T
Think_About_It
Guest
No, I’m suggesting that such things as are dubbed sinful are really as natural as eating and sleeping. I want people to question why God would say that something very natural is a sin (unless of course, it was the edict of superstitious, dessert-dwelling, men, and not necessarily from on high). It’s like the way Jesus implies mental illnesses are caused by demons; of course, now we know there are no such things as demons and never were, and further, that mental problems are caused by structural complications in the brain, synaptic tangling, and inbalances in certain neurotransmitters. Likewise, we ought to know that what is borne into the human race is not sinful, just because it is alleged that it was alleged that it was alleged that an alleged divinity said so. You can accept the challenge and work it out, or you can dismiss it out of preference.Then let’s see what you are recommending the OP to do: engage in mortal sin. This is advice that can not be taken seriously. You are vehemently anti-Catholic, explaining your attempts to drawn the OP from the faith and into sin.
Evidence of what? How is it evidence?Oddly, your position is a lot closer to the truth than many find comfortable!
Life with “blue balls” is not the answer.
But please allow me to rephrase part of the above: “If you need to marry, do so.”
God has already given solid evidence through the Holy Scriptures. It is better to marry than to burn (with lust). What more evidence do we need?
![]()
Life with blue balls, an excessive number of years with blue balls. I’m not going to make the distinction; why should there be any suffering - It’s not very merciful. If there are truths about the world and how we ought to act, they should be easily attained through natural reason. It’s intuitive, you’ll agree, that if there is a need, a physical need to masturbate in order to extinguish discomfort, that the reasonable thing is to do so. Why would a God confound our reason by telling us it’s wrong? It makes very little sense.