L
LisaA
Guest
Great post and certainly bears repeating. As someone who converted during the abuse scandal and as someone who has had a LOT of personal and professional interaction with homosexuals a) I was not surprised by the behavior of these men and b) the upper eschelons in some cases didn’t understand the real problem (predatory homosexuals) and thus thought that the men could either be cured or solve the problem by getting them out of the specific enviornment. It speaks to your point of men who have been insulated from “the real world” in many areas, from personnel to accounting to best practices in organizations. Further the insular nature made it difficult if not impossible to address the problems…if the public KNEW what would happen? Those in crisis management in business generally suggest get the problem out into the “disinfectant of sunshine” as Justice Learned Hand stated. Obviously the cover up proved nearly as problematic as the abuse.I respect what you’re saying, and at one point I had a similar faith-crisis, until I realized that when it came to my own crisis (not necessarily yours), my faith had been weak to begin with. Our faith is not in men (or women!). Our faith is in the Holy Spirit who guides the True Church of Jesus.
Two things about that:
(1) Its leaders are sinners, some of them heavy sinners like the rest of us.
(2) Its leaders sometimes manage poorly.
The latter is the key point that too many Catholics, ex-, and anti- don’t seriously consider.
Seminaries train men for the priesthood, and most of that training is still largely spiritual in nature, not practical – although there have been adjustments to the training of priests in the last 10 years. We will also begin to see gradual changes (maybe faster than we expect) in management capability as the Church continues to accept into its ranks priests and deacons who come from careers in the world, in which they have managed successfully and know the heck what an HR department is.
Direct and indirect changes will diminish the previous ill-advised tendency for self-protection and “damage control,” and increase (hopefully!) transparency. This general commitment to justice on the practical level continues to be a priority need of the Church, and I don’t just mean in the area of sexual abuse, but in the case of many other documented incidents of extremely poor clerical management – for example, in hiring and firing of diocesan employees. There are many, many cases on the local level in dioceses which have demonstated gross mismanagement.
We are looking at the end result of an older generation of priests, bishops, cardinals, who were not trained in modern understandings about accountability, transparency, and employee dignity in church settings. Their consciousness and courage about these issues has varied according to both their personal character AND according to the leadership they themselves received. (Some older clerics have had a high level of moral consciousness about their relationships with laity! Others, not so much.) Some of these men did not examine the consequences of secrecy and immunity and the model of authority they themselves were trained in.
I know of at least one person who is working in my region on institutional procedures in a diocese for bringing any sex abuse complaints to light. That’s being done as a joint lay-clerical effort. My own diocese has such established procedures already, and is very high-profile, having been in the national news about that. They lag behind in other areas of management (hiring/firing procedures), so there are still many areas of improvement. The continued need for improvement does not mean that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the Church; it means that just like us individuals, there is need for improvement.
I think there was a period of cultural decline in the seminaries. When converting I read about certain seminaries being known for homosexual activity and chaste, orthodox applicants were denied entrance. Also think there was a time when the seminary was a safe place for a homosexual to “hide” because there were no questions about marriage and children. Perhaps one of the few positive aspects of homosexuality no longer being such a negative label, is that those who were drawn to the priesthood for less than spiritual reasons have other career paths.
Also encouraging is the number of second career priests. Our seminary has been bursting at the seams and a number of the men are not young and inexperienced but have had successful careers in business, medicine, education, etc. So I am cautiously optimistic about the futue of the Church.
Lisa