Papal candidates - Short List?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mh2007
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Lisa
Well we could get into a lengthy argument because I believe western civ is vastly superior with respect to my belief that human life is sacred, to be protected and that we all have human dignity that is from our humanity, not because of our station in life. But again I grew up in western country and these are my values. Growiing up in the eastern tradition, you will not see the dignity of the person, the protection of every human life, the basic equality that is literally bred into us.
Would you attribute the West’s greatness to Greek philosophy then? I certainly wouldn’t. Its because of Christianity. Therefore if say China one day were to embrace Christianity en masse, particularly in its rational Catholic or Orthodox manifestations, I predict that welding Christian values to its own Taoist and Confucian philosophies, it may truly outstrip the West. Christianity for me is the key, not Greek philosophers. Our conviction of the inherent dignity of man does not stem from Ancient Rome, surely, where men were forced to brutalize themselves in games for the pleasure of a bloodthirsty civic population. It stems from the Torah’s conviction that man is the image of God.

I’m not sure that we can look at countries in other parts of the world and assume that their heritage, that is the philosophies which have an ancient history in these lands, are the cause or even directly connected to their current state of under-development and lack of proper human rights. Don’t forget that only 60 odd years ago most European countries were not democracies. Italy was fascist, Germany Nazi, Spain falangist, Portugal fascist and so on…Our values that we so cherish now were hard won.

There basis however, has nothing to do with Greek philosophy. The West’s historical superiority has stemmed from Jewish and Christian moral teaching on the inherent dignity of man made in the Image of God, which was lacking in the generally cold philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, despite the otherwise richness and profundity, they lacked the heart that only Christ could breath into the husks of Hellenic civilisation. Your words above only serve to confirm for me that it is Christianity which is the univeral religion of God’s love for humanity in the person of Jesus Christ, applicable everywhere and in every culture, whereas Plato and Aristotle or Socrates among others, aren’t. Had Christianity not arrived on the scene, I doubt that a pagan West would have been very humane at all.

I would attribute the West’s greatness too Christianity, not pagan philosophy. China recognizes this. The Communist authorities concluded in a brief a few years back that the reason for the West’s historical cultural greatness was not Enlightenment philosophy but rather Christian teaching. Fact. This led for calls for the government to foster its state-run (anti-Catholic) churches, such as the one that is supposedly Catholic without accepting the pope but following “patriotism” to the Communist state and Mao.
As to you assessment that I’m some kind of spandex yogini who spent a few years looking at crystals and thinking about my past lives…well no that would not be the case.
Au contraire I cannot possibly know how deeply involved you were with Yoga and would not presume too. I am speaking more in a general sense, that in my experience many Westerners do not really pentrate into the depth, richness and variety of Indian philosophy. They are often mired in meaningless, exterior trivialities that are common in the New Age Movement.

Indian philosophy embraces Dvaita and Advaita (Dualism and Non-Dualism) and is a vast repository of wisdom.
At any rate none of this has anything to do with the choice of Pope. I still maintain there is no inherent benefit in picking a Pope based on his country of birth.
No Lisa, sister, on that we are absolutely agreed 👍
 
Dear Lisa

Would you attribute the West’s greatness to Greek philosophy then? I certainly wouldn’t. Its because of Christianity. Therefore if say China one day were to embrace Christianity en masse, particularly in its rational Catholic or Orthodox manifestations, I predict that welding Christian values to its own Taoist and Confucian philosophies, it may truly outstrip the West. Christianity for me is the key, not Greek philosophers. Our conviction of the inherent dignity of man does not stem from Ancient Rome, surely, where men were forced to brutalize themselves in games for the pleasure of a bloodthirsty civic population. It stems from the Torah’s conviction that man is the image of God.

I’m not sure that we can look at countries in other parts of the world and assume that their heritage, that is the philosophies which have an ancient history in these lands, are the cause or even directly connected to their current state of under-development and lack of proper human rights. Don’t forget that only 60 odd years ago most European countries were not democracies. Italy was fascist, Germany Nazi, Spain falangist, Portugal fascist and so on…Our values that we so cherish now were hard won.

There basis however, has nothing to do with Greek philosophy. The West’s historical superiority has stemmed from Jewish and Christian moral teaching on the inherent dignity of man made in the Image of God, which was lacking in the generally cold philosophy of Plato and Aristotle, despite the otherwise richness and profundity, they lacked the heart that only Christ could breath into the husks of Hellenic civilisation. Your words above only serve to confirm for me that it is Christianity which is the univeral religion of God’s love for humanity in the person of Jesus Christ, applicable everywhere and in every culture, whereas Plato and Aristotle or Socrates among others, aren’t. Had Christianity not arrived on the scene, I doubt that a pagan West would have been very humane at all.

I would attribute the West’s greatness too Christianity, not pagan philosophy. China recognizes this. The Communist authorities concluded in a brief a few years back that the reason for the West’s historical cultural greatness was not Enlightenment philosophy but rather Christian teaching. Fact. This led for calls for the government to foster its state-run (anti-Catholic) churches, such as the one that is supposedly Catholic without accepting the pope but following “patriotism” to the Communist state and Mao.

Au contraire I cannot possibly know how deeply involved you were with Yoga and would not presume too. I am speaking more in a general sense, that in my experience many Westerners do not really pentrate into the depth, richness and variety of Indian philosophy. They are often mired in meaningless, exterior trivialities that are common in the New Age Movement.

Indian philosophy embraces Dvaita and Advaita (Dualism and Non-Dualism) and is a vast repository of wisdom.

No Lisa, sister, on that we are absolutely agreed 👍
Vouthon I thought my comments regarding the superiority of western civilization were clearly focused on the contribution of Christianity. I read a fascinating book written by an Indian Christian who straddled both worlds effectively. He was able to demonstrate how the love of Christ and the iihnerent value and dignity of every human person was the reason for the West’s greatness. We can of course credit the Greeks and the Romans (I particularly liked the Stoics outlook) for certain elements but clearly the idea that both women and children had value was not based on Greek or Roman philosophy.

As to my background in eastern religions and philosophy, it’s a combination of personal study, a four year program on spiritual direction that was at a local Episcopal Cathedral which had extensive training and workshops by Buddhists and others from the eastern tradition. As to my experience with Indians, having worked with many Indian doctors (mostly Hindu but a few Muslims as well) I had a lot of discussions with them about regliion and west vs east (fwiw they all want to live in the west!). I’ve always thought New Age was just silly but it’s easy and doesn’t require much effort so appealing to our instant gratification, no pain outlook. BTW this was all pre Catholic days.

What I treasure about the Catholic faith, our current Holy Father and the next Holy Father is the strength and consistency of the message in Christ’s love. Unlike other faith traditions that I’ve encountered, the Chuch engages our minds, hearts and souls.

Lisa
 
CNA has a nice interview with Cardinal Cipriani of Lima, Peru:

God will help choose next Pope, cardinal stresses

I think he says some great things:

“I think that geography has nothing to do with it,” the cardinal said on Feb. 16. “The right person needs to be sought out with the help of God, regardless of where he is from.”

Responding to media questions about whether the new Pope should be from Latin America, he explained that “geographical or political considerations are not going to be part of the conclave.”

While he said that it is “understandable that there are people who think this way,” he warned that it is not good for the media to promote this understanding or to make bets or create “intrigue.”

The action of the Holy Spirit will help the cardinals “to be men who listen to God,” he emphasized. “If not, we serve for nothing.”

Amen. If all the cardinals are approaching the conclave like this, we have nothing to worry about.
 
Tell us why. I want to learn as much as I can about our future Holy Father.
Lisa
Both are disciples of the delightfully holy and orthodox (late) Cardinal Giuseppe Siri. Bagnasco, in particular, has emerged as an opponent to Cardinal Bertone, a symbol of Vatican cronyism and corruption. And both have proven utterly orthodox in their beliefs and practices.

Sadly, both are Italians, which is a disadvantage. Not necessarily because of a desire to elect a Third World Pope but because the Italian bishops’ conference at the moment is somewhat fractured.
 
Married priests would enable men who later in life are drawn to the priesthood to become priests. This would help regarding the perceived shortage of priests in the UK and I suspect this is the cardinal’s motivation here.

Although a lot more could already be done regarding deployment of priests (in the UK anyway) to ensure there are more priests in parishes. Why do universities, hospitals, prisons etc. have to have a priest devoted exclusively to that institution? Surely it would make more sense to count that institution as part of a parish and have the chaplain assigned to the parish as another priest in the parish (but with specific responsibility for the university, prison etc)? But that’s another topic.

It does seem somewhat inequitable when you have Anglican priests etc. who have come over to us already married. Although in the UK they tend not to be given parish responsibilities.
 
Married priests would enable men who later in life are drawn to the priesthood to become priests. This would help regarding the perceived shortage of priests in the UK and I suspect this is the cardinal’s motivation here.

Although a lot more could already be done regarding deployment of priests (in the UK anyway) to ensure there are more priests in parishes. Why do universities, hospitals, prisons etc. have to have a priest devoted exclusively to that institution? Surely it would make more sense to count that institution as part of a parish and have the chaplain assigned to the parish as another priest in the parish (but with specific responsibility for the university, prison etc)? But that’s another topic.

It does seem somewhat inequitable when you have Anglican priests etc. who have come over to us already married. Although in the UK they tend not to be given parish responsibilities.
Brendan you make some good points with respect to non-parish assignments. I could also see expanded use of Deacons for these spiritual needs. We had a temporary priest who had spent most of his time in college or prison assignments and clearly saying Mass and Reconciliation were the LEAST of his duties. For Parishes the Sacraments are where the Priest has a unique and irreplaceable role.

Not a plug for married priests (other than Anglicans) just emphasizing Brendan’s excellent idea!

Lisa
 
For Parishes the Sacraments are where the Priest has a unique and irreplaceable role.
👍

I do think that our dioceses do to much of, “We’ve got a serious shortage of priests and we’re not going to be able to cope in the future without merging parishes, closing churches etc.” while at the same time they don’t stop to think about how they could better deploy the priests they currently have by considering what the key priorities actually are and thinking just a little bit outside the box in terms of deployment of priests. How many priests are carrying out administrative roles in dioceses, seminaries etc. Roles that you don’t need an ordained priest to do. Priests cannot be replaced when it comes to carrying out the Sacraments (and shouldn’t be replaced by downgrading Masses to Liturgy of the Words with Communion). Use priests to carry out the Sacraments and lead the faithful, for other roles use lay-people or, if need be, some deacons.
 
Although I don’t see married priests really coming about, I would say this based on my own personal experience…

When I was young, I was… well… young. I was convinced that the married life was for me. Yet the Church really doesn’t educate the young to discern this or that. Although I have been married to a wonderful woman for nearly 12 years with a 9 year old son, in the last year, I have had an opportunity to reflect and feel that I missed my calling. Either I missed the signs, or the invitation could have been louder to reach me… either way, I am left wondering what could have been.

Vocations, at least 20 years ago, could have been more proactive. Not sure how it all fits into this thread…
 
👍

I do think that our dioceses do to much of, “We’ve got a serious shortage of priests and we’re not going to be able to cope in the future without merging parishes, closing churches etc.” while at the same time they don’t stop to think about how they could better deploy the priests they currently have by considering what the key priorities actually are and thinking just a little bit outside the box in terms of deployment of priests**. How many priests are carrying out administrative roles in dioceses, seminaries etc. Roles that you don’t need an ordained priest to do. Priests cannot be replaced when it comes to carrying out the Sacraments (and shouldn’t be replaced by downgrading Masses to Liturgy of the Words with Communion). Use priests to carry out the Sacraments and lead the faithful, for other roles use lay-people or, if need be, some deacons**.
Wow if only our various Parishes would really reconsider the role of the Priest and where he and he alone can perform the sacraments. Our last Priest was literally run ragged attending meetings, RE sessions (although we have a full time RE Director), fundraising, overseeing grounds and maintenence tasks and other areas that could have been done by the laity. We are blessed to have two wonderful Deacons who can help with some areas but they are not involved in administration so it all fell on our Priest. I realize he must oversee the finances (which are not usually robust in this economy) and have oversight on the physical plant but only from afar IMO.

We had a meeting regarding the appointment of the next Priest and not a single person said they wanted someone who could manage the grounds and attend every council meeting! I suspect this has just been the practice in the day of more Priests per parishioner and as you suggested we need to rethink this model.

As to the actual thread 😉 I think we can look at the Holy Father’s role and I wonder if simply too much was asked of him. Of course his age was a factor and one Cardinal said that he was never the ‘outdoorsy’ type as was JPIII but his energy level and health might have been preserved had he not been forced to deal with “Vati-leaks” and other internal strife.

Lisa
 
Wow if only our various Parishes would really reconsider the role of the Priest and where he and he alone can perform the sacraments. Our last Priest was literally run ragged attending meetings, RE sessions (although we have a full time RE Director), fundraising, overseeing grounds and maintenence tasks and other areas that could have been done by the laity.
I cannot agree more. However, it is the priest, and he alone, who has it in his own power to limit his non-sacramental duties. The first prriority of the ministerial priesthood is to administer the sacraments. Everything else is -]secondary/-] tertiary. He is to administer spiritually and sacramentally to his flock, Second, he is to strengthen his own spirituality (make prayer and silent time for himself!) so that he can inspire with good homilies, can counsel spiritually, and be available for confessions.

Most of the time, lay committees and what-not don’t need him; they just want him, which is frankly selfish of them. They think that his involvement will lend credibility to their group, will ensure more attendance, that kind of thing. They’re not thinking of the priority needs of the whole parish, but of their own cause, whatever it may be.

It’s the priest who must Just Say No.
 
I cannot agree more. However, it is the priest, and he alone, who has it in his own power to limit his non-sacramental duties. The first prriority of the ministerial priesthood is to administer the sacraments. Everything else is -]secondary/-] tertiary. He is to administer spiritually and sacramentally to his flock, Second, he is to strengthen his own spirituality (make prayer and silent time for himself!) so that he can inspire with good homilies, can counsel spiritually, and be available for confessions.

Most of the time, lay committees and what-not don’t need him; they just want him, which is frankly selfish of them. They think that his involvement will lend credibility to their group, will ensure more attendance, that kind of thing. They’re not thinking of the priority needs of the whole parish, but of their own cause, whatever it may be.

It’s the priest who must Just Say No.
You must know our Priest! And you are right, we all want “a piece of him” and like many dedicated Priests he doesn’t want to let anyone down. I would always try to avoid involving him in the minutia of committee and council work but sadly there were always a few who’d corner him after Mass for a lengthy one on one 😦 because their issues were so much more critical than anyone else’s and the Priest had difficulty saying no.

Excellent point about needing time to strengthen his own spirituality. You can give what you don’t have. I am sure their Spiritual Directors are frequently reminding them about this reality.

Lisa
 
If an American could be elected, I am praying for the dark horse in this race:

Cardinal Sean O’Malley, Archbishop of Boston.

He is a healer. The Church needs this more than anything right now in order to get past the terrible clergy sex abuse crisis. If he is elected Pope, it will sent a strong message to the world that the Catholic Church is dedicated to doing whatever it takes to protect children. It will restore people’s faith in the moral authority of its leaders.

He is humble. The only Capuchin in the College of Cardinals and regularly wears his friar’s habit.

He is pastoral. He speaks in a way that draws people to the Church and makes them feel loved even if they have sinned.

He is only 68.

Archbishop O’Malley healed Boston. He could heal Ireland and all of Europe. The Catholic Church must re-evangelize Europe. It cannot afford to loose its cultural base.

The Roman Catholic Church is culturally European and Europe is culturally Catholic. Many Americans do not appreciate this, especially those who have converted as adults and do not have ties to the old country. To understand the Roman Catholic Tradition you have to understand what was happening in Europe over the past 1500 years. Most Americans do not even know what happened in the US over the last 200 years and are totally unaware of the fact that this nation was founded on Calvinist - not Roman Catholic, principles.
O’Malley mentioned as contender for pope

In Italy, media speculate he could be in the mix

Yes!!! 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top