus am I led to my faith, and to the conclusion that polytheism of some form is a more accurate worldview than monotheism (and thus I could not in good conscience accept the call of the Jewish God, for the reasons you mention).

I was raised Lutheran, the son of generations of ministers; and for years I prayed to your Christ for a faith that I did not possess and could neither feel nor understand. Assuming that he is a God, he apparently does not desire my worship; which, since I do not accept the teachings of his cultus, seems reasonable enough… but given my synagogue experiences, it does make me wonder about the presumed connection between him and the Jewish God.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top