Y
YADA
Guest
I think this is a response to the factions that demonize people who have more … the politics of pitting the haves against the have nots …What I find wrong about it is that it is directly implying that wealthy people are better than poor people, and that all poor people are lazy whereas the wealthy are universally hardworking. It seems broad, and overly judgmental of economic classes which I don’t think a Christian pastor should be openly supporting.
Example: I’m quite poor and I don’t watch TV, for instance (I find it boring). My friend, who is rich, watches Gossip Girl every nightI read daily, she does not. But we are friends nonetheless, and neither of us are above the other based on economic status. I think God would frown upon those who do judge so one-dimensionally.
Which one of these descriptions fit Jesus Christ, who had little to no money?
You are young - when you say you are poor and contrast your life to your friends … you are really contrasting your parents lives which are the results of their good and bad decisions [all people make good and bad decisions - all] - you have yet to build wealth but a foundation is laid … no one builds wealth [of any kind] in a moment - it takes time, perseverance and discipline … thus that post does not represent a snap shot but a way of life …
You like Under the Dome - so you do watch TV and movies … I bet your friend reads a book or two
If you practice the left side of that pastors post rather than the right side - you may not become a millionaire * but you will be financially secure as opposed to broke … and there is a difference between broke and poor …
And with poverty there are multiple kinds … poverty of character, poverty of friendship, poverty of happiness …
As with wealth - there is more than just dollar amounts … you can be rich in friendships and loving relationships, rich in character and rich in happiness …*