If some are criticizing it for showing Mormons in a poor light, and some are criticizing it for putting Mormons in a good light, then it must be a pretty balanced show.
If only that were the case . . .
The problem with the word “balanced” is that it is pretty meaningless in many circumstances; the issue isn’t “balanced” - it is accurate.
A program about Mormon beliefs does not need to be balanced - it needs to be accurate. Balance is a ludicrous idea - the truth is what is needed.
And the facts speak for themselves; it was a made-up religion which still denies exploration of the history which may lead to relevation of the fact it’s a load of moonshine.
Those are the facts of Mormonism - it is a lie, false, chicanery and so forth. These are the facts of the case, and they are not in dispute by anyone who has studied the matter at any depth. The Mormons themselves excommunicate those who are “intellectual” - and the leaders of the cult admitted it on the program!
A “balanced” report which has pro-Mormon groups telling the contradictory tale of the golden plates etc. as if it were true and also has people saying, “Well, they can be pretty controlling” is nothing of the sort.
A balanced report would have Mormons saying “I believe this” and non-Mormons saying “I believe this” and then having the two of them provide evidence. Evidence was sadly lacking - from the Mormon side because it wasn’t supplied, and from the non-Mormon side because they were simply never featured.
It was a romanticised depiction of a dangerous, treasonous, treacherous cult that is a threat to the souls of millions and a stain on the reputation of Christianity.
Balanced? If by balanced you mean that we should give lies equal creedence to truth, then count me out. I decry the very idea.