M
myfavoritmartin
Guest
Apologies…Ah-hem:
Vicegerent is the official administrative deputy of a ruler or head of state. (Latin: vice (in place of) + gerens (governing).)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicegerent
Apologies…Ah-hem:
Vicegerent is the official administrative deputy of a ruler or head of state. (Latin: vice (in place of) + gerens (governing).)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicegerent
"Meaning of VICEGERENTnot viceregent
vicegerent
2 very different words
No. The Pope is the Servant of Servants. He is not God or act as God. He is much like a Duty and Prime Minister. Besides, the Catechism of the Catholic Church does even say that he acts as God. He is merely an Chief ambassador of ChristSo to properly define this…
He acts as God on earth?
He acts, as the definition indicates, as one who governs with some (not necessariy all) of the authority of the sovereign (God). Doesn’t put him on nearly the same level.So to properly define this…
He acts as God on earth?
Well yeah, Christ is very God. And?..“the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God;”
No. He acts like God’s official administrative deputy, or vicegerent, on Earth because that’s what he is.So to properly define this…
He acts as God on earth?
, present participle of* gerere* “carry on”]vice·ge·rent vīss jrənt ] (plural vice·ge·rents)
noun Definition: **ruler’s administrative deputy: **a deputy appointed to act on the authority of a ruler or magistrate, especially in administrative duties
[Mid-16th century. < medieval Latin, “deputy” < Latin* gerent-
Does anyone here honestly believe that after more than 1,000 posts like this in this forum, MFM is really here to ask questions in an earnest attempt to learn the truth?So to properly define this…
He acts as God on earth?
No problem with it whatsoever. The Pope is appointed by God the Holy Spirit who leads the College of Cardinals in the choice. So he isn’t appointed by mere man but by God.“the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God;”
Let his habitation become desolate, and let there be no one to live in it'; and His office let another take.’From here…
ccel.org/ccel/white/controversy.xlv.html
I found this…
Titles.—In a passage which is included in the Roman Catholic Canon Law, or Corpus Juris Canonici, Pope Innocent III declares that the Roman pontiff is “the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God;” and in a gloss on the passage it is explained that this is because he is the vicegerent of Christ, who is “very God and very man.” See Decretales Domini Gregorii Papae IX (Decretals of the Lord Pope Gregory IX), liber 1, de translatione Episcoporum, (on the transference of Bishops), title 7, ch. 3; Corpus Juris Canonici (2d Leipzig ed., 1881), col. 99; (Paris, 1612), tom. 2, Decretales, col. 205. The documents which formed the Decretals were gathered by Gratian, who was teaching at the University of Bologna about the year 1140. His work was added to and re-edited by Pope Gregory IX in an edition issued in 1234. Other documents appeared in succeeding years from time to time including the Extravagantes, added toward the close of the fifteenth century. All of these, with Gratian’s Decretum, were published as the Corpus Juris Canonici in 1582. Pope Pius X authorized the codification in Canon law in 1904, and the resulting code became effective in 1918.
So what I am understanding is Innocentlll made this bold claim, and it has never been rejected…
Troubling?
Seems fine to me. Of course, you could show us the Latin and there are several scholars who could verify the correct translation, I’m sure.
From here…
ccel.org/ccel/white/controversy.xlv.html
I found this…
Titles.—In a passage which is included in the Roman Catholic Canon Law, or Corpus Juris Canonici, Pope Innocent III declares that the Roman pontiff is “the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God;” and in a gloss on the passage it is explained that this is because he is the vicegerent of Christ, who is “very God and very man.” See Decretales Domini Gregorii Papae IX (Decretals of the Lord Pope Gregory IX), liber 1, de translatione Episcoporum, (on the transference of Bishops), title 7, ch. 3; Corpus Juris Canonici (2d Leipzig ed., 1881), col. 99; (Paris, 1612), tom. 2, Decretales, col. 205. The documents which formed the Decretals were gathered by Gratian, who was teaching at the University of Bologna about the year 1140. His work was added to and re-edited by Pope Gregory IX in an edition issued in 1234. Other documents appeared in succeeding years from time to time including the Extravagantes, added toward the close of the fifteenth century. All of these, with Gratian’s Decretum, were published as the Corpus Juris Canonici in 1582. Pope Pius X authorized the codification in Canon law in 1904, and the resulting code became effective in 1918.
So what I am understanding is Innocentlll made this bold claim, and it has never been rejected…
Troubling?