Pastoral Epistles - People of God vs. Mystical Body of Christ

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoelFitz

New member
Recently I have been studying the Pastoral Epistles.

In them it seems that the church is considered as the *People of God *rather than the (Mystical) Body of Christ, as in the undisputed Pauline letters.

Would you agree with this view?

I do not think there is a deep conflict between these two images of the Church, which (in a typical Catholic way) is both. However is the emphasis in the Pastoral Epistles more in keeping with the modern post-Vatican II image of the Church?

I have heard that in the Pastoral Epistles the Church as a Fellowship is not emphasized. Is this correct?

I am very grateful to all here who have replied to some of my posts about the Pastoral Epistles with charity and insight. They have helped me to get insight into these three Epistles, 1 and 2 Timothy and Titus.
 
Hi Noël,

The concept of the Mystical Body is certainly a pauline idea. But, although Lumen Gentium centers on the idea of the people of God (an extension of Israel) it by no means leaves aside the concept of the mystical body, which emphasizes the idea of Christ as supplying the spiritual energy and unity to the people of God :
  1. Christ, the one Mediator, established and continually sustains here on earth His holy Church, the community of faith, hope and charity, as an entity with visible delineation (9*) through which He communicated truth and grace to all. But, the society structured with hierarchical organs and the Mystical Body of Christ, are not to be considered as two realities, nor are the visible assembly and the spiritual community, nor the earthly Church and the Church enriched with heavenly things; rather they form one complex reality which coalesces from a divine and a human element.(10*) For this reason, by no weak analogy, it is compared to the mystery of the incarnate Word. As the assumed nature inseparably united to Him, serves the divine Word as a living organ of salvation, so, in a similar way, does the visible social structure of the Church serve the Spirit of Christ, who vivifies it, in the building up of the body.(73) (11*)
ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/v2church.htm

You may wish to read Lumen Gentium once more; you will realize that the Mystical Body is a central idea of this document.

Verbum
 
Hi Noël,

The concept of the Mystical Body is certainly a pauline idea. But, although Lumen Gentium centers on the idea of the people of God (an extension of Israel) it by no means leaves aside the concept of the mystical body, which emphasizes the idea of Christ as supplying the spiritual energy and unity to the people of God :

ewtn.com/library/COUNCILS/v2church.htm

You may wish to read Lumen Gentium once more; you will realize that the Mystical Body is a central idea of this document.

Verbum
You might, also, want to read Pius XII’s MYSTICI CORPORIS CHRISTI. It was written in 1943 and was very influencial at Vatican II.
vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_29061943_mystici-corporis-christi_en.html
 
Verbum

many thanks for your positive and encouraging reply.

I consider that Catholics believe in both/and, while Protestants focus on either/or.

Thus for us the Church is* both* the People of God and the Body of Christ. But at the present is focusing on the* People of God* more constructive?

I really should study Lumen Gentium. I would also like to study Gaudium et Spes and Dei Verbum.

However you have given me encouragement to read Lumen Gentium. Previously I have only skimmed through it.

Once again, many thanks!
 
I consider that Catholics believe in both/and, while Protestants focus on either/or.

Thus for us the Church is* both* the People of God and the Body of Christ.
snip
I would have to say from my many years in and around Protestant theologies that they are quite comfortable with both the metaphors (Body of Christ/People of God). What they don’t have is a consistent ecclesiology, so their understandings of the implications of the metaphors varies. (Most obviously, as Catholics we make an easy step from “Church is Body of Christ, there is One Body with One Head” to “there is only One Church, to which all believers are more or less perfectly joined.” Protestants have to add the “visible vs invisible” unity step in order to avoid the obvious conclusion of schism.)
 
NHInsider

Thank you for your reply.

I am somewhat out of my depth here in discussing ecclesiology in detail.

We use the term *church *in many different ways. It can mean the building where we worship, or the community of all those who believe in Christ, or the one, true, catholic and apostolic church.

However here I do not want to get into arguments about what is meant by church.

I am thinking that the current emphasis on the church as the people of God is close to the view of the Pastoral Epistles.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top