E
EasterJoy
Guest
It is the duty of the pastor to decide which avenues he will accept in order to ensure that members of his parish are properly disposed to receive the sacraments. The bishop can give him room to require certain formative experiences for those with any capacity to go through them–that is according to Hoyle.In my past experience as a DRE, sacramental prep was a separate program – whether you had a child in the parish school, the parish religious ed program or were homeschooling – that child was to be enrolled in the parish’s sacramental prep program. This was the way the pastor had elected to fulfill his responsibility to ensure children were prepared to receive the sacraments.
I guess I’m not understanding the OP’s concern – is the pastor or DRE denying the sacrament? That would indeed be problematic. There should be a time for the child to receive Communion and he should be seated in the front pew, prayed for at Mass, etc.
However, if they are just saying that a certain date is when the class of children who have been preparing are receiving together, that shouldn’t be a problem. I’m not sure why you’d want to exclude your child from the class but expect to include them in the ceremony?
What is not OK is to make distinctions between those whom the pastor has deemed to be properly disposed to receive the sacraments. That is why a child who was prepared by an appropriate avenue different from his or her peers ought to be treated just the same as those prepared by some other avenue that is more typical.
If the rule is that only children who went through some particular program can receive on the same day, while other children who are equally well-disposed at the same time are excluded, you are making distinctions with no basis. You are protecting a “program” at the expense of recognizing the unity of all the parishioners and the equal sufficiency and dignity of all the ways that the bishop and pastor have deemed are proper preparation for the sacrament.
More to the point; the day is going to come when you are going to hurt a child’s feelings for no reason whatsoever. Why defend that?
When I was in grade school, we used to have catechism classes during school hours, as was allowed by the Supreme Court, in a room in the building that was reserved for use by the parish. When we had parties, however, our instructors saw to it that the parents of all the children not in the class were asked if their child might like to be invited, too, and our non-Catholic classmates were always allowed to join us. When you’re having a group celebration, you ought to look for reasons to include, not reasons to exclude. On the day we had parties, there weren’t Catholics and Protestants. We all had cake together, and that was a good thing.