C
C.Longinus
Guest
How does the doctrine of Mary’s perpetual virginity necessitate Joseph also being a perpetual virgin?
It doesn’t necessitate it. There’s a pious tradition regarding Joseph as an older man with children by his deceased wife, and another that he was a young man intending to remain a virgin like Mary.How does the doctrine of Mary’s perpetual virginity necessitate Joseph also being a perpetual virgin?
Where did you get this idea?Joseph also being a perpetual virgin
From this thread:Where did you get this idea?
The same question could be asked for a non-virginal Joseph. What is your point,
I know of no such doctrine.There is no doctrine on the perpetual virginity of Joseph to my knowledge. Please enlighten me if I am wrong![]()
Well that doesn’t really tell us either way, as all of us are called to chastity. A widower who only ever had relations with his first wife would also be chaste.An interesting thing to note, in the Litany of St. Joseph, one of his titles is “Chaste guardian of the Virgin” . So do with that as you will.
I am currently reading Jerome’s letters; if / when I come across this letter, I’ll confirm or deny.I think St. Jerome in his letter against Helvidius said that St. Joseph preserved his virginity due to Our Lady. (Apologies to St. Jerome if I misquoted him!)
Yes. That was his conclusion in paragraph 21, emphasis mine:I think St. Jerome in his letter against Helvidius said that St. Joseph preserved his virginity due to Our Lady. (Apologies to St. Jerome if I misquoted him!)
- But as we do not deny what is written, so we do reject what is not written. We believe that God was born of the Virgin, because we read it. That Mary was married after she brought forth, we do not believe, because we do not read it. Nor do we say this to condemn marriage, for virginity itself is the fruit of marriage; but because when we are dealing with saints we must not judge rashly. If we adopt possibility as the standard of judgment, we might maintain that Joseph had several wives because Abraham had, and so had Jacob, and that the Lord’s brethren were the issue of those wives, an invention which some hold with a rashness which springs from audacity not from piety. You say that Mary did not continue a virgin: I claim still more, that Joseph himself on account of Mary was a virgin, so that from a virgin wedlock a virgin son was born. For if as a holy man he does not come under the imputation of fornication, and it is nowhere written that he had another wife, but was the guardian of Mary whom he was supposed to have to wife rather than her husband, the conclusion is that he who was thought worthy to be called father of the Lord, remained a virgin. (source)