Are you aware that the method used for aborting the fetus in an effort to keep the upper body intact, known as partial birth abortion, is illegal in the U.S.? This type of abortion is performed in order to keep the body parts intact so they can be sold. for medical research[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
Vaccines for polio, chickenpox, rubella, and shingles are examples of sucess.
If you read between the lines, they’ve been using cell strains grown in petri dishes that were gathered before the 1960’s.
Salk used HeLa cells…NOT fetal tissue… to develop the polio vaccine.[BIBLEDRB][/BIBLEDRB]
Vaccines for polio, chickenpox, rubella, and shingles are examples of sucess.
[/ur]
Others have addressed this. But even if in theory scientific advancements were made, this remains on par with the Nazi experiments, who also claim to have made medical advancements. But I think anyone who thinks its okay to sacrifice someone against their will in the name of science is kind of a hypocrite unless they sacrifice themselves and insist that they be killed and harvested themselves.
In other words, the attitude we see is “I’m totally okay with sacrificing people for scientific research as long as it isn’t me!”
.
Lol I made the same argument to someone, when they tried to explain to me it was for research, and showed me the responds Planed Parenthood gave.Others have addressed this. But even if in theory scientific advancements were made, this remains on par with the Nazi experiments, who also claim to have made medical advancements. But I think anyone who thinks its okay to sacrifice someone against their will in the name of science is kind of a hypocrite unless they sacrifice themselves and insist that they be killed and harvested themselves.
In other words, the attitude we see is “I’m totally okay with sacrificing people for scientific research as long as it isn’t me!”
.
What is hypocritical is benefiting from the end result and complaining about the method.Others have addressed this. But even if in theory scientific advancements were made, this remains on par with the Nazi experiments, who also claim to have made medical advancements. But I think anyone who thinks its okay to sacrifice someone against their will in the name of science is kind of a hypocrite unless they sacrifice themselves and insist that they be killed and harvested themselves.
Such has ALWAYS been the case in medical research. How many cancer patients do you think would participate in clinical trials if they knew they were the ones getting the placebos?In other words, the attitude we see is “I’m totally okay with sacrificing people for scientific research as long as it isn’t me!”
What is hypocritical is benefiting from the end result and complaining about the method.
Such has ALWAYS been the case in medical research. How many cancer patients do you think would participate in clinical trials if they knew they were the ones getting the placebos?
I suppose it’s almost to be expected, given the magazine’s reputation, but a priest writing in the Jesuit magazine America, chides not the grisly procedure, but the makers of the video, for being “unfair.” Just amazing. See article here.
Thanks for bringing that to our attention. Here's a link to the actual articleAh-ah. Not so fast. Remember that children under 18 have no legal standing, and the authority to consent (or not) is delegated to their parents. Which is exactly what we have here: the women coming for abortion sign the consent form.But I think anyone who thinks its okay to sacrifice someone against their will in the name of science is kind of a hypocrite unless they sacrifice themselves and insist that they be killed and harvested themselves.
NO.Are you okay with the fact that PP is breaking the law?
Except these people were birthed, and therefore had started life as a human being even in terms of laws that allow abortion. Then they were killed to recover their heads etc. to sell, what the doctor has admitted to is a homicide, although it remains to be seen whether it could possibly be proven to have happened.Ah-ah. Not so fast. Remember that children under 18 have no legal standing, and the authority to consent (or not) is delegated to their parents. Which is exactly what we have here: the women coming for abortion sign the consent form.
Per the website:. Thus the $30-100 would potentially be 100% profit. A few of those every day could add up to thousands and thousands of dollars in a year.
Moral considerations aside, these people are idiots. Set yourself up for charges of organ trafficking for a mere $86K per year? Seriously? And the fun part is that this company pays PP $50 per liver, and then resells the distilled cells for $500 and up. So that’s obviously where the real money is and the PP people could have trivially set up the business structure to get a cut of this money while being completely clear in the legal sense.This is a Procurement Log of baby parts harvested from Planned Parenthood Mar Monte’s flagship abortion clinic in San Jose, CA, on January 10, 2013. A total of 9 specimens were harvested from 8 different fetuses by StemExpress. At the time, StemExpress paid Planned Parenthood $50/specimen, so this one day of procurement at one clinic yielded $450 for Planned Parenthood Mar Monte. StemExpress also harvests from PPMM clinics in Sacramento, Fresno, and Stockton, and so a similar yield at those clinics just one day per week means at least $1800/week, $7200/month, and $86,400/year for this Planned Parenthood affiliate.
MarcoPolo has set up a straw man saying that the fetuses did not consent to have their organs harvested. But since the fetus cannot make a statement of will for obvious reasons, the authority to make such consent is delegated to the woman, who, obviously, did consent to organ harvesting.If the mothers had consented to the process described, which doubtless they did not at all, they would have participated in said homicide.
Between organs and tissues, there seems to be a difference. We will see, this story is being updated every day.MarcoPolo has set up a straw man saying that the fetuses did not consent to have their organs harvested. But since the fetus cannot make a statement of will for obvious reasons, the authority to make such consent is delegated to the woman, who, obviously, did consent to organ harvesting.
No, you didn’t address why you won’t donate your body to science, right now while you are alive and healthy, if you think it’s good to sacrifice a person in the name of science.What is hypocritical