C
ConfusedLucy
Guest
That’s probably the case and it makes it harder to draw comparisons over history of how religious people were as individuals.
Wouldn’t that imply that many people were simply faking religiosity to avoid such costs? Wouldn’t faking it be worse?Many people who in the past would be “nominal” Christians are today choosing to be unaffiliated with any religion because doing so does not exact a political or social cost.
Many people see them as an either/or, which is baffling to those of us who never had any trouble seeing them as complementary.I guess people see science as a superior alternative to religion, instead of being beautiful complementaries?
Not necessarily faking it. Just indifferent. Lots of people are indifferent to religion; I don’t think that is a new thing.Wouldn’t that imply that many people were simply faking religiosity to avoid such costs? Wouldn’t faking it be worse?
Just because somebody is not religious, does not mean they are Godless. I know plenty of people who believe in God but just do not belong to any one religion in particular. They find religion to be untrustworthy, in a nutshell.A secular school system tends to create godless people as does a secular media.
Faith has to be lived in a culture.
Of course.Just because somebody is not religious, does not mean they are Godless. I know plenty of people who believe in God but just do not belong to any one religion in particular. They find religion to be untrustworthy, in a nutshell.
The second sentence doesn’t invalidate the first.
- clouds tend to bring rain.
- just because there are clouds doesn’t mean it is going to rain.
Oh really?.. how unfortunate… not.People are less and less religious.
Because parents aren’t teaching kids to be religious.Why?
Why would we want to change it?What will change this?