Papal letter, the Holy Father's sorrow

  • Thread starter Thread starter catharina
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

catharina

Guest
I’ve seen so many versions of the report on the papal letter to the bishops but I’ve decided this article is precise. It should break our hearts that the Pope is attacked for his goodness letter, pope responds to criticisms over Lefebvrite decisionBy John ThavisCatholic News ServiceVATICAN CITY (CNS) – In a letter to the world’s bishops, Pope Benedict XVI expressed regret that his lifting of the excommunications of four traditionalist bishops gave rise to a storm of protests and bitterness.The pope said the controversy over Bishop Richard Williamson’s statements denying the extent of the Holocaust was “an unforeseen mishap” – one that could have been anticipated, however, by paying more attention to information easily available on the Internet.The pope said he was particularly saddened at the reaction of some Catholics who seemed willing to believe he was changing direction on Catholic-Jewish relations and were ready to —attack me with open hostility.— He thanked “our Jewish friends” who helped clarify the matter and restore a sense of trust…He said his overture to Bishop Williamson and the other three bishops of the Society of St. Pius X was designed to close a wound and bring unity to the church, by lifting excommunications incurred in 1988 and opening the way to dialogue with the society.But when Bishop Williamson’s comments about the Holocaust were circulated, —it suddenly appeared as something completely different: as the repudiation of reconciliation between Christians and Jews, and thus as the reversal of what the (Second Vatican) Council had laid down in this regard to guide the church’s path,— he said.As a result, he said, — an avalanche of protests was unleashed, whose bitterness laid bare wounds deeper than those of the present moment I was saddened by the fact that even Catholics, who, after all, might have had a better knowledge of the situation, thought they had to attack me with open hostility— he said— Precisely for this reason I thank all the more our Jewish friends, who quickly helped to clear up the misunderstanding and to restore the atmosphere of friendship and trust,— he said.The pope acknowledged something critics have pointed out: that a simple Internet search would have revealed Bishop Williamson’s views on the Holocaust and helped the Vatican anticipate the reaction.—I have been told that consulting the information available on the Internet would have made it possible to perceive the problem early on. I have learned the lesson that in the future in the Holy See we will have to pay greater attention to that source of news,— he said.Pope Benedict said he deeply regretted another mistake: that the lifting of the excommunications was not adequately explained and gave rise to misinterpretations about the traditionalist society’s status in the church.He emphasized that the removal of the excommunications was a disciplinary measure that affects individuals. But the fact that the Society of St. Pius X has no standing in the church depends on doctrinal reasons, he said."Until the doctrinal questions are clarified, the society has no canonical status in the church, and its ministers – even though they have been freed of the ecclesiastical penalty – do not legitimately exercise any ministry in the church,— he said…The pope also asked whether the church could be totally indifferent about a traditionalist society that has 491 priests, 215 seminarians, six seminaries, 88 schools, two university-level institutes, 117 religious brothers, 164 religious sisters and thousands of lay faithful.—Should we casually let them drift farther from the church?—he said.He offered a special thought for the society’s priests, saying he did not think they would have chosen the priesthood unless they had a love of Christ and a desire to proclaim the Gospel.—Can we simply exclude them, as representatives of a radical fringe, from our pursuit of reconciliation and unity? What would then become of them?— he said.The pope said he recognized that disturbing statements have often come from the society’s leadership, reflecting —arrogance and presumptuousness.— But he said he has also witnessed —an openness of hearts— among some members.He said the traditionalist society deserves the same kind of tolerance given to other members in the church.—At times one gets the impression that our society needs to have at least one group to which no tolerance may be shown, which one can easily attack and hate. And should someone dare to approach them – in this case the pope – he, too, loses any right to tolerance; he too can be treated hatefully, without misgiving or restraint,— he said.END
 
Apologies for format-glitch My CA connection does this every few days.
 
With all due respect to the Holy Father, that letter raised some interesting thoughts in my mind.
  1. Everyone wants to run the Church.
  2. How is it possible that the stafff of a pope who uses text messaging to send out a daily thought, did not know to pay attention to what is on the internet about Bishop Williamson?
  3. The Holy Father lifted the excommunication. He did not declare it invalid as many people want to say. If it were invalid, there would be nothing to lift.
  4. The canonical status of the SSPX has only changed in that they are no longer excommunicated. Those who believe that it is now OK to join their movement must remember that they still cannot exercise any legitimate ministry in the Church, including the priesthood. They may do so validly, but not legitimately.
  5. It is interesting to think of how many people get upset when a local priest celebrates a valid mass, but fails to observe all the rules in the GIRM, but the same people accept the mass of a priest from the SSPX who cannot legitimately celebrate mass at all. Why does the laity accept that it is OK for one priest who is has no faculties to celebrate an illicit mass and not another who does have faculties?
  6. Are we looking for real fidelity to the Church or are we looking for scapegoats on either sie of the aisle?
  7. What will happen if Bishop Williamson does not get faculties? Will he settle down quietly in some monastery, as some bishops and priests had to do in the past or will he begin a schismatic movement? He is a validly consecrated bishop; therefore,he can start a schism. I’m not hoping for this, just pointing it out.
  8. Bishop Fellay’s response to the letter was not as encouraging as I had hoped. I don’t know if others felt the same way. He still insists that Vatican II cannot be accepted the way that the Holy Father wants, nor can ecumenism or religious freedom. If the Pope yields to Bishop Fellay, who is in charge? If he does not, what does Bishop Fellay do in a Church that will not give him faculties until he submits?
This is not a pleasant situation for anyone involved. We need to pray for the gifts of peace and unity.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
Our poor Holy Father, I love you.:console:
Everyday when my husband and I pray the Rosary together, we always add an Our Father, Hail Mary and Glory Be for you.:bighanky:

Great question on # 5 of your post J.R.👍
Plus, your final sentance was great advice!!
 
Our poor Holy Father, I love you.:console:
Everyday when my husband and I pray the Rosary together, we always add an Our Father, Hail Mary and Glory Be for you.:bighanky:

Great question on # 5 of your post J.R.👍
Plus, your final sentance was great advice!!
That question was not meant to challenge anyone. It just happened to pop up in my mind, because so often on these threads I hear one person complain that the local priest is washing the feet of women at the Holy Thursday mass, so they are going off to the SSPX.

But the priest who celebrates the Holy Thursday mass is in communion with his bishop and with Rome. He has faculties. He has a canonical status in the Church. He has done nothing to deserve suspension or excommunication, since this is not a violation that falls into that category of disciplinary actions. The priest in the SSPX, no matter how holy he may be, has not faculties and has no canonical standing in the Church and is suspended, as per the Holy Father’s rescent letter to the bishops.

I find this behaviour on the part of some Catholics stunning to say the least.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
 
That question was not meant to challenge anyone. It just happened to pop up in my mind, because so often on these threads I hear one person complain that the local priest is washing the feet of women at the Holy Thursday mass, so they are going off to the SSPX.

But the priest who celebrates the Holy Thursday mass is in communion with his bishop and with Rome. He has faculties. He has a canonical status in the Church. He has done nothing to deserve suspension or excommunication, since this is not a violation that falls into that category of disciplinary actions. The priest in the SSPX, no matter how holy he may be, has not faculties and has no canonical standing in the Church and is suspended, as per the Holy Father’s rescent letter to the bishops.

I find this behaviour on the part of some Catholics stunning to say the least.

Fraternally,

JR 🙂
That was exactly the way I took it too. Sometimes I myself have noticed things that were not exactly “done by the book”, I’m not about to run off to the Bishop or yell at the Priest or go off to the SSPX, but on these forumns I may just point it out. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top