1
1Lord1Faith
Guest
I’ll ask again. What do these textssay?This one stands out as being a case-in-point because the saint writes that the texts used in the celebration of the Immaculate Conception
I’ll ask again. What do these textssay?This one stands out as being a case-in-point because the saint writes that the texts used in the celebration of the Immaculate Conception
I understand FOR YOU this sums up beautifully what you think the Church believes…I am not arguing what you believe or saying you are wrong in your beliefs. All I am asking is you need to HONESTLY and freely admit this document is not about the Beginning of the Church and is only something that is “mentioned in passing” in the document. The Church’s beginnings is not the context of the document.Because it sums up beautifully without extrapolation what it is that the Church believes in ‘right ordering and development of devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary’.
shop.catholic.com
I am not sure I accept, or even follow, your arguments about infallibility, but I do agree with you on the Immaculate Conception. The texts on the beginning of the Church are read on Dec 8 because they apply to Mary.the saint writes that the texts used in the celebration of the Immaculate Conception recognise the beginning of the Church
Agreed. also a Apostolic Exhortation should be considered invalid if it’s content results in the ’ Deposit of Faith ’ being buried. Take for example if Amoris Laetitia undermines our Catholic Ethics and presents us with a New Paradigman Apostolic Exhortation is not necessarily infallible except in certain circumstances. One being that it is pointing to already established and dogmatically defined truths.