D
Della
Guest
Yes, I noticed that, too. Don’t know how the quote was wrong.For the record, CopticChristian did not say that, I did.
I can’t say what another’s motives might be, but I wanted to clarify the Church’s position for you and others.I was not making a judgment call about the Catholic Church. To me (and I could be wrong) Coptic Christian’s response to me seemed to take a jab at Pentecostals for not accepting infant baptism. However, in many ways Catholics are more exclusive when it comes to things like communion, while Pentecostals practice open communion for all Christians.
I couldn’t disagree more, but this isn’t the thread to discuss that issue–we don’t want to coopt the OP’s topic. So, if you wish, please start a new thread on this. then we can talk about it there. :tiphat:This is a fundamental difference in point of view between Catholics and Pentecostals. Pentecostals do not believe that baptism initiates one into the faith. Putting one’s trust and faith in Christ, confessing him as lord and savior, and receiving the grace and forgiveness that he offers into our lives does that. For this to happen, one must first hear and understand the Gospel. Thus, refusing to baptize infants is not excluding them from anything.
And, there’s nothing objectionable about that. However, it doesn’t replace baptism, but once, again we need a new thread to discuss it properly.Pentecostals do not exclude anyone. Whosoever will let him come. We have ministered to and had mentally handicapped persons accept Christ in our church. Do they know the fine points of theology? No, but they know that Jesus loves them and lived, died, and rose again for them so that they might have life and have it more abundantly.
The Church teaches that we are all born with original sin, so baptism is necessary for all persons regardless of their age. We too trust in God’s love and mercy for unbaptized persons of every age. And the Church teaches that baptism may be, besides water baptism, one of desire (meaning the person would have wanted it if he had known about it or been able to receive it) or by blood (martyrdom). The Church must teach what Christ taught and not go beyond that.For infants who die before reaching the point of being able to understand or for those who are mentally incapable of understanding whatever their age, we trust that we serve a God of love, mercy, wisdom, and justice and that he has everything under control.
As for communion, the Church asks that non-Catholics not receive because it is a sign of unity–of belief and of community. If one does not believe in Christ’s real presence then one does not believe what the Church teaches and so should not receive. The early Church was quite restrictive about who could receive communion because it did not want to a) desecrate Christ’s Body and Blood, and b) it did not wish to put souls in danger of receiving unworthily, as St. Paul warned about in 1 Cor. 11:27. The Church still must do what it determines is best in all matters of faith and morals.