Planned Parenthood argues for post-birth abortion

  • Thread starter Thread starter MJE
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MJE

Guest
Some maybe shocked today but over time they will get comfortable with this ‘right’

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa Laport Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html
 
weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html

This is a video with the testimony in the Florida legislation.

There is a trial that is never mentioned in the main street media going on now - the Gosnell Murder trail which resulted in the deaths of many woman and also deaths of many live-born babies through use of scissors to their spinal cord and brain.

nationalrighttolifenews.org/news/2013/03/gosnell-murder-trial-ends-for-the-week-with-another-heated-exchange/#.UVXTa5Okqec

There are so many of these woman today on youtube that have surviced abortion and who are speaking out such as Giannia Jensen, Meliisa Ohden, Claire Culwell

youtube.com/watch?v=kPF1FhCMPuQ
 
Our current Present voted against a state Infants Born Alive act while in the IL Senate.
 
Some maybe shocked today but over time they will get comfortable with this ‘right’

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa Laport Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html
obama voted twice in opposition to legislation requiring that infants born of botched abortions be given sufficient care to stay alive. So really, this is just Obama policy.
 
I wonder why they were “shocked.” I’m not at all surprised. Saddened, yes, but not surprised. 😦
 
THIS organisation is being given hundreds of millions of tax dollars annually
 
Some maybe shocked today but over time they will get comfortable with this ‘right’

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa Laport Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html
"…those situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45 minutes or an hour away, that’s the closest trauma center or emergency room. You know there’s just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns about.”
I wonder if she sees the same “logistical issues” for the mother if, after an abortion, a trauma center was needed?

Jon
 
And you can just wait for the Mainstream Media to give this story a big leaving-alone.
 
Saw another thread on this after posting. Legislators are trying to address this - born alive babies.
Gosnell faces seven counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of newborns whose spines he allegedly snipped with scissors after late-term abortions. He faces the death penalty if the jury finds him guilty
Also on trial is Eileen O’Neill, 52, of Phoenixville, an unlicensed medical school graduate who worked as a doctor in Gosnell’s clinic. She is not charged with performing abortions
Because of this trial, where the patient was killed with too much demerol(death certificate says homicide) and the incidents of many born alive babies who are then murdered which no one talks about as the main street media just pretends this trial hasn’t been going on for two weeks. If convicted he will get the death sentence and I bet we will never hear his name if he is convicted.
 
Oh no! That breaks my heart. What has happened to our country…!
 
They’re just being logically consistent. 🤷 The only difference between the child before and after is location, if its ok to kill the child just moments ago when she/he was in the womb why in the world would it be any worse to kill it a minute later when it is in a different location.
 
Some maybe shocked today but over time they will get comfortable with this ‘right’

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa Laport Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

weeklystandard.com/blogs/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-right-post-birth-abortion_712198.html
Why is anyone even mildly surprised? In Europe, they get to kill them as adolescents. Look up the Groeningen Protocol.

Once people accept abortion as a ‘right’ absolutely anything goes.
 
Planned Parenthood does not see being born as an automatic reprieve if the intent has been to kill the child all along.

As an aside, Peter Singer has proposed allowing post birth abortion for up to six months, to give the parents a chance to change their mind if they find the child unsatisfactory in some way.
 
They’re just being logically consistent. 🤷 The only difference between the child before and after is location, if its ok to kill the child just moments ago when she/he was in the womb why in the world would it be any worse to kill it a minute later when it is in a different location.
Yep. It’s just post-partum abortion. :eek:

Jon
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top