Planned parenthood attacks food pantry!

  • Thread starter Thread starter MomaMary8
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They believe in choice, unless that choice is something they do not believe in.
 
It is so obvious that this is a planned attack on the Church to make Catholics look unreasonable. They are doing their best to take away our freedom of religion by mounting these attacks.

*The American Life League reports what the worker at the pantry said:
All I told the young lady from Planned Parenthood was that I couldn’t send a truck to pick up, and gave her a list of other food pantries that might want to pick up, I gave her no reason at all and she didn’t ask why. Soon after, I started receiving the hate e-mail and phone calls. I politely explained to callers that although we are non-denominational in regards to those we serve, we are a Catholic organization who shares a board of directors with our sister organization, St. Vincent de Paul. We adhere to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church and to the Rule of St. Vincent de Paul. I also explained our Gift Acceptance Policy and how acceptance of the donation would compromise our core values and possibly damage the reputation of Paul’s Pantry.*
 
Oh my! These PP folks seem to know how to get you coming and going, don’t they? You are damned if you do not give to them, and you are damned if you don’t take from them.

However, they do show themselves for what they really are eventually. With comments like those made on Facebook regarding worries over the inferred “content” of the prospectively donated canned goods, it is clear to see this is a campaign to discredit and not an overblown misunderstanding stemming from a genuine desire to perform a charitable act.
 
I think I shall make a donation to Paul’s Pantry. St. Michael defend us in battle!
 
They want to vilify the Roman Catholic Church in the public mind, and assail the principles of its founder…Jesus Christ. It’s time to expose Planned Parenthood as an extraordinarily evil entity by not only attacking its corrupt founding principles, but also by shining the brightest light possible on the corruption of its foundress…Margaret Sanger.

It is time to take the gloves off and play hardball with these miscreants. We should be brazen and bold to raise up in the public discussion the genuinely evil aspect of Margaret Sanger, occultist, drug addict, and racist. She is Planned Parenthood…she is its black heart and soul.

We have Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, as our core and fundament; Planned Parenhood has…Margaret Sanger. There needs to be a great effort made at contrasting the two progenitors of these two disparate groups. In doing so it becomes easy to divide right from wrong, good from evil. No amount of relativism can bridge the great chasm which exists between the two sides.

We proudly display our Lord and Saviour’s images inside and outside of our churches and homes. Let’s make Planned Parenthood display their idol, Margaret Sanger, in front of each and every abortion mill (figuratively). Then the whole world can be constantly reminded that this grotesque organization of evil was founded by a women inspired by hatred and malice. We must pull Sanger out from the shadows at every possible turn, because she cannot stand the light of day. She is Planned Parenthood’s very own, “Picture of Dorian Gray”.
 
unafraid said:
It is time to take the gloves off and play hardball with these miscreants. We should be brazen and bold to raise up in the public discussion the genuinely evil aspect of Margaret Sanger, occultist, drug addict, and racist. She is Planned Parenthood…she is its black heart and soul.
Click to expand...
I’m not interested in Sanger. She’s a boogeyman long dead and I can’t think of anyone who would care. Even PP doesn’t talk about Sanger.

What I am interested in the modern Planned Parenthood and its attacks on our faith and on our Church’s activities, and it’s the modern PP that we must oppose.
 
Rich_Olszewski said:
I’m not interested in Sanger. She’s a boogeyman long dead and I can’t think of anyone who would care. Even PP doesn’t talk about Sanger.

What I am interested in the modern Planned Parenthood and its attacks on our faith and on our Church’s activities, and it’s the modern PP that we must oppose.
Click to expand...
👍
 
Rich_Olszewski said:
I’m not interested in Sanger. She’s a boogeyman long dead and I can’t think of anyone who would care. Even PP doesn’t talk about Sanger.

What I am interested in the modern Planned Parenthood and its attacks on our faith and on our Church’s activities, and it’s the modern PP that we must oppose.
Click to expand...
Planned Parenthood is always depicted as some innocuous “preventive services” clinic providing women’s health to the downtrodden. It is like they are pouring perfume on a festering, noxious mass. Attach the awful Sanger to it, and suddenly, people begin to peel back the veil, and then they look and find the true dispicable nature of this movement, or death-cult (which it really is).

To the uninformed, “Communism”, as a concept, sounds pretty harmless, until you attach Josef Stalin to it; “National Socialism” , on its face, sounds like a banal political movement, until Adolf Hitler’s grim aspect is cast upon it. Planned Parenthood, and all of the language surrounding it is deliberately (and deceptively) couched in the sort of semantic duplicity which makes it seem somehow humanitarian, and selfless. Attach the horrid portrait of Margaret Sanger to it and it becomes more difficult for such obfuscation to succeed.

The greater public needs to be informed about Margaret Sanger , because, when you frame Planned Parenthood within her venal visions and beliefs, it becomes easier for the mass perceptions to recognize the utter depravity it represents. Sanger , in all of her unholy glory is, and must be shown to be, the face of Planned Parethood. Ugly.
 
unafraid said:
Planned Parenthood is always depicted as some innocuous “preventive services” clinic providing women’s health to the downtrodden. It is like they are pouring perfume on a festering, noxious mass. Attach the awful Sanger to it, and suddenly, people begin to peel back the veil, and then they look and find the true dispicable nature of this movement, or death-cult (which it really is).

To the uninformed, “Communism”, as a concept, sounds pretty harmless, until you attach Josef Stalin to it; “National Socialism” , on its face, sounds like a banal political movement, until Adolf Hitler’s grim aspect is cast upon it. Planned Parenthood, and all of the language surrounding it is deliberately (and deceptively) couched in the sort of semantic duplicity which makes it seem somehow humanitarian, and selfless. Attach the horrid portrait of Margaret Sanger to it and it becomes more difficult for such obfuscation to succeed.

The greater public needs to be informed about Margaret Sanger , because, when you frame Planned Parenthood within her venal visions and beliefs, it becomes easier for the mass perceptions to recognize the utter depravity it represents. Sanger , in all of her unholy glory is, and must be shown to be, the face of Planned Parethood. Ugly.
Click to expand...
The problem is that most people support eugenics. If you see Down’s Syndrome, 90% of Down’s Syndrome babies are aborted. To end abortion, we would have to convincingly explain the value of those with Down’s Syndrome.

I’ve only seen two ways of addressing this.
messengers2.com/articles/disabilities/eugenics_and_down_syndrome.htm
The argument that all have purposes and that we dare not interfere with the purpose of a child.

It is not that most people are aghast and hate all moral evil. Most people hate moral evil that affects THEMSELVES more than moral evil that affects others although sometimes they are also touched by that. The link between hurting someone with Down’s Syndrome and suffering of one’s self is not easily apparent. Philip Ney has suggestive research on the negative psychological health effects of children born into families that have suffered abortions, post abortion survivor syndrome.

Perhaps when abortion survivors such as Gianna Jesson are able to sue the country and receive damages, then people will see that abortion is child abuse, no more women’s liberation than being a neglectful mother.
 
Woowwwww… for once, I am in lock-step with every single poster here. Wow.
 
ByzCathCantor said:
However, they do show themselves for what they really are eventually. With comments like those made on Facebook regarding worries over the inferred “content” of the prospectively donated canned goods, it is clear to see this is a campaign to discredit and not an overblown misunderstanding stemming from a genuine desire to perform a charitable act.
Click to expand...
What do you expect from people that profit from the murders of children?
 
SamH said:
What do you expect from people that profit from the murders of children?
Click to expand...
I didn’t suggest that anything more or less could or should be expected.

It was interesting to ponder their repugnant retort, as even Satan seems to exhibit more tact and discretion.
 
The term “full-on thug” used in the article to describe PP is perfectly apt. This is an evil organization if ever there was one. This attempted “donation” was just part of a PR campaign by them to discredit a Catholic group. They are bullies and menaces, and, sadly, many people still fall for it.

They can see the handwriting on the wall… that more and more young people are awakening to the fact that abortion does, indeed, take a life, and that there will be an end to their murderous industry.
 
The PP are good at making a public grand-stand for themselves. But using hunger to get attention for a possible new clinic in that area is so very much again the trials of Jesus in the judgement hall of the Herod palace. :ehh:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top