O
opus101
Guest
Pope Francis: “Money indicates the whole spirit of worldliness: money, vanity, pride - that path…It is truly ridiculous that a Christian, a true Christian…wants to go along the path of worldliness.”
ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-christians-must-reject-worldliness-like-st.-francis/
I love how the Pope is such a great sign of contradiction, just like Our Lord. His words certainly fly in the face of the “health and wealth” gospels that are so popular today. I absolutely love this fact, and it really draws a line in the sand for Catholics who have fallen for that kind of thing.
But,after reflecting on this, another thing became evident to me as well: the irony of some of the “progressive” parishes that preach only part of the Gospel - that of social consciousness only. The odd thing is (at least around here), these are the wealthiest parishes. I mean, the people are really well off, even very rich. Could it be that, for some, stressing the social aspects of the Gospel, and ignoring certain moral aspects, salves their consciences on certain issues? There is a certain self-satisfaction that can say “It’s ok for me to be so rich as long as I give some of it away and put myself forward as a proponent of a “progressive” agenda” and “It’s okay for me to contradict the moral teachings of Christ and His Church because I volunteer now and then at the soup kitchen.”
By the same token , the same thing can be applied to those who promote certain moral teachings of the Church while ignoring certain social aspects. Pope Francis addressed this recently.
If we are going to call ourselves Catholics, we better start representing the whole of the faith, and not just what suits us! Let’s follow Pope Francis’s example of being a “sign of contradiction.”
ncregister.com/daily-news/pope-christians-must-reject-worldliness-like-st.-francis/
I love how the Pope is such a great sign of contradiction, just like Our Lord. His words certainly fly in the face of the “health and wealth” gospels that are so popular today. I absolutely love this fact, and it really draws a line in the sand for Catholics who have fallen for that kind of thing.
But,after reflecting on this, another thing became evident to me as well: the irony of some of the “progressive” parishes that preach only part of the Gospel - that of social consciousness only. The odd thing is (at least around here), these are the wealthiest parishes. I mean, the people are really well off, even very rich. Could it be that, for some, stressing the social aspects of the Gospel, and ignoring certain moral aspects, salves their consciences on certain issues? There is a certain self-satisfaction that can say “It’s ok for me to be so rich as long as I give some of it away and put myself forward as a proponent of a “progressive” agenda” and “It’s okay for me to contradict the moral teachings of Christ and His Church because I volunteer now and then at the soup kitchen.”
By the same token , the same thing can be applied to those who promote certain moral teachings of the Church while ignoring certain social aspects. Pope Francis addressed this recently.
If we are going to call ourselves Catholics, we better start representing the whole of the faith, and not just what suits us! Let’s follow Pope Francis’s example of being a “sign of contradiction.”