Just got off work and am free to comment. Well, this is the first time my feathers were ruffled speaking to the Orthdox, after likewise viewing such in the past.
I do think it very sad.
And it is objective fact that most Catholics do not understand or actually know what papal infallibility is. Some remarks made me think that some of the charges were akin to 1800 American restorationists who believe the Catholic church came about several hundred years later, and we make up as we go along.
Likewise, I am of the flock that has been praying for Russia for many, many years.
So it hurts to not see any Christian reciprocity by Orthodox.
If we have aberrations or faults, are the Orthodox instructed to pray for us or to condemn us?
I no longer have my notes from our ‘Roots of the Papacy’ seminar that went through the fall up to December, and don’t have the time to go back to last December to find the thread to share with others here where I took notes by the suspect American regent theologian.
Where I am in my faith is universal Catholic and now more than ever, am most thankful a Greek Orthodox pastor has allowed me to go to vespers there in the evening and also seeks restoration of our sacred unity.
We only went to around 300 AD, and were not able time wise to go to 600 AD in the history of Latin papacy. But I remember a certain Pope Callistus, himself a former slave, and then freed, was able to do some kind of accounting work, did some kind of wrong doing and could not serve the church in any capacity for 12 years. He did become pope. Then there was a certain bishop who…if I recall properly, would not restore good standing to an apostate Christian. Pope Callistus excommunicated the bishop…and the entire Christian world acquiesed to the pope. Eventually several bishops came forward to address the pope in regards to the bishop, who himself was then restored.
In this example, the pope was more a pastor than following orthodox law dealing with apostates.
You go to the present today. Seventy per cent of the American bishops did not go along with P Francis regarding some new pastoral practices for divorced and remarried. Going back again, P Paul VI requested that all seminaries around the world teach in Latin. They refused.
The pope can never contradict the deposit of faith in Christ. I even asked my seminary professor that if a pope goes against faith or moral teaching in some form, to then consult my catechism for the answer, and he said yes.
So again, there is nothing to add to doctrine, going back to the Council of Nicea. There are no new dogmas to draw on the practice of the tradition of faith.
Popes speak today when publicly to the world, the Living Revelation of Christ, in other words, how we should respond to the Lord in the world today. And as Pope John Paul II exhorted in ‘Veritatis Splendor’, we likewise are to listen to the voice of our conscience.
Anyway, I remain in the Latin Church, pray for the Orthodox, but yes, the remarks and attitudes did pain me. There needs to be alot more humility and forgiveness on both sides.
God bless.