Planned Parenthood: Wanting fewer blacks 'understandable'

  • Thread starter Thread starter peregrinus_WA
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

peregrinus_WA

Guest
If there is any doubt that Planned Parenthood is still following Sanger’s vision, this should put a lot of it to rest:
Planned Parenthood: Wanting fewer blacks 'understandable’
Abortion provider says ‘yes’ when ‘donor’ wants to reduce minorities
Posted: February 27, 2008
8:33 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Click to expand...
A student-run magazine at UCLA has revealed an undercover investigation in which representatives of Planned Parenthood, the nation’s abortion industry leader, admitted willingness to accepting a financial donation targeting the destruction of an unborn black baby.
Click to expand...
Lila Rose, who edits The Advocate, previously revealed how Planned Parenthood officials expressed a willingness to conceal statutory rape, an investigative piece that earned her an appearance on The O’Reilly Factor.
Click to expand...
Full Story
Click to expand...
Planned Parenthood has been targeting the African American Community for years. It has been reported that now they are going after the Hispanic community by placing their “services” in those communities also.
 
Yet, we don’t hear about this on the news. This issue is just ignored.😦
 
deb1 said:
Yet, we don’t hear about this on the news. This issue is just ignored.😦
Click to expand...
What do you expect. The MSM is complicit in the left’s attempt to control minorities or eliminate them if they do not conform to them.
 
Wasn’t Sanger heavily into Eugenics and worked on the program with the same guy that Adolph Hitler hired?
 
Margaret Sanger was heavily into eugenics. You don’t hear about that though - she’s always portrayed as a selfless fighter for women’s rights.
 
And you wonder why Obama supports abortion.

To please the white men ya think?
 
I saw the video of the phone calls. Here’s the difficulty:

We, as pro-life Catholics, see the abortion as killing a black baby (and rightly so). The pro-abortionists(and the media) see it as helping a black mother. So, they would be thrilled that someone could choose to help an under-privileged minority. It would be the same for them as it would be for us, say, to set up a fund to help poor black families feed their kids or something along those lines. So the rest of the world does NOT seem this as racism, just trying to help a particular ethnic group. We know better, of course, but you’ll have a hard time convincing others who think abortion is a good thing to see that. 😦
 
pumpkinbeast said:
I saw the video of the phone calls. Here’s the difficulty:

We, as pro-life Catholics, see the abortion as killing a black baby (and rightly so). The pro-abortionists(and the media) see it as helping a black mother. So, they would be thrilled that someone could choose to help an under-privileged minority. It would be the same for them as it would be for us, say, to set up a fund to help poor black families feed their kids or something along those lines. So the rest of the world does NOT seem this as racism, just trying to help a particular ethnic group. We know better, of course, but you’ll have a hard time convincing others who think abortion is a good thing to see that. 😦
Click to expand...
I was thinking the same thing. The details in the article do not give any indication that the PP representative was racist. It would take a lof of inferring to believe that.

Do I think PP is racist? Yes, I’ve seen it with my own eyes. But, this particular example appears to be strained just a bit.

For example, when the caller was attempting to get a concrete answer from the PP rep (which I noted didn’t happen) the rep did answer with an affirmative sound, but did not respond in a like manner. Well, what was the rep supposed to do, get weirded out and lose money?

I’ve been in the position of fundraising and although I’ve never crossed moral bounds, I understand smiling and saying “mhmm” “mhmm” to build rapport and get a donation.
 
hasikelee said:
I was thinking the same thing. The details in the article do not give any indication that the PP representative was racist. It would take a lof of inferring to believe that.

Do I think PP is racist? Yes, I’ve seen it with my own eyes. But, this particular example appears to be strained just a bit.

For example, when the caller was attempting to get a concrete answer from the PP rep (which I noted didn’t happen) the rep did answer with an affirmative sound, but did not respond in a like manner. Well, what was the rep supposed to do, get weirded out and lose money?

I’ve been in the position of fundraising and although I’ve never crossed moral bounds, I understand smiling and saying “mhmm” “mhmm” to build rapport and get a donation.
Click to expand...
I had the same thoughts that you & pumpkinbeast mentioned, & that this woman probably believes she is helping an African American woman. But then I think she gave enough “uh mhmm’s” to be really questionable to anyone who hears it. I think the woman named Autumn was the one to say “that’s understandable”, & she definitely repeated she was excited. I agree she may have been repulsed & was just trying to get the $, but I think any mainstream American that is able to hear this will be shocked that she didn’t disagree strongly with the guy.

There were lots of other examples with other employees, too. Maybe we are giving them too much credit.
 
Well, Sanger was a racist, that is a fact. PP was set up to get rid of minorities in particular, that is a fact.
 
Or being racist or being abortionist, curious chapter!!!. The two options are very powerful in the current world.
 
I am reading Salvation is from the Jews by Roy Schoeman. It is a very well referenced work and in it he documents how the ideas and writings Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, were used by the Nazi’s in formulating their policies and procedures in their eugenics program. Planned Parenthood from its inception has been a eugenics project. This should not shock anyone.
 
b_justb said:
I am reading Salvation is from the Jews by Roy Schoeman. It is a very well referenced work and in it he documents how the ideas and writings Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, were used by the Nazi’s in formulating their policies and procedures in their eugenics program. Planned Parenthood from its inception has been a eugenics project. This should not shock anyone.
Click to expand...
This does not surprise me in the least. Planned Parenthood need to be prosecuted for “hate” against minorities and the handicapped.
 
b_justb said:
I am reading Salvation is from the Jews by Roy Schoeman. It is a very well referenced work and in it he documents how the ideas and writings Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, were used by the Nazi’s in formulating their policies and procedures in their eugenics program. Planned Parenthood from its inception has been a eugenics project. This should not shock anyone.
Click to expand...
True, but Sanger was only part of a much larger movement in the US & UK which was adopted – or I should say carried to its conclusion by the Nazis.

Please check out The War against the Weak by Edwin Black.
 
Eugenics was quite popular before World War II. However, after the world saw the atrocities associated with such ideas, most of the groups in America fell out of favor. However, PP just found a new angle: a woman’s right to choose. Instead of advertising it as Eugenics they advertised it as a choice. I have heard proponents of this “choice” say that, in reference to babies that are expected to be born with a mental or physical handicap, it is a life not worth living. Adolf Hitler and the doctors associated with him used a very similar defense when they murdered thousands of handicapped people in the 30’s, before they focused there attention on the Jews and other ethnic and religious groups they disliked, including Poles and Catholics.
 
pjn6444 said:
Eugenics was quite popular before World War II. However, after the world saw the atrocities associated with such ideas, most of the groups in America fell out of favor. However, PP just found a new angle: a woman’s right to choose. Instead of advertising it as Eugenics they advertised it as a choice. I have heard proponents of this “choice” say that, in reference to babies that are expected to be born with a mental or physical handicap, it is a life not worth living. Adolf Hitler and the doctors associated with him used a very similar defense when they murdered thousands of handicapped people in the 30’s, before they focused there attention on the Jews and other ethnic and religious groups they disliked, including Poles and Catholics.
Click to expand...
Is eugenics out of favor? I must disagree. Genetics have brought it to a whole new level. They now test for “possible defects” and try to force infanticide on women whose child have these “possible defects”. Even after the child is born, some advocate infanticide up to a certain age.

Eugenics gone? Not by a long shot.:mad:
 
peregrinus_WA said:
Is eugenics out of favor? I must disagree. Genetics have brought it to a whole new level. They now test for “possible defects” and try to force infanticide on women whose child have these “possible defects”. Even after the child is born, some advocate infanticide up to a certain age.

Eugenics gone? Not by a long shot.:mad:
Click to expand...
Exactly. There’s also Dr. Kevorkian and those who think like him.

I’ve said it before: the Nazis were ahead of their time. They would fit in nicely in today’s society. :mad:
 
LRThunder said:
I’ve said it before: the Nazis were ahead of their time. They would fit in nicely in today’s society. :mad:
Click to expand...
Hate to say it, but many of the tenets of the Nazi are now espoused by today’s modern liberal movement. No, they have not gone away, just repackaged. 😦
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top