but you can always say that an invisible guy is up there either making the science, or manipulating the science so we get the wrong idea about the world. You don’t believe something just because there is no evidence proving it false. If a relative of yours died in a car accident you did not witness, and you did not attend his/her funeral, you’d have no evidence proving he/she died. No matter how many records existed or witnesses there were, you’d have no evidence that he/she died, seeing as you didn’t witness her death or funeral yourself. Witnesses could be changing the story. You could not disprove that she escaped the fiery wreckage and it was someone else who was found. Any elaborate excuse or thought we can think of can be thought of as true if it cannot be disproven. Unless you see something, or sense something (with your five senses, not “your heart”) it can’t be proven true. And, if you go as far as to say that your senses can’t be trusted, that someone or something is changing what you see, then anything can be true. This makes the studying or pondering the Universe (if it exists) incredibly incredibly complicated. Nothing could be real at all. Or, anything far-fetched could be real. We could all be living in a centuries old bologna sandwich sitting at the bottom of a sunken pirate ship, or perhaps we are radioactive mice who’ve been sent into a virtual reality by a species of giant flying cats. Can you disprove that?