F
fhansen
Guest
From God. Our ability or inability to control them come from us, even if control requires the choice to partner with Him.
Last edited:
Greate. We however have good and evil appetie, love and hate for example. Isn’t God the creator of the both?From God. Our ability or inability to control them come from us, even if control requires the choice to partner with Him.
Because God respects freedom- and he has to, because he is all-good, all-knowing and all-powerful. It would be abuse of power if he stopped us from being evil. He also only tolerates evil temporarily. We, humans, are not all-powerful neither all-knowing. Humans stopping humans makes sense because we are equal. Also, if God really wanted to stop sin then no one would have any meaning in sinning- any murderer would just give up on entire murder thing if he knew it can’t work because God will stop him. Removing sin itself means removing motivations behind sins, which is in turn denial of our freedom. It is just that any effects of sin are temporary except effects of our sins on ourselves. If I kill someone he will be resurrected anyway- but I am the one whose soul will be damaged and that can lead to permanent consequence of Hell. It is same concept as with “Why doesn’t God just show to everyone and show them that He exists?” thing.I don’t understand why God tolerates this evil.
That comes from wrong assumption that without God’s creation there would be nothing- or rather from definition of nothing…Greate. We however have good and evil appetie, love and hate for example. Isn’t God the creator of the both?
So you think that we bring bad into the world? How we could if we had only good nature? How could we possibly experience bad if everything including our nature was good? We need to have evil nature to feel hate. We are not creator of our nature.That comes from wrong assumption that without God’s creation there would be nothing- or rather from definition of nothing…
Perhaps without God creating anything there would have been only hate and evil things. After all, God is what is good. Definition of good is “comes from God”, not vice-versa. Therefore if God allows us to separate from himself he allows us to bring on the world everything bad, and to have everything bad. Default state without God is not neutral, but evil.
No, but we are allowed to choose. Our nature was good by default until we chose to deny it, and hence it transformed. That is original sin- though Sin did exist through Satan even before.So you think that we bring bad into the world? How we could if we had only good nature? How could we possibly experience bad if everything including our nature was good? We need to have evil nature to feel hate. We are not creator of our nature.
Are you saying that the origion of sin returns to Satan? Did He feel the pride before commiting the promise to become enemy of human? Where the feelings come from?No, but we are allowed to choose. Our nature was good by default until we chose to deny it, and hence it transformed. That is original sin- though Sin did exist through Satan even before.
So you think that our nature is pure evil?I am saying that without God, universe is evil, not neutral. We can choose to either bring out bad or good. Freedom is good but can be abused. Heat is good thing- without it, life is almost unimaginable… though burning people is a bad thing. Good things can be abused- that is essentially freedom.
Moral good, moral evil, physical good, physical evil.Vico:
Does good is existence?Normally pain improves health and well being over time. When pain is considered evil it is because it takes place in conjunction with an evil act, but the pain then is the unpleasant consequence of evil, not evil itself.
[175] Summa Contra Gentiles (Aquinas) III, 71299 …On many occasions the Church has had to defend the goodness of creation, including that of the physical world.[155] …
310 … But with infinite wisdom and goodness God freely willed to create a world “in a state of journeying” towards its ultimate perfection. In God’s plan this process of becoming involves the appearance of certain beings and the disappearance of others, the existence of the more perfect alongside the less perfect, both constructive and destructive forces of nature. With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.[175]
311 … Angels and men, as intelligent and free creatures, have to journey toward their ultimate destinies by their free choice and preferential love. They can therefore go astray. Indeed, they have sinned. Thus has moral evil, incommensurably more harmful than physical evil, entered the world. God is in no way, directly or indirectly, the cause of moral evil.[176] He permits it, however, because he respects the freedom of his creatures and, mysteriously, knows how to derive good from it: …
312 … God in his almighty providence can bring a good from the consequences of an evil, even a moral evil, caused by his creatures …
314 With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.
https://dhspriory.org/thomas/ContraGentiles3a.htm#71… evil and defects occur in things ruled by divine providence as a result of the establishment of secondary causes in which there can be deficiency, it is evident that bad actions, according as they are defective, are not from God but from defective proximate causes; but, in so far as they possess something of action and entity, they must be from God. …
There was no apple. That is not in the Bible.It wasn’t just a choice between ignorance and free will. It was a choice between God and sin. God didn’t want us to eat of the apple, so it was a sin. The first sin which started history and the world as we know it today.
If you choose the apple you choose knowledge which is a good thing, but with it comes evil, sin, natural disasters and everything bad we experience.
Was it really a good idea to eat the apple?
Can you deny the existence of evil nature which creates the feeling of anger which is not due to righteousness?Not in the Christian scenario. For example, there’s a righteous, healthy kind of anger that we can exhibit: moral outrage, for example, that detests evil when we see it; this anger comes from the right place and can result in good. There is also a more common underlying anger in this world that hates goodness, or just hates, and that causes harm. They may both be based on an innate good desire and faculty but the human will can distort those desires and faculties and use them for it’s own purposes, seeking some lesser perceived good.
We can look and aspire towards something higher, a higher level of righteousness, or not. We can choose to gossip about some person and their failures, to make ourselves feel better about ourselves, perhaps, or we can take the higher moral road and choose not to gloat over such things and desire a better future for the person. We can choose -whether to express virtue or not. In any case all evil is committed in the pursuit of some perceived good.
Moral good, moral evil, physical good, physical evil.
Catechism
Does good is existence? Yes or no?299 …On many occasions the Church has had to defend the goodness of creation, including that of the physical world.[155] …
310 … But with infinite wisdom and goodness God freely willed to create a world “in a state of journeying” towards its ultimate perfection. In God’s plan this process of becoming involves the appearance of certain beings and the disappearance of others, the existence of the more perfect alongside the less perfect, both constructive and destructive forces of nature. With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.[175]
311 … Angels and men, as intelligent and free creatures, have to journey toward their ultimate destinies by their free choice and preferential love. They can therefore go astray. Indeed, they have sinned. Thus has moral evil, incommensurably more harmful than physical evil, entered the world. God is in no way, directly or indirectly, the cause of moral evil.[176] He permits it, however, because he respects the freedom of his creatures and, mysteriously, knows how to derive good from it: …
312 … God in his almighty providence can bring a good from the consequences of an evil, even a moral evil, caused by his creatures …
314 With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.
Vico:
Moral good, moral evil, physical good, physical evil.
Catechism
Does good is existence? Yes or no?299 …On many occasions the Church has had to defend the goodness of creation, including that of the physical world.[155] …
310 … But with infinite wisdom and goodness God freely willed to create a world “in a state of journeying” towards its ultimate perfection. In God’s plan this process of becoming involves the appearance of certain beings and the disappearance of others, the existence of the more perfect alongside the less perfect, both constructive and destructive forces of nature. With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.[175]
311 … Angels and men, as intelligent and free creatures, have to journey toward their ultimate destinies by their free choice and preferential love. They can therefore go astray. Indeed, they have sinned. Thus has moral evil, incommensurably more harmful than physical evil, entered the world. God is in no way, directly or indirectly, the cause of moral evil.[176] He permits it, however, because he respects the freedom of his creatures and, mysteriously, knows how to derive good from it: …
312 … God in his almighty providence can bring a good from the consequences of an evil, even a moral evil, caused by his creatures …
314 With physical good there exists also physical evil as long as creation has not reached perfection.
I don’t understand the question. Is it 1) does good exist, or 2) is existence good?
Is existence good? Sorry for mistype.I don’t understand the question. Is it 1) does good exist, or 2) is existence good?
Something that has some existence, has some good, but there can be no pure evil – it would not exist.Vico:
Is existence good? Sorry for mistype.I don’t understand the question. Is it 1) does good exist, or 2) is existence good?
“For freedom we have been set free”… but because freedom is what it is, the possibility of abusing it hangs in the balance. It is the risk God takes for the possibility of a personal, loving relationship with you and me.Why isn’t God morally obligated to stop all evil that he can stop like we are, or aren’t we?