Pope: Clericalism distances the people from the Church

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
(Vatican Radio) The spirit of clericalism is an evil that is present in the Church today, Pope Francis said, and the victim of this spirit is the people, who feel discarded and abused. That was the Pope’s message in the homily at the morning Mass at the Casa Santa Marta.

Among those taking part in the Mass were the members of the Council of cardinals, who are meeting with the Pope this week in Rome.

In his homily, Pope Francis warned pastors of the dangers of becoming “intellectuals of religion” with a morality far from the Revelation of God.

The poor and humble people who have faith in the Lord are the victims of the “intellectuals of religion,” those who are “seduced by clericalism,” who will be preceded in the Kingdom of Heaven by repentant sinners.

The law of the high priests is far from Revelation

The Pope directed his attention to Jesus, who in the day’s Gospel turns to the chief priests and the elders of the people, and focuses precisely on their role. “They had juridical, moral, religious authority,” he said. “They decided everything.” Annas and Caiaphas, for example, “judged Jesus,” they were the high priests who “decided to kill Lazarus”; Judas, too, went to them to “bargain,” and thus “Jesus was sold.” They arrived at this state of “arrogance and tyranny towards the people,” the Pope said, by instrumentalizing the law:

But a law that they have remade many times: so many times, to the point that they had arrived at 500 commandments. Everything was regulated, everything! A law scientifically constructed, because this people was wise, they understood well. They made all these nuances, no? But it was a law without memory: they had forgotten the First Commandment, which God had given to our father Abraham: “Walk in my presence and be blameless.” They did not walk: they always stopped in their own convictions. They were not blameless!

The people discarded by the intellectuals of religion

And so, the Pope said, they had forgotten the Ten Commandments of Moses”: “With the law they themselves had made – intellectualistic, sophisticated, casuistic – they cancelled the law the Lord had made, they lacked the memory that connects the current moment with Revelation.” In the past their victim was Jesus; in a similar way, now their victim is “the humble and poor people who trust in the Lord,” “those who are discarded,” those who understand repentance even if they do not fulfill the law, and suffer these injustices. They feel “condemned,” and “abused,” the Pope said, by those who are vain, proud, arrogant.” And one who was cast aside by these people, Pope Francis observed, was Judas:

Judas was a traitor, he sinned gravely, eh! He sinned forcefully. But then the Gospel says, “He repented, and went to them to return the money.” And what did they do? “But you were our associate. Be calm… We have the power to forgive you for everything!” No! “Make whatever arrangement you can!” [they said.] “It’s your problem!” And they left him alone: discarded! The poor Judas, a traitor and repentant, was not welcomed by the pastors. Because these people had forgotten what it was to be a pastor. They were the intellectuals of religion, those who had the power, who advanced the catechesis of the people with a morality composed by their own intelligence and not by the revelation.

The evil of clericalism can still be found in the Church today

“A humble people, discarded and beaten by these people.” Even today, the Pope observed, this sometimes happens in the Church. “There is that spirit of clericalism,” he explained: “Clerics feel they are superior, they are far from the people”; they have no time to hear the poor, the suffering, prisoners, the sick”:

The evil of clericalism is a very ugly thing! It is a new edition of these people. And the victim is the same: the poor and humble people that awaits the Lord. The Father has always sought to be close to us: He sent His Son. We are waiting, waiting in joyful expectation, exulting. But the Son didn’t join the game of these people: The Son went with the sick, the poor, the discarded, the publicans, the sinners – and that is scandalous – the prostitutes. Today, too, Jesus says to all of us, and even to those who are seduced by clericalism: “The sinners and the prostitutes will go before you into the Kingdom of Heaven.”

news.va/en/news/pope-clericalism-distances-the-people-from-the-chu
 
The Holy Father preaches on this theme a LOT… but I have encountered very little of this problem in real life. 99% of the priests I’ve encountered are loving, compassionate, patient, kind…
 
So, the pope has preached a lot about this. The worst part is that he equates being an intellectual with arrogance and a lack of charity for the poor and abused. That strikes myself, a seminarian studying to be a priest who LOVES academics, and those priest who are studying as a very false view. We actually care more for the people because of our studies. The priests that I know and love are highly intellectual not for their own sake but for others and are the most charitable people in this world. Academics can help remove barriers that block a person from conversion.

Bishop Hedley, who wrote Lex Levitarum as a more modern version of Pope Gregory the Great’s Pastoral Care had this to say about priests who lack in studies
(The priest will be) a poor creature to the end of his career, incapable of sustained thought, never ready with an idea or a fact, looking upon scientific theology as a pedantic accomplishment instead of seeing that it is an education, professing to admire the Penny Catechism, which he is quite unable to comment upon, lauding common sense, which with him really means narrowness and laziness, utterly unskilled in that development of an idea, or that telling arrangement of matter, without which a sermon is a tissue of crudeness and of incoherence, spending his leisure, and more than he has a right to call leisure, in newspapers and light reading
St. Therese of the Little Flower said she would rather have an intellectual priest than a pastoral one. Why? Because the intellectual priest will at least know the morals and teachings of the church so as to avoid heresy. A pastoral priest may have kindness and gentleness and be great with people, but he can do this while preaching heresy. Of course, the solution to this is neither of the two because priests should be intellectual, pastoral, spiritual, and human. Not one or the other.

So, stop back sliding intellectuals. We do understand that intellectualism can lead to bad habits and a separation from the people, but it’s not as easy as one may think. And the pastoral priest can be too pastoral so as to forget his liturgical duties.
 
When the Holy Father preaches like that and continues to say that confessionals should not be torture chambers, I always feel so sorry for him, and I am really sad about what kind of priests and confessors he must have encountered in his life to think this needs to be emphasized. I have been so fortunate to have never ever in my life encountered a priest who would need such a reminder.
 
I’m beginning to think priests in Argentina must have been one prickly bunch.
 
I’m beginning to think priests in Argentina must have been one prickly bunch.
What you and I are beginning to think is mere speculation…
For good or bad, I haven t circulated all confessionaries in the nation… Not my sport.🙂

But there is a saying here : “The Devil knows because he is the devil but he knows more because he is old” *

In which case,I concede Our Holiness the experience of his age as well.🙂

*" Martin Fierro" by José Hernandez
 
When the Holy Father preaches like that and continues to say that confessionals should not be torture chambers, I always feel so sorry for him, and I am really sad about what kind of priests and confessors he must have encountered in his life to think this needs to be emphasized. I have been so fortunate to have never ever in my life encountered a priest who would need such a reminder.
Nor have I during the seventy-one years since my baptism. Firm but fair? Sure. Sometimes. And it was always both necessary and helpful.
 
What you and I are beginning to think is mere speculation…
For good or bad, I haven t circulated all confessionaries in the nation… Not my sport.🙂
I’ve experienced the gruff priest here and there in the confessional…but how am I to know he wasn’t just having a bad day? I’ve also experienced the “loosey-goosey” priest here and there. Most of the time it’s been a positive experience, but more importantly, it’s always grace-filled.
 
The Holy Father preaches on this theme a LOT… but I have encountered very little of this problem in real life. 99% of the priests I’ve encountered are loving, compassionate, patient, kind…
I have found 99% the opposite, so I can see why Pope Francis is speaking out. Maybe it’s because they are overworked, the parishes here have an average of 2000 families registered. One can not get a child baptized, confirmed or get married without a lot of hassle, classes, scheduling, etc there simply are not enough priests.

Maybe by Jesus’ time the priests had also grown tired of the people and resented them, thinking of themselves only. That’s what I have encountered. The 1% was a goodly, godly priest who sacrifices himself in serving the spiritual needs of lost sheep.
 
I have found 99% the opposite, so I can see why Pope Francis is speaking out. Maybe it’s because they are overworked, the parishes here have an average of 2000 families registered. One can not get a child baptized, confirmed or get married without a lot of hassle, classes, scheduling, etc there simply are not enough priests.

Maybe by Jesus’ time the priests had also grown tired of the people and resented them, thinking of themselves only. That’s what I have encountered. The 1% was a goodly, godly priest who sacrifices himself in serving the spiritual needs of lost sheep.
At Confession at our Church, occasionally a sign was out which said something like, “Out for Emergency, pray for more vocations!” Lol, I see that as a problem with too little “clericalism,” not too much.
 
I’ve experienced the gruff priest here and there in the confessional…but how am I to know he wasn’t just having a bad day? I’ve also experienced the “loosey-goosey” priest here and there. Most of the time it’s been a positive experience, but more importantly, it’s always grace-filled.
I would say that in general and wherever I have been,your place included,they were connected to what I was saying.
More or less,depending on very human circumstances as you say. We have bad days,days in which we are more tired and well,we are human.

But same as you,I have come out of it forgiven and grateful.
 
I have found 99% the opposite, so I can see why Pope Francis is speaking out. Maybe it’s because they are overworked, the parishes here have an average of 2000 families registered. One can not get a child baptized, confirmed or get married without a lot of hassle, classes, scheduling, etc there simply are not enough priests.

Maybe by Jesus’ time the priests had also grown tired of the people and resented them, thinking of themselves only. That’s what I have encountered. The 1% was a goodly, godly priest who sacrifices himself in serving the spiritual needs of lost sheep.
What you describe sounds more like a case of two few priests for too many people. A priest is only a man and can only be in one place at a time.
 
The Holy Father preaches on this theme a LOT… but I have encountered very little of this problem in real life. 99% of the priests I’ve encountered are loving, compassionate, patient, kind…
It was a huge problem in pre-Conciliar Quebec, but I can’t say I’ve seen it to be a huge problem in my local area. I haven’t enough experience outside the three dioceses I normally visit to say one way or another in the rest of the country.

Yes our priests are stretched very thin and can get weary, but that’s not “clericalism”, that’s altogether another problem.

I remember when Francis first became pope, he mentioned some priests of his archdiocese who would refuse to baptize babies of single mothers, which infuriated him. So perhaps he is not coming from left field on this.
 
Vatican City, Dec 13, 2016 / 04:50 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- In his homily at Mass Tuesday, Pope Francis spoke harshly about what he considers one of the great dangers of clericalism: that it alienates members of the Church by refusing to be close to them, and reinforces the belief that priests are above the laity.

Of course, this isn’t the first time that Pope Francis has spoken out against clericalism – in fact, it could easily be considered one of the most frequently-repeated topics of his pontificate; most recently to a group of Jesuits, but he has also strongly condemned it in the Church in Latin America.

The Pope’s homily Dec. 13 was given before members of the Council of Cardinals, an advisory body of the Pope, with whom he has been meeting this week. The Council, which last met Sept. 12-14, has been helping to facilitate Francis’ reform of the Roman Curia.

After the September meetings, Bishop Marcello Semeraro of Albano, secretary of the Council of Cardinals, published a summary of their work, linking the Council’s actions to the “needs for a pastoral conversion” that Pope Francis discussed in his apostolic exhortation Evangelii Gaudium.

Francis’ emphasis on the pastoral mission of the priest is again highlighted in his Dec. 13 homily. Criticizing the chief priests and elders found in the Gospels, he pointed out how even when the traitor Judas came back to them repentant, they turned him away, saying, “It’s your problem.”

The reason for this, the Pope said, is that they “had forgotten what it was to be a pastor” and instead “they were the intellectuals of religion, those who had the power, who advanced the catechesis of the people with a morality composed by their own intelligence and not by the revelation.”

In this quote, Pope Francis condemns those who do not heed God’s command in Proverbs 3:5 to “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, on your own intelligence do not rely.”

“Clerics feel they are superior, they are far from the people;” they have no time to hear the poor, the suffering, prisoners, the sick,” Francis said.

Placing it in the context of Advent, and people awaiting the birth of the Savior, Pope Francis said that the Father has “always sought to be close to us: he sent his Son. We are waiting, waiting in joyful expectation, exulting.”

“But the Son didn’t join the game of these people: The Son went with the sick, the poor, the discarded, the publicans, the sinners – and that is scandalous – the prostitutes. Today, too, Jesus says to all of us, and even to those who are seduced by clericalism: ‘The sinners and the prostitutes will go before you into the Kingdom of Heaven’.”

With his focus on the ministry of the priesthood as pastors, it isn’t surprising that Francis has criticized this superior attitude in his addresses to seminarians as well, telling a group from Southern Italy Dec. 10, to be involved and get their “hands dirty.”

“Do not feel different from your peers,” or that you are better than other people, he said. “If tomorrow you will be priests who live in the midst of the holy people of God, begin today to be young people who know how to be with everyone, who can learn something from every person you meet, with humility and intelligence.”

An updated version of the Vatican’s document on priestly formation, released Dec. 7, touched on the issue of clericalism as well, emphasizing that, as Cardinal Beniamino Stella said, to be a good priest “a demonstrated human, spiritual and pastoral maturation is necessary.”

Prefect of the Congregation for Clergy, Cardinal Stella was commenting on The Gift of Priestly Vocation, his department’s newest edition of the fundamentals of priestly formation, which says that seminarians “should be educated so that they do not become prey to ‘clericalism,’ nor yield to the temptation of modeling their lives on the search for popular consensus.”

“This would inevitably lead them to fall short in exercising their ministry as leaders of the community, leading them to think about the Church as a merely human institution.”

The document reiterates that priestly ordination, while making its recipient “a leader of the people,” should not “lead him to ‘lord it over’ the flock.”

At the heart of this message is an echo of what Pope Francis continues to repeat in his words to priests: there is a need for clergy who walk with the people, just as Jesus did, discarding no one.

Failing to live up to this calling results in priests afflicted with “the spirit of clericalism,” which in the words of Pope Francis, is “a very ugly thing.”

Full article…
 
The problem of clericalism, as it seems to be posited, seems not as prevalent in the US as it may be in other countries where there exists a huge educational and social gap between a largely uneducated and poor laity and priests who are able to exert more direct control over their flocks. This has likely been seen repeatedly by Pope Francis in South America.
 
The problem of clericalism, as it seems to be posited, seems not as prevalent in the US as it may be in other countries where there exists a huge educational and social gap between a largely uneducated and poor laity and priests who are able to exert more direct control over their flocks. This has likely been seen repeatedly by Pope Francis in South America.
Agreed. I believe we would do well to consider Pope Francis’ experience as a Jesuit missionary in Argentina.
 
Being a Jesuit missionary in Argentina is not the same thing as being the pope. The pope speaks for the whole Church, not for parts of it. If he needs to identify segments for criticism, he should specify. He seems to always be painting his canvas with the broadest of brushes and as a result, he frequently covers the goodness that exists with a gesso of disapproval. Seriously, reflect on your own experience. I think it safe to say that our experience is not that censorial clericalism has run amuck, but rather, that our pastors, be they priests, deacons or religious, are doing their level best to serve their flocks with love. And if they are failing at that, it is with tears in their hearts. The cold “intellectual” theologian is not the person we regularly meet in our faith communities. And that is not to say that we don’t need theologians! They too are part of the body of Christ.

As Paul says in 1st Corinthians (and I’m editing this for brevity and clarity), “The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” On the contrary, those parts … are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. …there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.”

In my opinion, the pope in his criticism seems to be saying, “we don’t need you!” I would expect a more measured response to the problem he seems to be pointing out, and I would expect that, as the pope, he is capable of speaking beyond the borders of his Argentinian experience.
 
So, the pope has preached a lot about this. The worst part is that he equates being an intellectual with arrogance and a lack of charity for the poor and abused. That strikes myself, a seminarian studying to be a priest who LOVES academics, and those priest who are studying as a very false view. We actually care more for the people because of our studies. The priests that I know and love are highly intellectual not for their own sake but for others and are the most charitable people in this world. Academics can help remove barriers that block a person from conversion.

Bishop Hedley, who wrote Lex Levitarum as a more modern version of Pope Gregory the Great’s Pastoral Care had this to say about priests who lack in studies

St. Therese of the Little Flower said she would rather have an intellectual priest than a pastoral one. Why? Because the intellectual priest will at least know the morals and teachings of the church so as to avoid heresy. A pastoral priest may have kindness and gentleness and be great with people, but he can do this while preaching heresy. Of course, the solution to this is neither of the two because priests should be intellectual, pastoral, spiritual, and human. Not one or the other.

So, stop back sliding intellectuals. We do understand that intellectualism can lead to bad habits and a separation from the people, but it’s not as easy as one may think. And the pastoral priest can be too pastoral so as to forget his liturgical duties.
Thank you for your thoughtful and astute post. The same argument was also firmly made by St. Teresa de Jesus (Avila)–a Doctor of the Church.
 
Being a Jesuit missionary in Argentina is not the same thing as being the pope. The pope speaks for the whole Church, not for parts of it. If he needs to identify segments for criticism, he should specify. He seems to always be painting his canvas with the broadest of brushes and as a result, he frequently covers the goodness that exists with a gesso of disapproval. Seriously, reflect on your own experience. I think it safe to say that our experience is not that censorial clericalism has run amuck, but rather, that our pastors, be they priests, deacons or religious, are doing their level best to serve their flocks with love. And if they are failing at that, it is with tears in their hearts. The cold “intellectual” theologian is not the person we regularly meet in our faith communities. And that is not to say that we don’t need theologians! They too are part of the body of Christ.

As Paul says in 1st Corinthians (and I’m editing this for brevity and clarity), “The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” On the contrary, those parts … are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. …there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it.”

In my opinion, the pope in his criticism seems to be saying, “we don’t need you!” I would expect a more measured response to the problem he seems to be pointing out, and I would expect that, as the pope, he is capable of speaking beyond the borders of his Argentinian experience.
I appreciate your post. I myself have lived significant portions of my life in different countries and continents. I went to Masses, received religious instructions, and interacted with people in the Church in different languages and cultures. Yes, there are indeed cultural differences among priests, nuns, religious and bishops in practical and pastoral approaches. I came to appreciate these people as being very wise and prudent in finding creative ways to bring the love and peace of Christ to the people they serve. I would also agree that the vast, vast, vast majority of priests, nuns, religious and bishops are faithful, and are good men and women who serve the Church with great love and conviction. Many of them are so smart and wise, and are blessed with gifts of intellect which are greatly needed in the Church. I just simply don’t understand criticisms painting these good men and women with a broad stroke with those in the Church have not exactly served the Church. In fact, I ache for them. Although these people would not expect it, it would be good to express gratitude, support and solidarity with them.

Pope Benedict spoke out forcefully and with great credibility about fraternal correction and careerism in the Church. I was heartened by it. But in the current environment, I just don’t feel the same. Communication to the sheep and to the world must improve. I will commit myself to prayers as recourse.
 
So, the pope has preached a lot about this. The worst part is that he equates being an intellectual with arrogance and a lack of charity for the poor and abused. That strikes myself, a seminarian studying to be a priest who LOVES academics, and those priest who are studying as a very false view. We actually care more for the people because of our studies. The priests that I know and love are highly intellectual not for their own sake but for others and are the most charitable people in this world. Academics can help remove barriers that block a person from conversion.

Bishop Hedley, who wrote Lex Levitarum as a more modern version of Pope Gregory the Great’s Pastoral Care had this to say about priests who lack in studies

St. Therese of the Little Flower said she would rather have an intellectual priest than a pastoral one. Why? Because the intellectual priest will at least know the morals and teachings of the church so as to avoid heresy. A pastoral priest may have kindness and gentleness and be great with people, but he can do this while preaching heresy. Of course, the solution to this is neither of the two because priests should be intellectual, pastoral, spiritual, and human. Not one or the other.

So, stop back sliding intellectuals. We do understand that intellectualism can lead to bad habits and a separation from the people, but it’s not as easy as one may think. And the pastoral priest can be too pastoral so as to forget his liturgical duties.
Clearly the Pope is not against intellectuals in general. Otherwise his praise for the Pope Emeritus, Cardinal Kasper, Cardinal Schonborn, many deceased theologians etc., would be in vain. He’s trying to emphasize doing “theology on one’s knees”.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top