I know that you don’ t know what you are talking about based on the scientific errors you keep repeating.
You miss the point. You repeating this is a ‘just-so’ statement. At least you now go on to make an argument. It’s not that hard is it? Although, for the sake of honest debate I note that you’ve dropped your back-flip on claims at mind-reading!
Where you were able to tell people my reasons for posting.
The molecular evidence disallows the possibility of a bottleneck of two individuals in the human lineage.
Excepting that the M-Eve shows a ‘bottleneck’, at a mitochondrial level.
You seem to miss the point of this all; based on the ‘bottleneck’.
a) M-Eve shows us all coming from one ancestor, as far as a mitochondrial legacy
b) there may have been ‘others’ about her, but that does not negate the ‘bottleneck’ because their existence is not part of the chain of life to which we belong.
Look at this, it shows how confused evolutionists can be…
The ME represents that woman whose mitochondrial DNA (with mutations) exists in all the humans now living on Earth. That does not mean that she is our lone woman ancestor. We have ancestors who are not via matrilineal descent. For example, our father’s mother (who did pass on her mitochondrial DNA to her daughters) is an example of an ancestor who is not matrilineal to us. However, she did exist at one time and was probably of the same age as our mother’s mother, who is a matrilineal ancestor of ours and from whom we got our mitochondrial DNA.
talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/mitoeve.html
However although this says that we did not get our mitochondria from our father’s mother, it’s irrelevant, because our father’s mother must, as a descendant also from M-Eve have gotten her mitochondria from M-Eve.
Our father must have got it through his mother’s mother, and so on. Thus it does not matter how many people existed AT THE TIME OF EVE, and as noted she herself would not have been an M-Eve in her own time, she herself, as the M-Eve of all us, in a bottleneck.
Note also, the ‘proof’ for her…
The existence of the Mitochondrial Eve is NOT a theory; it is a mathematical fact (unless something like a multiple-origins theory of human evolution i.e. the human species arose independently in different geographically separated populations, and that the present-day ease of interbreeding is the result of a remarkable convergent evolution, is true. Few people subscribe to the multiple-origins theory, and the Mitochondrial Eve observation is a refutation of multiple-origins).
Ibid.
Note they say it’s a mathematical fact, UNLESS… an intersting ‘conditional’ fact.
