A
I, for one, welcome this call to action!!!
could anyone briefly state what the message of the pontiff is…It would be good to read
CHAPTER IV
THE LAITY
In LUMEN GENTIUM.
vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html
This is the spirit of which Vatican II was based on and which Pope Benedict XVI is pointing to, in his call to the Laity.
Jim
There shouldn’t be a power struggle:What I want to see is how the Church both deals with the increase in the dependency on the Laity and the power shift that it causes. It seems to me that Rome and the local Bishops are trying to assert more top down control of doctrine in the last few years. But empowering the Laity will be a challenge to that. This might be painful, but I think a good thing in the long run.
It presents the importance of the laity and the need for the laity to be more actively involvedcould anyone briefly state what the message of the pontiff is…
That is a popular misconception. When we speak of our own “importance”, we lose sight of our call to serve the Church unselfishly and with humility. Each of us are called to support the Church, the faithful and God’s children according to our talents, in faith, love and charity.It presents the importance of the laity and the need for the laity to be more actively involved in the mission of the Church in both parish life and in the sacraments.
There should not be a power struggle, I agree. The problem being that the Church has been forced to move from a Laity of observers to a Laity of participants, this is what Vatican II was about in many ways. The problem is that vocations have declined even more since then and the role of the Laity has become even more important. This is why I did not call it a power struggle, but a power shift.I’m glad there’s more “top down control of doctrine” - we need a bit of focus, there’s been too much dissipation of energy as everyone has been making it up as they go along.
Be good Christians.could anyone briefly state what the message of the pontiff is…
PreciselyBe good Christians.
:banghead:Not word one about “authority” of the laity…responsibility without authority is just bad from so many perspectives…I rare mis-step from His Holiness IMHO
You summarized my thoughts in one sentance. Like it or not the Priesthood is shrinking. Either Mass becomes less frequent, the Priesthood is opened up to more people / different forms, or let the Laity share more in the life and decision making of the Church.Not word one about “authority” of the laity…responsibility without authority is just bad from so many perspectives
There shouldn’t be a power struggle:
In fact we should stop thinking about power when it comes to the Church.
To be a bishop, priest or deacon is to serve.
Empowering the Laity means they are more informed and active in their roles. It should not follow that they constitute a “new” magisterium.
I’m glad there’s more “top down control of doctrine” - we need a bit of focus, there’s been too much dissipation of energy as everyone has been making it up as they go along.
Then you’re rejecting the article from the Pope, which is in the OP.That is a popular misconception.
We’re not speaking of “OUR” own importance but the importance of the laity as the body of Christ which is the Church.When we speak of our own “importance”, we lose sight of our call to serve the Church unselfishly and with humility.
To support the Church means to serve others. But make no mistake about it, we are part of that Church and an important part.Each of us are called to support the Church, the faithful and God’s children according to our talents, in faith, love and charity.
Hardly. One can be a lay minister of every visible kind every Sunday, yet fail to be a witness of Christ and His Church in everyday life.Then you’re rejecting the article from the Pope, which is in the OP.
Then what did you mean by"We’re not speaking of “OUR” own importance but the importance of the laity as the body of Christ which is the Church.
It presents the importance of the laity …