J
josie_L
Guest
I think everyone needs a group hug, :grouphug:What do you deem to be third-best? Eastern Orthodox?
I think everyone needs a group hug, :grouphug:What do you deem to be third-best? Eastern Orthodox?
No Kumbaya?I think everyone needs a group hug, :grouphug:
It’s not kosher.No Kumbaya?
I said nothing that an honest communicant of the Roman communion wouldn’t have also affirmed…unless of course you think that it is possible that your church is not what it claims to be. (Don’t worry; I already know that’s not possible for you. That’s my point, in fact. We’re equally committed to our distinctives.)Well, we’re not the only ones who need to bring those barriers down:
For what it’s worth, I personally agree with your point. The official position of the Catholic Church is that Orthodoxy is indeed orthodox. But the reality is most Orthodox consider Catholicism heretical and some consider us completely devoid of grace…to say Orthodoxy is “second best” is an honor many Orthodox would never accord to Catholicism.I wouldn’t expect most Orthodox would consider their choice of Ecclesial Communion to be the “next best thing.” When Catholics publicly call the Orthodox Churches “second best” or deficient it just builds up those barriers to communion that still persist.![]()
Exactly. I’m not going to lie and say that there is no division between us. I called Eastern Orthodox the next best thing because it’s true that they aren’t in full communion with us. EO is better than being a Protestant but not as good as being in full communion with the one universal Church founded by Christ. This is how the Catholic Church sees it, and this is a Catholic website. I didn’t say that what they have is totally bad. In fact, I was saying they are almost perfect. And, I included aFor what it’s worth, I personally agree with your point. The official position of the Catholic Church is that Orthodoxy is indeed orthodox. But the reality is most Orthodox consider Catholicism heretical and some consider us completely devoid of grace…to say Orthodoxy is “second best” is an honor many Orthodox would never accord to Catholicism.
Exactly. I’m not going to lie and say that there is no division between us. I called Eastern Orthodox the next best thing because it’s true that they aren’t in full communion with us. EO is better than being a Protestant but not as good as being in full communion with the one universal Church founded by Christ. This is how the Catholic Church sees it, and this is a Catholic website. I didn’t say that what they have is totally bad. In fact, I was saying they are almost perfect. And, I included ain my post, so I don’t know why they interpreted what I said as hateful.
![]()
Why do you both feel a need to typify who’s the second best and third best and what not? We all believe that our Churches are all the best, hence why we’re members of them. Is really any need to continue beyond that?For what it’s worth, I personally agree with your point. The official position of the Catholic Church is that Orthodoxy is indeed orthodox. But the reality is most Orthodox consider Catholicism heretical and some consider us completely devoid of grace…to say Orthodoxy is “second best” is an honor many Orthodox would never accord to Catholicism.
I said that the Eastern Orthodox are almost perfect. I don’t think there’s any more charitable way to say it from a Catholic point of view. I wouldn’t be offended if an EO said they viewed us that way.Why do you both feel a need to typify who’s the second best and third best and what not? We all believe that our Churches are all the best, hence why we’re members of them. Is really any need to continue beyond that?
That might be my fault, sorry. I just saw “the Orthodox are second best,” and I felt a need to say something. I wasn’t trying to imply anything by that, so you have my apologies.I’m still confused as to what this has to do with my conversion, since I did not become Eastern Orthodox…![]()
Wait, I thought all of you guys were crossing your fingers and whispering “I hope Rome names us as the second-best church” over and over?Why do you both feel a need to typify who’s the second best and third best and what not? We all believe that our Churches are all the best, hence why we’re members of them. Is really any need to continue beyond that?
Oh, well I’m personally glad to hear that something wasn’t my fault; it’s nice to hear every once and awhileHmm. I didn’t read it that way. Livingwordunity’s post #37 in combination with #48 seem to conflate OO and EO. Not that it matters, it just all seems very weird and off-topic to me. I wasn’t offended, just confused.
That almost sounds like some sort of bizarre, ecclesiastical beauty-pageantWait, I thought all of you guys were crossing your fingers and whispering “I hope Rome names us as the second-best church” over and over?
\end{tongue in cheek}
Be nice Kosta. :tsktsk:That almost sounds like some sort of bizarre, ecclesiastical beauty-pageant.
Do you mean the mitres? Coptic Orthodox priests wear those during the liturgy, so I would assume this is something they carried over into the Catholic church that came from that tradition.In the video of the liturgy with the pope it shows Coptic priests wearing the priestly hats concelebrating,youtube.com/watch?v=kP60lZtMRns. Did Coptic Catholic priests always wear these or has Patriarch Sidrak reintroduced them? I have never seen Coptic Catholic priests wear these before.
Thank you I didn’t know if they were called mitres or something else. I know they are used in the Coptic Orthodox Church but I have never seen them used by the Coptic Catholics as they are very latinized.Do you mean the mitres? Coptic Orthodox priests wear those during the liturgy, so I would assume this is something they carried over into the Catholic church that came from that tradition.