H
HPM1984
Guest
Good point and I think ALL devout Christians can find solace in this point you made.Because if you love Jesus, you want to serve Him by serving others.
Good point and I think ALL devout Christians can find solace in this point you made.Because if you love Jesus, you want to serve Him by serving others.
Acctuallly StewStew from an argument (meaning gathering facts and data to support a conclusion) there is nothing wrong with a personal example as long as it is particular. (this is the old Qualitative vs Quantitative argument, nether is superior they a just different ways of looking at things)Well-said and I take your point, HPM, but “particular examples” in this forum are often anecdotal and therefore personal. I’m not sure such examples would assuage you, .
I agree to some degree… although, God’s Word (the Bible), itself says to use God’s Word (the Bible) to test all doctrine and to correct one another with it. So much of the truth written in St. Paul’s letters to the Romans and Galatians, and ESPECIALLY St. Peter’s own letters has been lost in *practice *(not in the teachings of the magisterium, but in practice– which makes ALL the difference).This is exactly true. Since Protestants cannot admit/do not believe that Jesus actually gave the keys to the kingdom to Peter and created the Church, they are left with only the Bible and their “personal” relationship to Christ. I feel sorry for them…
Yes, I believe you are correct, but if you don’t mind, I think put a bit strongly. We do need that personal relationship where we experience that warmth of Jesus in and around us.I agree to some degree… although, God’s Word (the Bible), itself says to use God’s Word (the Bible) to test all doctrine and to correct one another with it. So much of the truth written in St. Paul’s letters to the Romans and Galatians, and ESPECIALLY St. Peter’s own letters has been lost in *practice *(not in the teachings of the magisterium, but in practice– which makes ALL the difference).
I would tend to prefer the poor protestants’ personal faith in and relationship with the “limited” Christ of the Bible over the borderline superstitious belief in certain rituals/rules/laws acted out by the many millions of un-evangelized Catholics. Many of these un-evangelized semi-practitioners of the Catholic faith would be hard pressed to even mention the name of Jesus in public… *that’s *sad.
This comes from a cradle-regular-Sunday-Mass-attending-Catholic for 20 years (who remains Catholic) evangelized by a few weeks of protestant preaching on the radio… (see my post on the “no sense of community” thread in this forum for a little more background)
I have to disagree with you here. There are some things that the Catholic Church has done, changes made that were asked for by protestants, but saying that the Catholic Church instituted many (almost all) of the changes demanded by protestants is not right. There are things that go on in some Catholic churches that are similar to protestant churches or are done to be like or draw in protestants but our beliefs are not the same. There are some similarities and common ground but not protestant.I do like the word Protester even more than Protestant. Because it is a reminder that Protesters were Protesting SOMETHING…and that means that they wanted something to change and wanted to be part of that thing that changed. That “thing”, in this case being the Roman Catholic Church. I find it sad and ironic that the RCC instituted many (almost all) of the changes demanded by the Protesters (not immediately of course- and very slow) but by then the gulf (in my opinion) had grown to wide and as I have said before, the words and actions had wounded to deeply.![]()
They put emphasize on this to undermine the Church Jesus built. it is an individualistic way of saying I dont need the Church, all I need is Jesus to be personal with me.What is it? And what is the standard for determining whether one has it?
This is primarily a question for protestant evangelicals - I hear this term “personal relationship with JC” quite a bit, but looking for an operational definition.
Be very careful with listening to Protestant radio programs…For Catholic ears, they may seem like honey but there are many errors…I am cautious, even wary, because I was not properly catechized and I am not sure my conscience is properly formed. In fact, I highly doubt that it was, since I lost all contact with the Church after my mother died when I was 10. The Protestant radio shows can seem quite exciting and dynamic, but can lead serious Catholics into sin. Our Church is not like their denominations. We are not them and they are not us. I think we can learn from some of what they do, but we should not become like them. A good parish can have a great sense of community, yet still be doing things the “Catholic” way.I agree to some degree… although, God’s Word (the Bible), itself says to use God’s Word (the Bible) to test all doctrine and to correct one another with it. So much of the truth written in St. Paul’s letters to the Romans and Galatians, and ESPECIALLY St. Peter’s own letters has been lost in *practice *(not in the teachings of the magisterium, but in practice– which makes ALL the difference).
I would tend to prefer the poor protestants’ personal faith in and relationship with the “limited” Christ of the Bible over the borderline superstitious belief in certain rituals/rules/laws acted out by the many millions of un-evangelized Catholics. Many of these un-evangelized semi-practitioners of the Catholic faith would be hard pressed to even mention the name of Jesus in public… *that’s *sad.
This comes from a cradle-regular-Sunday-Mass-attending-Catholic for 20 years (who remains Catholic)** evangelized by a few weeks of protestant preaching on the radio… **(see my post on the “no sense of community” thread in this forum for a little more background)
of the changes demanded by protestants is not right. There are things that go on in some Catholic churches that are similar to protestant churches or are done to be like or draw in protestants but our beliefs are not the same. There are some similarities and common ground but not protestant.I have to disagree with you here. There are some things that the Catholic Church has done, changes made that were asked for by protestants, but saying that the Catholic Church instituted many (almost all)
Not only do I remember this song from my Protestant days, I actually have a recording of it!Once protestant, I used to hear this phrase a lot. It usually means have you accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior? Are you saved? Now every time I hear it, it reminds me of an old song, Me and Jesus, we got our own thing going. We don’t need anyone to tell us what it’s all about.
Phrased another way, “There is no such thing as a Lone Ranger Christian.”Not only do I remember this song from my Protestant days, I actually have a recording of it!
I think this pretty much sums things up. In that particular Protestant view church isn’t bad but it’s not a necessity for salvation whereas in a Catholic view salvation takes place within the context of the Church which Christ has given to us. In a Protestant perspective there are many options, not imperatives, for church participation. In a Catholic perspective the Church is the vessel through which we receive and participate in the sacraments, the scriptures, the tradition, the apostolic succession, the community of the faithful and the communion of the saints. Salvation separate from all of these through which Christ gives himself to us just doesn’t make sense.
It summa, it is in teh CC that one can know and obey all that Christ commanded.Not only do I remember this song from my Protestant days, I actually have a recording of it!
I think this pretty much sums things up. In that particular Protestant view church isn’t bad but it’s not a necessity for salvation whereas in a Catholic view salvation takes place within the context of the Church which Christ has given to us. In a Protestant perspective there are many options, not imperatives, for church participation. In a Catholic perspective the Church is the vessel through which we receive and participate in the sacraments, the scriptures, the tradition, the apostolic succession, the community of the faithful and the communion of the saints. Salvation separate from all of these through which Christ gives himself to us just doesn’t make sense.
hard to take issue with you good thoughts!@HPM1984, you mentioned,
I would agree with you that it is a quick christianity. But upon reflecting on the outreach of these Billys, they did touch so many people to open their hearts and let in the rays of light from God in one big act of acceptance. In one moment, something happened that would not have happened if they hadn’t presented the oportunity, namely a sudden colapse of their total defense of their pride, and seeing the real love of Jesus for the first time, which so overwhelmed and captured them. I think of those presenting this call from Jesus as I would of St. John the Baptist, who was preparing the people to know and follow Jesus. Once they know and experience his love even for a short moment, something changes within a person. They are now different and want to be one with him, making possible a journey to search for him. It sends them on their “WAY”.
"But no question easy believism is on the rise- but where did it come from???
Billy Sunday, then Billy Graham & then a host of Pentecostal and Evangelical Preachers swamped many of the Protestant denominations (mainly Baptist, Assembly of God, Campus Crusade and Intervarsity), with the Roman Road & the Sinner’s Prayer… whammo you have a “once saved always saved Christian,Cheap and Easy Christianity”
Just a thought.
Thanks for coming here and sharing with us. One suggestion I’d make is to break down your message into more manageable segments so that people can engage with you. Taken as a block it feels like an attack which is not what I think you intend. We all have a story to tell. For instance, I found the Truth in the Catholic Church in ways I never did in the Protestant church. I’m sure others here have stories far more interesting than mine.Having a personal relationship with Jesus is another way of saying I am ‘born again’. Romans 10:9-10 says it all. This is the Truth I searched for for years! I NEVER learned this through the catholic church. When you confess your sins and accept Jesus into your heart, you commit yourself to living your life for Him. Your life changes. You are a new person. The old is gone and the new is here. You are also guaranteed a place in Heaven. NOT purgatory! There is no such thing as purgatory or limbo.
We are born again in Baptism. Our personal relationship develops over time as we spend time with our Lord. The Holy Spirit gives us the power to live out what we believe in our daily lives.Having a personal relationship with Jesus is another way of saying I am ‘born again’. Romans 10:9-10 says it all. This is the Truth I searched for for years! I NEVER learned this through the catholic church. When you confess your sins and accept Jesus into your heart, you commit yourself to living your life for Him. Your life changes. You are a new person. The old is gone and the new is here. You are also guaranteed a place in Heaven. NOT purgatory! There is no such thing as purgatory or limbo.